Citations to the "Introduction to informetrics" indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar

Scientometrics

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 495-506

  Bar Ilan, Judit ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Citations; Google Scholar; Introduction to informetrics; Scopus; Web of Science

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952095862     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0185-9     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bakalbassi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J. & Wang, L. (2006). Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomedical Research Libraries 3(7).
2. Bar-Ilan, J. (2006a). H-index for Price medalists revisited. ISSI Newsletter, 2(1), 3-5.
3. Bar-Ilan, J. (2006b). An ego-centric citation analysis of the works of Michael O. Rabin based on multiple citation indexes. Information Processing and Management, 42(6), 1553-1566.
4. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index?-A comparison of WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257-271.
5. Bauer, K., Bakalbassi, N. (2005). An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication environment. D-Lib Magazine, 11(9). http://www. dlib. org/dlib/september05/bauer/09bauer. html.
6. Gavel, Y., & Iselid, L. (2008). Web of Science and Scopus: A journal title overlap study. Online Information Review, 32(1), 8-21.
7. Giles, J. (2005). Start your engines. Nature News, 438, 554-555.
8. Hartman, K. A., & Mullen, L. B. (2008). Google Scholar and academic libraries: An update. New Library World, 109(5/6), 2122-2222.
9. Harzing, A. K., & van Der Wal, R. (2008). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 6, 61-73.
10. Jacso, P. (2006). Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts. Online Information Review, 30(3), 297-309.
11. Jacso, P. (2008). Google Scholar revisited. Online Information Review, 32(1), 102-114.
12. Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2007). Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 1055-1065.
13. Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines. Scientometrics, 74(2), 273-294.
14. López-Illescas, C., Moya-Anegón, F., & Moed, H. F. (2008). Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 304-316.
15. Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105-2125.
16. Meho, L. & Rogers, Y. (2008). Citation counting, citation ranking and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers: A comparison between Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1711-1726.
17. Moed, H. F. & Visser, M. (2007). Developing bibliometric indicators of research performance in computer science: An exploratory study. CWTS Report 2007-01.
18. Moed, H. F. & Visser, M. (2008). Comparing Web of science and Scopus on a paper-by-paper basis. In Book of Abstracts of the 10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators.
19. Mullen, L. B., & Hartman, K. A. (2006). Google Scholar and the Library Web Site: The early response by ARL Libraries. College & Research Libraries, 67(2), 106-122.
20. Neuhaus, C., Neuhaus, E., Asher, A., & Wrede, C. (2006). The depth and breadth of Google Scholar: An empirical study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(2), 127-141.
21. Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2007). Comparing alternatives to Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences' literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 161-169.
22. Noruzi, A. (2005). Google Scholar: A new generation of citation indexes. Libri, 55(4), 170-180.
23. Rahm, E., & Thor, A. (2005). Citation analysis of database publications. ACM SIGMOD Record, 34(4), 48-53.