Designing programmatic interventions

Handbook of Reading Research

Volumn 3, Issue , 2016, Pages 99-108

  Pigott, Therese D ^a   Barr, Rebecca ^b  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NATIONAL LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071587372     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Alvermann, D. E., O'Brien, D. G., & Dillon, D. R (1990). What teachers do when they say they're having discussions of content area reading assignments: A qualitative analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 296-322
2. August, D., & Hakuta, K. (1997). Program evaluation. In D. August & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Educating language minority children (pp. 55-71). National Research Council Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
3. Beck, L. L., McKeown, M. G., Sandora, c., Kucan, L., & Worthy, J. (1996). Questioning the author: A yearlong classroom implementation to engage students with text. Elementary School Journal, 96, 385-414
4. Bereiter, c., & Bird, M. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 131-156
5. Bond, G. L., & Dykstra, R (1967). The Cooperative Research Program in first-grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 5-142
6. Brock, C. (1997). Exploring the use of Book Club with second-language learners in mainstream classrooms. In S. i. McMahon, & T. E. Raphael (Eds.), The Book Club connection: Literacy learning and classroom talk (pp. 141-158). New York: Teachers College Press
7. Brown, A i. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178
8. Campbell, D. T. (1963). From description to experimentation: Interpreting trends as quasi-experiments. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change (pp. 212-242). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press
9. Campbell, D. T. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24, 409-429
10. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally
11. Chall, J. S. (1995). Learning to read: The areas debate. New York: McGraw-Hill. (Original work published 1968 and 1983)
12. Collins, A (1991). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). New York: Springer-Verlag
13. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Ouasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally
14. Cook, T. D., & Reichardt, c. S. (Eds.). (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
15. Cronbach, L. J. (1963). Course improvement through evaluation. Teachers College Record, 64, 672-684
16. Dahl, K. L., & Freppon, P. A (1995). A comparison of inner-city children's interpretations of reading and writing instruction in the early grades in skills-based and whole language classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 50-74
17. Dykstra, R (1968). Summary of the second grade phase of the Cooperative Research Program in primary reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 4, 49-70
18. Eeds, M., & Wells, D. (1989). Grand conversations: An explanation of meaning construction in literature study groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 4-29
19. Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eve: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan
20. Gaskins, I. w., Anderson, R c., Pressley, M., Cunicelli, E. A, & Sallow, E. (1993). Six teachers' dialogue during cognitive process instruction. Elementary School Journal, 93, 277-304
21. Goldenberg, C. (1992). Instructional conversations: Promoting comprehension through discussion. Reading Teacher, 46, 316-326
22. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
23. Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., McCann, A D., Wigfield, A, Bennett, L., Poundstone, C .c., Rice, M. E., Faibisch, F. M., Hunt, B., & Mitchell, A M. (1996). Growth of literacy engagement: Changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 306-332
24. Guzzetti, B. J., & Williams, W. O. (1996). Gender, text, and discussion: Examining intellectual safety in the science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 5-20
25. Hargreaves, A (1996). Transforming knowledge: Blurring the boundaries between research, policy, and practice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 105-122
26. Hickman, J. (1983). Everything considered: Response to literature in an elementary school setting. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 16, 8-13
27. Hiebert, E. H. (1994). Reading Recovery in the United States: What difference does it make to an age cohort? Educational Researcher, 23(9), 15-25
28. Hyman, H. H., Wright, C. R, & Hopkins, T. K. (1962). Applications of methods of evaluation: Four studies of the encampment for citizenship. Berkeley: University of California Press
29. Lysynchuk, I. M., Pressley, M., d' Ailly, H., Smith, M., & Cake, H. (1989). Amethodological analysis of experimental studies of comprehension strategy instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 458-470
30. Marshall, J. D. (1987). The effects of writing on students' understanding of literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 30-63
31. McMahon, S. I. (1997). Reading in the Book Club program. In S. I. McMahon & T. E. Raphael (Eds.), The Book Club connection (pp. 47-68). New York: Teachers College Press
32. Morrow, I. M., Pressley, M., Smith, J. K, & Smith, M. (1997). The effect of a literature-based program integrated into literacy and science instruction with children from diverse backgrounds. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 55-76
33. Neuman, S. B., & McCormick, S. (Eds.). (1995). Single-subject experimental research: Applications for literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association
34. Newman, D. (1990). Opportunities for research on the organizational impact of school computers. Educational Researcher, 19, 8-13
35. Newman, D. (1991). Formative experiments on the convolution of technology and the educational environment. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). New York: Springer-Verlag
36. Paris, S. G., & Oka, E. R (1986). Children's reading strategies, metacognition, and motivation. Developmental Review, 6, 25-56
37. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage
38. Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
39. Pearson, P. D. (1997). The First-Grade Studies: A personal reflection. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 428-432
40. Peterson, P. i. (1998). Why do educational research? Rethinking our roles and identified, our texts and contexts. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 4-10
41. Pitman, M. A., & Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Qualitative approaches to evaluation: Models and methods. In M. D. LeCompte, W. i. Millroy, &J. Preiss Ie (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 729-770). New York: Academic Press
42. Pressley, M., EI-Dinary, P. B., Gaskins, L., Schuder, T, Bergman, J., Almasi, L., & Brown, R. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. Elementary School Journal, 92, 511-554
43. Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R (1994). Increasing the quality of educational intervention research. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 191-208
44. Reinking, D., & Pickle, J. M. (1993). Using a formative experiment to study how computers affect reading and writing in classrooms. In D. J. Leu & c. K. Kinzer (Eds.), Examining central issues in literacy research, theory, and practice (pp. 263-270). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference
45. Reinking, D., & Watkins, J. (1997). Balancing change and understanding in literacy research through formative experiments. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, Scottsdale, AZ
46. Ridgeway, V. G., Dunston, P. J., & Qian, G. (1993). A methodological analysis of teaching and learning strategy research at the secondary school level. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 335-349
47. Robinson, V. M. J. (1998). Methodology and the research-practice gap. Educational Researcher, 27, 17-26
48. Rose, T L., & Beattie, J. R (1986). Relative effects of teacher-directed and taped previewing on oral reading. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 9, 193-199
49. Saunders, W., O'Brien, G., Lennon, D., & McLean, J. (1998). Making the transition to English literacy successful: Effective strategies for studying literature with transition students. InR Gersten & R Jimenez (Eds.), Effective strategies for teaching language minority students (pp.99-132). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
50. Siegel, M., & Fonzi, J. M. (1995). The practice of reading in an inquiry-oriented mathematics class. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 632-673
51. Shanahan, T, & Barr, R (1995). Reading Recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early instructional intervention for at risk learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 958-996
52. Smith, E. R, & Tyler, R W. (1942). Appraising and recording student progress. New York: Harper & Row
53. Smolkin, I. B., Yaden, D. B., Brown, L., & Hofius, B. (1992). The effects of genre, visual design choices, and discourse structure on preschoolers' responses to picture books during parent-child read-alouds. In C. K Kinzer & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Literacy research, theory and practice: Views from many perspectives (pp. 291-301). Chicago: National Reading Conference
54. Stake, R E. (Ed.). (1975). Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach. Columbus, OH: Merrill
55. Stallings, J. (1975). Implementation and child effects of teaching practices in Follow Through classrooms. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40
56. Stebbins, I. B., St. Pierre, R G., Proper, E. G., Anderson, R B., & Cerva, T R (1977). Education as experimentation: A planned variation model. Vol. IV-A. An evaluation of Follow Through. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates
57. Weiss, C. H. (1972). Evaluation research: Methods for assessing program effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
58. Willis, A. L., & Harris, V. J. (1997). Expanding the boundaries: A reaction to the First-Grade Studies. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 439-445
59. Wolf, R M. (1990). Evaluation in education: Foundations of competency assessment and program review (3rd ed.). New York: Praeger
60. Yaden, D. B. (1995). Reversal designs. In S. B. Neuman & S. McCormick (Eds.), Single subject experimental research: Applications for literacy (pp. 32-46). Newark, DE: International Reading Association