Effects of Technology-Enhanced Practice on Scoring Accuracy of Oral Reading Fluency

Journal of Special Education Technology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 5-12

  Riccomini, Paul J ^a   Stecker, Pamela M ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071303234     PISSN: 01626434     EISSN: 23813121     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016264340502000301     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Chickering A.W., Ehrmann S.C., (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin. Retrieved December 15, 2003, from http://www.aahebulletin.com/public/archive.
2. Chickering A.W., Gamson Z.F., (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin. Retrieved December 15, 2003, from http://www.aahebulletin.com/public/archive.
3. Chickering A.W., Gamson Z.F., (1999). Development and adaptations of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Teaching and Directions in Learning, 80, 75–81.
4. Deno S. L., (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
5. Deno S. L., (1992). The nature and development of curriculum-based measurement. Preventing School Failure, 36(2), 5–10.
6. Deno S. L., (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 184–192.
7. Fuchs L. S., Deno S. L., (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488–500.
8. Hartley K. W., (1999). Media overload in instructional Web pages and the impact on learning. Educational Media International, 36(2), 145–150.
9. Hughes C., Hewson L., (1998). Online interactions: Developing a neglected aspect of the virtual classroom. Educational Technology, 38 (4), 48–55.
10. Ludlow B.L., (2001). Technology and teacher education in special education: Disaster or deliverance? Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(2), 143–163.
11. Meister J.C., (2000, April 3). Savvy e-learners drive revolution in education: The case for corporate universities. Financial Times, p. 1.
12. Meyen E.L., Aust R., Gauch J.M., Hinton H.S., Isaacson R.E., Smith S.J., (2002). E-learning: A programmatic research construct for the future. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(3), 37–46.
13. Meyen E. T., Tangen P., Lian C., (1999). Developing online instruction: Partnership between instructors and technical developers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14(1), 18–31.
14. National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00–4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15. Riccomini P., (2002). The comparative effectiveness of two forms of feedback: Web-based model comparison and instructor delivered feedback. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27(3), 213–228.
16. Scott, Foresman reading: An American tradition. (1989). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
17. Shinn M. R., (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
18. Shinn M. R., (Ed.). (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford.
19. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). The condition of education 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20. Yong Y., (1998). Learners' perceptions on learning through the web. Journal of Instructional Delivery Systems, 12(1), 23–26.