The emergence of anti-privacy and control at the nexus between the concepts of safe city and smart city

Smart Cities

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2019, Pages 96-105

  Allam, Zaheer ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Anti privacy; Liveability; Propaganda; Safe city; Smart city; Transparency

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070965267     PISSN: None     EISSN: 26246511     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/smartcities2010007     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Sarkar, S. Urban scaling and the geographic concentratin of inequalities by city size. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 2018. [CrossRef]
2. Moser, C.O.N.; Mcilwaine, C. New frontiers in twenty-first century urban conflict and violence. Environ. Urban. 2014, 26, 331–344. [CrossRef]
3. Peerzado, M.B.; Magsi, H.; Sheikh, M.J. Land use conflict and urban sprawl: Conversion of agriculture lands into urbanization in hyderabad, pakistan. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2018, in press. [CrossRef]
4. Ianoş, I.; Sorensen, A.; Merciua, C. Incoherence of urban planning policy in bucharest: Its potential for land use conflict. Land Use Policy 2017, 60, 101–112. [CrossRef]
5. Lacinák, M.; Ristvej, J. Smart city, safety and security. Procedia Eng. 2017, 192, 522–527. [CrossRef]
6. Tripathi, V. Achieving urban sustainability through safe city. J. Hum. Ecol. 2017, 59, 1–9. [CrossRef]
7. Bruneo, D.; Distefano, S.; Giacobbe, M.; Minnolo, A.L.; Longoa, F.; Merlino, G.; Mulfari, D.; Panarello, A.; Patanè, G.; Puliafito, A.; et al. An iot service ecosystem for smart cities: The #smartme project. Internet Things 2019, 5, 12–33.
8. Bibri, S.E. The iot for smart sustainable cities of the future: An analytical framework for sensor-based big data applicaitons for environmental sustainability. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 38, 230–253. [CrossRef]
9. Bini, S.A. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, and cognitive computing: What do these terms mean and how will they impact health care? J. Arthroplast. 2018, 33, 2358–2361. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Bassoo, V.; Ramnarain, S.; Hurbungs, V.; Fowdur, T.P.; Beeharry, Y. Big data analytics for smart cities. In Internet of Things and Big Data Analytics toward Next-Generation Intelligence. Studies in Big Data; Dey, N., Hassanien, A., Bhatt, C., Stapathy, S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 30.
11. Barkham, R.; Bokhari, S.; Saiz, A. Urban Big Data: City Management and Real Estate Markets; MIT Center for Real Estate and DUSP: New York, NY, USA, 2018.
12. Hammi, M.T.; Hammi, B.; Bellot, P.; Serhrouchni, A. Bubbles of trust: A decentralized blockchain based authentication system for iot. Comput. Secur. 2018, 78, 126–142. [CrossRef]
13. Allam, Z.; Dhunny, Z.A. On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities 2019, 89, 80–91. [CrossRef]
14. Braun, T.; Banjamin, C.M.F.; Iqbal, F.; Shah, B. Security and privacy challenges in smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 39, 499–507. [CrossRef]
15. IFSEC Global. Why a Smart City must also Be Safe City. Available online: https://www.ifsecglobal.com/safe-cities/smart-city-must-also-safe-city/(accessed on 20 February 2019).
16. Yigitcanlar, T.; Kamruzzaman, M.; Buys, L.; Ioppolo, G.; Sabatini-Marques, J.; da Costa, E.M.; Yun, J.J. Understanding “smart cities”: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework. Cities 2018, 81, 145–160. [CrossRef]
17. Allam, M.Z. Redefining the Smart City: Culture, Metabolism and Governance. Case Study of Port Louis, Mauritius. Ph. D. Thesis, Curtin University, Perth, Australia, 2018.
18. Allam, Z. Contextualising the smart city for sustainability and inclusivity. New Des. Ideas 2018, 2, 124–127.
19. Allam, Z. On smart contracts and organisational performance: A review of smart contracts through the blockchain technology. Rev. Econ. Bus. Stud. 2018, 11, 137–156. [CrossRef]
20. Allam, Z.; Newman, P. Redefining the smart city: Culture, metabolism & governance. Smart Cities 2018, 1, 4–25.
21. Yang, F.; Xu, J. Privacy concerns in china’s smart city campaign: The deficit of china’s cybersecurity law. Asia Pac. Stud. 2018, 5, 533–543. [CrossRef]
22. Finch, K.; Tene, O. Smart cities: Privacy, transparency, and community. In Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy; Selinger, E., Polonestsky, J., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2018.
23. Cui, L.; Xie, G.; Qu, Y.; Gao, L.; Yang, Y. Security and privacy in smart cities: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 46134–46145. [CrossRef]
24. Alomair, B.; Poovendran, R. Efficient authentication for mobile and pervasive computing. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2014, 13, 469–481. [CrossRef]
25. Mosenia, A.; Jha, N.K. A comprehensive study of security of internet of things. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 2017, 5, 586–602. [CrossRef]
26. PWC. Safe Cities: The India Story; The Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM)/PWC: New Delhi, India, 2013.
27. West, D.M.; Bernstein, D. Benefits and Best Practices of Safe City Innovation; Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings: Washington, DC, USA, 2017.
28. Ruoso, L.-E.; Plant, R. A politics of place framework for unravelling peri-urban conflict: An example of peri-urban sydney, australia. J. Urban Manag. 2018, 7, 57–69. [CrossRef]
29. Allam, Z. Building a conceptual framework for smarting an existing city in mauritius: The case of port louis. J. Biourbanism 2017, 4, 103–121.
30. Singapore Police Force. Mid-year crime statistics for January to June 2018. In Police News Release; Singapore Police Force: Singapore, 2018; pp. 1–8.
31. Ma, S.; Chen, X.; Li, Z.; Yang, Y. A retrival optimized surveillance video storage system for campus application scenarios. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2018, 2018, 3839104.
32. Trinks, A.; Scholtens, B.; Mulder, M.; Dam, L. Fossil fuel divestment and portfolio performance. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 146, 740–748. [CrossRef]
33. Bai, J. Bulding an open platform for safe cities. In Safe City: The Road to Collaborative Public Safety; Huawei Enterprise, Ed.; Huawei Online: Shenzhen, China, 2018.
34. Guades, A.L.A.; Alvarenga, J.C.; Goulart, M.D.S.S.; Rodriguez, M.V.R.; Soares, C.A.P. Smart cities: The main drivers for increasing the intelligence of cities. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3121. [CrossRef]
35. Huawei. Huawei Safe City Solution: Safeguards Serbia. Available online: https://e.huawei.com/en/case-studies/global/2018/201808231012 (accessed on 8 February 2019).
36. Elmaghraby, A.S.; Losavio, M.M. Cyber security challenges in smart cities: Safety, security and privacy. J. Adv. Res. 2014, 5, 491–497. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37. White, M.; Margolies, J.; Ronanki, R.; Steier, D.; Tuff, G.; Bhattacharya, A.; Gupta, N.; Saif, I. Exponential technology watch list: Innovation opportunities on the horizon. In Tech Trends: The Symphonic Enterprise; Deloitte Insight, Ed.; Deloitte Insight: Washington, DC, USA, 2018.
38. Abouelmehdi, K.; Beni-Hessane, A.; Khaloufi, H.J. Big healthcare data: Preserving security and privacy. J. Big Data 2018, 5. [CrossRef]
39. McKinsey & Company. Smart Cities: Digital Solutions for a More Liveable Future; McKinsey & Company: Brussel, Belgium, 2018; pp. 1–152.
40. Pinto, N. Google Is Transforming Nyc’s Payphones into a ‘Personalized Propaganda Engine’. Available online: https://www.villagevoice.com/2016/07/06/google-is-transforming-nycs-payphones-into-a-personalized-propaganda-engine/(accessed on 10 February 2019).
41. Lam, P.T.I.; Ma, R. Potential pitfalls in the development of smart cities and mitigation measures: An exploratory study. Cities 2018, in press. [CrossRef]
42. Martínez-Ballesté, A.; Pérez-Martínez, P.A.; Solanas, A. The pursuit of citizens’ privacy: A privacy—aware smart city is possible. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2013, 51, 136–141. [CrossRef]
43. Lim, C.; Kim, K.-J.; Maglio, P.P. Smart cities with big data: Reference models, challenges and considerations. Cities 2018, 82, 86–99. [CrossRef]
44. Kummitha, R.K.R.; Crutzen, N. How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective. Cities 2017, 67, 43–52. [CrossRef]
45. Van Zoonen, L. Privacy concerns in smart cities. Gov. Inf. Q. 2016, 33, 472–480. [CrossRef]
46. Grossi, G.; Pianezzi, D. Smart cities: Utopia or neoliberal ideology? Cities 2017, 69, 79–85. [CrossRef]
47. Bhadani, A.J. Big data: Challenges, opportunities and realities. In Effective Big Data Management and Opportunities for Implemention; Singh, M.K., Kumar, D.G., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2016; pp. 1–24.
48. Sun, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xiong, Y.; Zhu, G. Data security and privacy in cloud computing. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2014, 10. [CrossRef]
49. Anisetti, M.; Ardagna, C.; Bellandi, V.; Cremoni, M.; Frati, F.; Damaini, E. Privacy-aware big data analytics as a service for public health policies in smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 39, 68–77. [CrossRef]
50. Guerrini, F. Cities Cannot Be Reduced to just Big Data and Iot: Smart City Lessons from Yinchuan, China; Forbes: Yinchuan, China, 2016.
51. Calzada, I.; Cowie, P. Beyond smart and data-driven city-regions? Rethinking stakeholder-helixes strategies. Reg. Mag. 2017, 308, 25–28. [CrossRef]
52. Edwards, L. Privacy, Security and Data Protection in Smart Cities: A Critical eu Law Perspective; CREATe: London, UK, 2015.
53. Tzafestas, S.G. Synergy of iot and ai in modern society: The robotics and automation case. Robot. Autom. Eng. J. 2018, 31, 1–15.
54. Čolaković, A.; Hadžialić, M. Internet of things (iot): A review of enabling technologies, challenges, and open research issues. Comput. Netw. 2018, 144, 17–39. [CrossRef]
55. Kim, T.-H.; Ramos, C.; Mohammed, S. Smart city and iot. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2017, 76, 159–162. [CrossRef]
56. Botta, A.; Donato, W.D.; Persico, V.; Pescapé, A. Integration of cloud computing and internet of things: A survey. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2016, 56, 684–700. [CrossRef]
57. Denton, S.W.; Pauwels, E. There’s Nowhere to Hide; Synenergene: Elangana, India, 2018; pp. 1–28.
58. Allam, Z.; Newman, P. Economically incentivising smart urban regeneration. Case study of port louis, mauritius. Smart Cities 2018, 1, 53–74. [CrossRef]
59. Cruz, C.O.; Sarmento, J.M. Reforming traditional ppp models to cope with the challenges of smart cities. Compet. Regul. Netw. Ind. 2017, 18, 94–114. [CrossRef]
60. Edwards, L. Privacy, security and data protection in smart cities: A critical eu law perspective. Eur. Data Prot. Law Rev. (Lexxion) 2016, 2, 28. [CrossRef]
61. Boyer, E.J.; Van Slyke, D.M. Citizen attitudes towards public-private partnerships. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 2018, 1–16. [CrossRef]
62. Sanseverino, E.R.; Sanseverion, R.R.; Anello, E. A cross-reading approach to smart city: A european perspective of chinese smart cities. Smart Cities 2018, 1, 26–52. [CrossRef]
63. Hamilton, S.; Zhu, X. Funding and Financing Smart Cities; Deloitte: London, UK, 2018.
64. Fishman, T.D.; Flynn, M. Part two: Funding and financing smart cities series. In Using Public-Private Partnerships to Advance Smart Cities; Deloitte Center for Government Insights: London, UK, 2018; pp. 1–10.
65. Milenković, M.; Rašić, M.; Vojković, G. Using public private partnership models in smart cities—proposal for Croatia. In Proceedings of the 40th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia, 22–26 May 2017; IEEE: Opatija, Croatia, 2017.
66. Doyle, P. Making Smart Cities into Safe Cities. Available online: https://gcn.com/articles/2016/10/11/safe-smart-cities.aspx (accessed on 4 March 2019).
67. London, E. The World’s Safest Cities Ranking. 2018. Available online: https://ceoworld.biz/2018/09/19/the-worlds-safest-cities-ranking-2018/(accessed on 5 March 2019).
68. Gallup. 2018 global law and order. In Gallup World Polls; Gallup: Washington, DC, USA, 2018; pp. 1–11.
69. Berrone, P.; Ricart, J.E. IESE Cities in Motion Index; IESE Business School, University of Navara: Pamplona, Spain, 2018.
70. Eckhoff, D.; Wagner, I. Privacy in the Smart City—Applications, Technologies, Challenges and Solutions. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2018, 20, 489–516. [CrossRef]
71. Eco-Business. Japan ‘Smart’ Cities Relyon Public-Private Partnerships. Available online: https://www.eco-business.com/news/japan-smart-cities-rely-on-public-private-partnerships/(accessed on 10 January 2019).
72. Ter, K.L. Singapore’s cybersecurity strategy. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 2018, 34, 924–927. [CrossRef]
73. Loideain, N.N. Cape town as a smart and safe city: Implications for governance and data privacy. Int. Data Priv. Law 2017, 7, 314–334. [CrossRef]
74. Co-Creating the Cities of Tomorrow—Danish Smart City Competencies in Singaporean Market; Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, United Square: Singapore, 2015.
75. van den Hurk, M. Public-private partnerships: Where do we go from here? A belgian perspective. Public Works Manag. Policy 2018, 23, 274–294. [CrossRef]
76. Calzada, I. (smart) citizens from data providers to decision-makers? The case study of barcelona. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3252. [CrossRef]
77. Baig, Z.A.; Szewczyk, P.; Valli, C.; Rabadia, P.; Hannay, P.; Chernyshev, M.; Johnstone, M.; Kerai, P.; Ibrahim, A.; Sansurooah, K.; et al. Future challenges for smart cities: Cyber-security and digital forensic. Digit. Investig. 2017, 22, 3–13. [CrossRef]
78. Altman, M.; Wood, A.; O’Brien, D.R.; Gasser, U. Practical approaches to big data privacy over time. Int. Data Priv. Law 2018, 8, 29–51. [CrossRef]
79. Gupta, A.; Anpalagan, A.; Carvalho, G.H.S.; Guan, L.; Woungang, I. Prevailing and emerging cyber threats and security practices in iot-enabled smart grids: A survey. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2019, in press. [CrossRef]
80. Svenonius, O. The body politics of the urban age: Reflections on surveillance and effect. Palgrave Commun. 2018, 4, 2. [CrossRef]
81. Allam, Z.; Jones, D. Promoting resilience, liveability and sustainability through landscape architectural design: A conceptual framework for port louis, mauritius; a small island developing state. In IFLA World Congress Singapore 2018; International Federation of Landscape Architects: Singapore, 2018; pp. 1599–1611.
82. Jackson, S.; Yaqub, M.; Li, C. The agile deployment of machine learning models in healthcare. Frontier 2018, 1, 7. [CrossRef]
83. Maple, C. Security and privacy in the internet of things. J. Cyber Policy 2017, 2, 155–184. [CrossRef]