Argumentation as core curriculum

Learning: Research and Practice

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 66-78

  Kuhn, Deanna ^a   Moore, Wendy ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

argumentation; curriculum; dialogue; evidence

Indexed keywords

EID: 85068918249     PISSN: 23735082     EISSN: 23735090     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23735082.2015.994254     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Asterhan, C., & Schwarz, B., (2007). The effects of dialogical and monological argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 626–639.
2. Billig, M., (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Chinn, C., & Clark, D., (2013). Learning through collaborative argumentation. In C., Hmelo-Silver, C., Chinn, C., Chan, & A., O’Donnell (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
4. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
5. Crowell, A., & Kuhn, D., (2014). Developing dialogic argumentation skills: A three-year intervention study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15, 363–381.
6. Felton, M., & Kuhn, D., (2001). The development of argumentive discourse skills. Discourse Processes, 32, 135–153.
7. Ford, M., (2012). A dialogic account of sense-making in scientific argumentation and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 30, 207–245.
8. Graff, G., (2003). Clueless in academe: How schooling obscures the life of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., & Erduran, S., (2008). Designing argumentation learning environments. In S., Erduran & M., Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. New York, NY: Springer.
10. Kuhn, D., (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A., (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking. Psychological Science, 22, 545–552.
12. Kuhn, D., Goh, W., Iordanou, K., & Shaenfield, D., (2008). Arguing on the computer: A microgenetic study of developing argument skills in a computer-supported environment. Child Development, 79, 1311–1329.
13. Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, V., (2014). Argue with me: Developing thinking and writing through dialog. Bronxville, NY: Wessex Press.
14. Kuhn, D., & Udell, W., (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74, 1245–1260.
15. Kuhn, D., Wang, Y., & Li, H., (2011). Why argue: Developing understanding of the purposes and value of argumentive discourse. Discourse Processes, 48, 26–49.
16. Nussbaum, E. M., & Edwards, O., (2011). Critical questions and argument stratagems: A framework for enhancing and analyzing students’ reasoning practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20, 443–488.
17. Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S., (2013). What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education. Review of Educational Research, 83, 483–520.
18. Resnick, L. B., Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C., (2010). How (well structured) talk builds the mind. In R., Sternberg & D., Preiss (Eds.), From genes to context: New discoveries about learning from educational research and their applications. New York, NY: Springer.
19. Shank, R., (2011). Teaching minds: How cognitive science can save our schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
20. Walton, D. N., (1989). Dialogue theory for critical thinking. Argumentation, 3, 169–184.