An analysis of EU counterterrorism discourse post-September 11

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 233-247

  Jackson, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85068275041     PISSN: 09557571     EISSN: 1474449X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09557570701414617     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Banerjee, Sanjoy. 1998. Narratives and interaction: a constitutive theory of interaction and the case of the All-Indian Muslim League. European Journal of International Relations, 4 (2): 178–203.
2. Barkawi, Tarak. 2004. On the pedagogy of “small wars”. International Affairs, 80 (1): 19–37.
3. Bloom, Mia. 2005. Dying to kill, New York: Columbia University Press.
4. Burke, Jason. 2003. Al-Qaeda: the true story of radical Islam, London: Penguin.
5. Campbell, David. 1998. Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
6. Collins, John, and Glover, Ross, eds. 2002. Collateral language: a user's guide to America's new war, New York: New York University Press.
7. Copeland, Thomas. 2001. Is the new terrorism really new? An analysis of the new paradigm for terrorism. Journal of Conflict Studies, 21 (2): 91–105.
8. Council of the European Union (2003) A secure Europe in a better world: European security strategy, Brussels, 12 December
9. Council of the European Union (2005a) ‘The European Union Counter-Terrorism Strategy’, 30 November, EU Council document 14469/4/05 REV 4
10. Council of the European Union (2005b) ‘The European Union Strategy for combating radicalisation and recruitment to terrorism’, 24 November, EU Presidency document 4781/1/05 REV 1
11. Cowen, Brian, Minister for Foreign Affairs (2004) ‘Statement to the UN Commission on Human Rights’, Geneva, 15 March
12. Croft, Stuart. 2006. Culture, crisis and America's war on terror, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
13. de Vries, Gijs, EU Counter-Terrorism Coordinator (2004a) ‘Address at the Seminar on EU Cooperation in preparing for attacks with CBRN agents’, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The Hague, 7 July, < http://www.terrorisminfo.mipt.org/Radiological-Terrorism.asp >, accessed 22 May 2006
14. de Vries, Gijs, EU Counter-Terrorism Coordinator (2004b) [untitled], Financial Times, 30 November, < https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/Article_Financial_Times_30.November.2004.pdf >, accessed 22 May 2006
15. de Vries, Gijs, EU Counter-Terrorism Coordinator (2005) ‘Interview’, NATO Review, 3 (Autumn), < http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2005/issue3/english/interview_pr.html >, accessed 22 May 2006
16. Doty, Roxanne. 1993. Foreign policy as social construction: a post-positivist analysis of US counterinsurgency policy in the Philippines. International Studies Quarterly, 37 (3): 297–320.
17. Duffield, Mark. 2001. Global governance and the new wars: the merging of development and security, London: Zed Books.
18. Duyvesteyn, Isabelle. 2004. How new is the new terrorism?. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 27 (5): 439–454.
19. European Commission (2002) ‘Joint statement on the fight against terrorism’, Tenth EU-Russia Summit, Brussels, 11 November, < http://ec.europa.eu/comm/external_relations/russia/summit_11_02/js_terr.htm >, accessed 22 May 2006
20. European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (2006) ‘Report: Muslims in the European Union: discrimination and Islamophobia’, 18 December, < http://eumc.europa.eu/eumc/index.php >, accessed 20 December 2006
21. European Union Presidency (2002) ‘EU Presidency statement to the Security Council on terrorism’, EU Presidency document PRES02-002EN, 18 January, < http://www.europa-eu-un.org/articles/en/article_1025_en.htm >, accessed 22 May 2006
22. General Affairs and External Relations Council (2004) ‘Declaration on combating terrorism is adopted in Brussels’, Press Release, 25 March, < http://www.eu2004.ie >, accessed 22 May 2006
23. Halliday, Fred. 2002. Two hours that shook the world—September 11, 2001: causes and consequences, London: Saqi Books.
24. Hegghammer, Thomas. 2006. Global jihadism after the Iraq War. The Middle East Journal, 60 (1): 11–22.
25. Holmes, Stephen. 2005. “ Al Qaeda, September 11, 2001 ”. In Making sense of suicide missions, Edited by: Gambetta, Diego. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Horgan, John. 2003. “ The search for the terrorist personality ”. In Terrorists, victims and society: psychological perspectives on terrorism and its consequences, Edited by: Silke, Andrew. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
27. Jackson, Richard. 2005a. Writing the war on terrorism: language, politics and counterterrorism, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
28. Jackson, Richard. 2005b. Security, democracy and the rhetoric of counter-terrorism. Democracy & Security, 1 (2): 147–171.
29. Jackson, Richard (2006) ‘Religion, politics and terrorism: a critical analysis of narratives of “Islamic terrorism”’, Centre for International Politics Working Paper, University of Manchester, < http://www.socialsciences.man.ac.uk/politics/research/research_groups/cip/documents/Jackson_000.pdf >, accessed 26 February 2007
30. Jackson, Richard. 2007a. “ Critical reflections on counter-sanctuary discourse ”. In Denial of sanctuary: understanding terrorist safe havens, Edited by: Innes, Michael. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Security International.
31. Jackson, Richard. 2007b. “ Playing the politics of fear: writing the terrorist threat in the war on terrorism ”. In Playing politics with terrorism: a user's guide, Edited by: Kassimeris, George. New York: New York University Press.
32. Jenkins, Brian. 1998. “ Will terrorists go nuclear? A reappraisal ”. In The future of terrorism: violence in the new millennium, Edited by: Kushner, Harvey. London: Sage.
33. Jorgensen, Marianne, and Phillips, Louise. 2002. Discourse analysis as theory and method, London: Sage.
34. Laffey, Mark, and Weldes, Jutta. 1997. Beyond belief: ideas and symbolic technologies in the study of international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 3 (2): 193–237.
35. Milliken, Jennifer. 1999. The study of discourse in international relations: a critique of research and methods. European Journal of International Relations, 5 (2): 225–254.
36. Monar, Jörg. 2007. Common threat and common response? The European Union's counter-terrorism strategy and its problems. Government & Opposition, 42 (3): 292–313.
37. Mueller, John. 2006. Overblown: how politicians and the terrorism industry inflate national security threats, and why we believe them, New York: Free Press.
38. Murphy, John. 2003. “Our mission and our moment”: George W Bush and September 11. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 6 (4): 607–632.
39. Pape, Robert. 2005. Dying to win: the strategic logic of suicide terrorism, New York: Random House.
40. nded, London: Pluto Press.
41. Rogers, Paul (various months) ‘International Security Monthly Briefing’, The Oxford Research Group, < http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/home.htm >, accessed 26 February 2007
42. Rummel, Rudolph J. 1994. Death by government, New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books.
43. Sageman, Marc. 2004. Understanding terror networks, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
44. Sedgwick, Mark. 2004. Al-Qaeda and the nature of religious terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 16 (4): 795–814.
45. Selcuk, Gultasli (2006) ‘EU removes “Islamic terrorism” from its dictionary’, Zaman Online, 12 April, < http://www.zaman.com/?bl = international&alt = &hn = 31952 (http://www.zaman.com/?bl=international&alt=&hn=31952) >, accessed 22 May 2006
46. Silberstein, Sandra. 2002. War of words: language, politics and 9/11, London: Routledge.
47. Silke, Andrew. 1998. Cheshire-cat logic: the recurring theme of terrorist abnormality in psychological research. Psychology, Crime and Law, 4: 51–69.
48. Sluka, Jeffrey. 2000. “ Introduction: state terror and anthropology ”. In Death squad: the anthropology of state terror, Edited by: Sluka, Jeffrey. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
49. Sprinzak, Ehud. 1998. The great superterrorism scare. Foreign Policy, 112: 110–124.
50. White House, The, Office of the Press Secretary (2005) ‘US-EU declaration on enhancing cooperation in the field of non-proliferation and the fight against terrorism’, 20 June, < http://www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/or/48380.htm >, accessed 22 May 2006
51. Wiktorowicz, Quintan, and Kaltner, John. 2003. Killing in the name of Islam: Al-Qaeda's justification for September 11. Middle East Policy, 10 (2): 76–92.
52. Winkler, Carol. 2006. In the name of terrorism: presidents on political violence in the post-World War II era, Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
53. Yee, Albert. 1996. The causal effects of ideas on politics. International Organization, 50 (1): 69–108.
54. Zimmermann, Doron. 2006. The European Union and post-9/11 counterterrorism: a reappraisal. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29: 123–145.