Mapping the primary outcomes reported in cochrane systematic reviews regarding stroke with the international Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domains: Current trend and future recommendations

European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2019, Pages 378-383

  Engkasan, Julia P ^a   Ahmad Fauzi, Aishah ^a   Sabirin, Sakinah ^a   Chai, Chau C ^a,b   Abdul Malek, Izwan Z ^a,c   Liguori, Sara ^d   Moretti, Antimo ^d   Gimigliano, Francesca ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY MALAYA MEDICAL CENTRE   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK   (Malaysia)

^c UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^d SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

Author keywords

Clinical decision making; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; STROKE REHABILITATION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT, HEALTH CARE; STROKE REHABILITATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85067270335     PISSN: 19739087     EISSN: 19739095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05792-7     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Uman LS. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2011;20:57-9.
2. Useem J, Brennan A, LaValley M, Vickery M, Ameli O, Reinen N, et al. Systematic differences between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane meta-analyses on the same topic: A matched pair analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0144980.
3. Cochrane Strategy to. 2020; 2014 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cochrane.org/sites/default/files/public/uploads/pdf/strategy_to_2020_22june2016.pdf [cited 2019, Jan12].
4. Higgins JP, Green S. Prioritizing outcomes: main, primary and secondary outcomes of Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0.; [Internet]. Available from: https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/chapter_5/5_4_2_prioritizing_outcomes_main_primary_ and_secondary_outcomes.htm [cited 2019, Jan 12].
5. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
6. Meyer T, Gutenbrunner C, Bickenbach J, Cieza A, Melvin J, Stucki G. Towards a conceptual description of rehabilitation as a health strategy. J Rehabil Med 2011;43:765-9.
7. Gimigliano F, Negrini S. The World Health Organization “Rehabilitation 2030: a call for action”. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017;53:155-68.
8. Browser IC. [Internet]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/ [cited 2019, Jan 12].
9. English C, Hillier SL, Lynch EA. Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;6:CD007513.
10. Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Elsner B. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;8:CD002840.
11. Pollock A, Gray C, Culham E, Durward BR, Langhorne P. Interventions for improving sit-to-stand ability following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;5:CD007232.
12. West C, Hesketh A, Vail A, Bowen A. Interventions for apraxia of speech following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;4:CD004298.
13. George S, Crotty M, Gelinas I, Devos H. Rehabilitation for improving automobile driving after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;2:CD008357.
14. Krishnamurthi RV, Moran AE, Feigin VL, Barker-Collo S, Norrving B, Mensah GA, et al.; GBD 2013 Stroke Panel Experts Group. Stroke prevalence, mortality and disability-adjusted life years in adults aged 20-64 years in 1990-2013: Data from the Global Burden of Disease 2013 Study. Neuroepidemiology 2015;45:190-202.
15. Ganesh A, Luengo-Fernandez R, Wharton RM, Gutnikov SA, Silver LE, Mehta Z, et al.; Oxford Vascular Study. Time Course of Evolution of Disability and Cause-Specific Mortality After Ischemic Stroke: Implications for Trial Design. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6:e005788.
16. Liu B, Tan Y, Wang D, Liu M. Puerarin for ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;2:CD004955.
17. Yang W, Shi Z, Yang HQ, Teng J, Zhao J, Xiang G. Mailuoning for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;1:CD007028.
18. Yang A, Wu HM, Tang JL, Xu L, Yang M, Liu GJ. Acupuncture for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;8:CD004131.
19. Crichton SL, Bray BD, McKevitt C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Patient outcomes up to 15 years after stroke: survival, disability, quality of life, cognition and mental health. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016;87:1091-8.
20. Silva SM, Corrêa FI, Faria CD, Buchalla CM, Silva PF, Corrêa JC. Evaluation of post-stroke functionality based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: a proposal for use of assessment tools. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27:1665-70.
21. Mudge S, Stott NS. Outcome measures to assess walking ability following stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Physiotherapy 2007;93:189-200.
22. Salter K, Campbell N, Richardson M, Mehta S, Jutai J, Zettler L, et al. Outcome measure in stroke rehabilitation. Evidence Review; [Internet]. Available from: www.ebsr.com/evidence-review [cited 2019, Jan 12].
23. Freemantle N, Calvert M, Wood J, Eastaugh J, Griffin C. Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty? JAMA 2003;289:2554-9.
24. Vloothuis JD, Mulder M, Veerbeek JM, Konijnenbelt M, Visser-Meily JM, Ket JC, et al. Caregiver-mediated exercises for improving outcomes after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;12:CD011058.
25. Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, Langhorne P, Mead GE, Mehrholz J, et al. Cochrane Overview interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Stroke 2015;46:E57-8.
26. Veerbeek JM, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EE, Ket JC, Heymans MW. Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 2011;42:1482-8.
27. Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Functioning: the third health indicator in the health system and the key indicator for rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017;53:134-8.
28. Wallace SJ, Rose T, Le Dorze G. Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health to identify outcome domains for a core outcome set for aphasia: a comparison of stakeholder perspectives. Disabil Rehabil 2017;12:1-10.
29. Oltman R, Neises G, Scheible D, Mehrtens G, Grüneberg C. ICF components of corresponding outcome measures in flexor tendon rehabilitation - a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:139.
30. Schiariti V, Klassen AF, Cieza A, Sauve K, O'Donnell M, Armstrong R, et al. Comparing contents of outcome measures in cerebral palsy using the International Classification of Functioning (ICF-CY): a systematic review. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2014;18:1-12.
31. Gordon AL. Functioning and disability after stroke in children: using the ICF-CY to classify health outcome and inform future clinical research priorities. Dev Med Child Neurol 2014;56:434-44.