Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 57-59

  Uman, Lindsay S ^a  

^a IWK HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA EXTRACTION; EFFECT SIZE; HYPOTHESIS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PEER REVIEW; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC);

EID: 79952679424     PISSN: 17198429     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Jadad, A. R, Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., et al. (1996). Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Controlled Clinical Trials, 17, 1-12.
2. Petticrew, M. & Roberts, H. (year). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
3. Uman, L.S., Chambers, C. T., McGrath, P. J., & Kisely, S. (2010). Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials examining psychological interventions for pediatric procedural pain: Recommendations for quality improvement. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 35, 693-703.
4. Uman, L. S., Chambers, C. T., McGrath, P. J., & Kisely, S. (2008). A systematic review of randomized controlled trials examining psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents: An abbreviated Cochrane review. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 33, 842-854.