-
1
-
-
84899707815
-
Causes for the persistence of impact factor mania
-
Casadevall A & Fang FC (2014). Causes for the persistence of impact factor mania. mBio 5, e00064–00014.
-
(2014)
mBio
, vol.5
, pp. e00064-e00014
-
-
Casadevall, A.1
Fang, F.C.2
-
2
-
-
84946607114
-
Impacted science: impact is not importance
-
Casadevall A & Fang FC (2015). Impacted science: impact is not importance. mBio 6, e01593–01515.
-
(2015)
mBio
, vol.6
, pp. e01593-e01515
-
-
Casadevall, A.1
Fang, F.C.2
-
3
-
-
85023756946
-
Scientific citations favor positive results: a systematic review and meta-analysis
-
Duyx B, Urlings MJE, Swaen GMH, Bouter LM & Zeegers MP (2017). Scientific citations favor positive results: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 88, 92–101.
-
(2017)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.88
, pp. 92-101
-
-
Duyx, B.1
Urlings, M.J.E.2
Swaen, G.M.H.3
Bouter, L.M.4
Zeegers, M.P.5
-
4
-
-
80855164967
-
Retracted science and the retraction index
-
Fang FC & Casadevall A (2011). Retracted science and the retraction index. Infect Immun 79, 3855–3859.
-
(2011)
Infect Immun
, vol.79
, pp. 3855-3859
-
-
Fang, F.C.1
Casadevall, A.2
-
5
-
-
29944438252
-
The history and meaning of the journal impact factor
-
Garfield E (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA 295, 90–93.
-
(2006)
JAMA
, vol.295
, pp. 90-93
-
-
Garfield, E.1
-
6
-
-
29944435742
-
-
&, Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, PA, USA
-
Garfield E & Sher IH (1963). Genetics Citation Index. In http://wwwgarfieldlibraryupennedu/essays/v7p515y1984pdf. Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
-
(1963)
Genetics Citation Index
-
-
Garfield, E.1
Sher, I.H.2
-
7
-
-
85032974875
-
Explicit bias toward high-income-country research: A randomized, blinded, crossover experiment of English clinicians
-
Harris M, Marti J, Watt H, Bhatti Y, Macinko J & Darzi AW (2017). Explicit bias toward high-income-country research: A randomized, blinded, crossover experiment of English clinicians. Health Aff (Millwood) 36, 1997–2004.
-
(2017)
Health Aff (Millwood)
, vol.36
, pp. 1997-2004
-
-
Harris, M.1
Marti, J.2
Watt, H.3
Bhatti, Y.4
Macinko, J.5
Darzi, A.W.6
-
8
-
-
84992036188
-
Citation bias favoring positive clinical trials of thrombolytics for acute ischemic stroke: a cross-sectional analysis
-
Misemer BS, Platts-Mills TF & Jones CW (2016). Citation bias favoring positive clinical trials of thrombolytics for acute ischemic stroke: a cross-sectional analysis. Trials 17, 473.
-
(2016)
Trials
, vol.17
, pp. 473
-
-
Misemer, B.S.1
Platts-Mills, T.F.2
Jones, C.W.3
-
9
-
-
84855611836
-
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research
-
Morris ZS, Wooding S & Grant J (2011). The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med 104, 510–520.
-
(2011)
J R Soc Med
, vol.104
, pp. 510-520
-
-
Morris, Z.S.1
Wooding, S.2
Grant, J.3
-
10
-
-
85065797272
-
-
accessed 1/3/2019
-
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) (2012). https://sfdora.org/; accessed 1/3/2019.
-
, Issue.2012
-
-
-
11
-
-
0031049280
-
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
-
Seglen PO (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314, 498–502.
-
(1997)
BMJ
, vol.314
, pp. 498-502
-
-
Seglen, P.O.1
|