-
1
-
-
29944438252
-
The history and meaning of the journal impact factor
-
Garfield E. 2006. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA 295:90-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90.
-
(2006)
JAMA
, vol.295
, pp. 90-93
-
-
Garfield, E.1
-
2
-
-
84899707815
-
Causes for the persistence of impact factor mania
-
Casadevall A, Fang FC. 2014. Causes for the persistence of impact factor mania. mBio 5:e00064-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00064-14.
-
(2014)
Mbio
, vol.5
-
-
Casadevall, A.1
Fang, F.C.2
-
3
-
-
84883803010
-
Citation opportunity cost of the high impact factor obsession
-
Şekercioğlu CH. 2013. Citation opportunity cost of the high impact factor obsession. Curr Biol 23:R701-R702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.cub.2013.07.065.
-
(2013)
Curr Biol
, vol.23
, pp. R701-R702
-
-
Şekercioğlu, C.H.1
-
5
-
-
84901315137
-
Are current research evaluation metrics causing a tragedy of the scientific commons and the extinction of university-based fisheries programs?
-
Arlinghaus R. 2014. Are current research evaluation metrics causing a tragedy of the scientific commons and the extinction of university-based fisheries programs? Fisheries 39:212-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 03632415.2014.903837.
-
(2014)
Fisheries
, vol.39
, pp. 212-215
-
-
Arlinghaus, R.1
-
6
-
-
0031049280
-
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
-
Seglen PO. 1997. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314:498-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ bmj.314.7079.497.
-
(1997)
BMJ
, vol.314
, pp. 498-502
-
-
Seglen, P.O.1
-
7
-
-
0038700818
-
Challenging the tyranny of impact factors
-
Colquhoun D. 2003. Challenging the tyranny of impact factors. Nature 423:479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/423479a.
-
(2003)
Nature
, vol.423
, pp. 479
-
-
Colquhoun, D.1
-
8
-
-
34547604174
-
8. Lawrence PA. 2007. The mismeasurement of science
-
Lawrence PA. 2007. The mismeasurement of science. Curr Biol 17: R583-R585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.014.
-
Curr Biol
, vol.17
, pp. R583-R585
-
-
-
9
-
-
84933675226
-
Deep impact: Unintended consequences of journal rank
-
Brembs B, Button K, Munafò M. 2013. Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Front Hum Neurosci 7:291. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291.
-
(2013)
Front Hum Neurosci
, vol.7
, pp. 291
-
-
Brembs, B.1
Button, K.2
Munafò, M.3
-
10
-
-
51949113923
-
Descriptive science
-
Casadevall A, Fang FC. 2008. Descriptive science. Infect Immun 76: 3835-3836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00743-08.
-
(2008)
Infect Immun
, vol.76
, pp. 3835-3836
-
-
Casadevall, A.1
Fang, F.C.2
-
11
-
-
69049112935
-
Mechanistic science
-
Casadevall A, Fang FC. 2009. Mechanistic science. Infect Immun 77: 3517-3519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00623-09.
-
(2009)
Infect Immun
, vol.77
, pp. 3517-3519
-
-
Casadevall, A.1
Fang, F.C.2
-
12
-
-
70349420963
-
Important science—it’s all about the SPIN
-
Casadevall A, Fang FC. 2009. Important science—it’s all about the SPIN. Infect Immun 77:4177-4180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00757-09.
-
(2009)
Infect Immun
, vol.77
, pp. 4177-4180
-
-
Casadevall, A.1
Fang, F.C.2
-
13
-
-
84896474732
-
Specialized science
-
Fang FC, Casadevall A. 2013. Specialized science. Infect Immun 82: 1355-1360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01530-13.
-
(2013)
Infect Immun
, vol.82
, pp. 1355-1360
-
-
Fang, F.C.1
Casadevall, A.2
-
15
-
-
84925372773
-
Competitive science: Is competition ruining science?
-
Fang FC, Casadevall A. 2015. Competitive science: is competition ruining science? Infect Immun 83:1229-1233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ IAI.02939-14.
-
(2015)
Infect Immun
, vol.83
, pp. 1229-1233
-
-
Fang, F.C.1
Casadevall, A.2
-
16
-
-
84949670790
-
-
4 September, posting date. (A)historical science
-
Casadevall A, Fang FC. 14 September 2015, posting date. (A)historical science. Infect Immun. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00921.15.
-
(2015)
Infect Immun
-
-
Casadevall, A.1
Fang, F.C.2
-
17
-
-
84946552631
-
Field science—the nature and utility of scientific fields
-
Casadevall A, Fang FC. 2015. Field science—the nature and utility of scientific fields. mBio 6:e01259-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ mBio.01259-15.
-
(2015)
Mbio
, vol.6
-
-
Casadevall, A.1
Fang, F.C.2
-
18
-
-
84885750154
-
-
Science publishing: the golden club
-
Reich ES. 2013. Science publishing: the golden club. Nature 502:291-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/502291a.
-
(2013)
Nature
, vol.502
, pp. 291-293
-
-
Reich, E.S.1
-
19
-
-
84946545496
-
Why we cheat
-
Fang FC, Casadevall A. 2013. Why we cheat. Sci Am Mind 24:31-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamericanmind0513-30.
-
(2013)
Sci am Mind
, vol.24
, pp. 31-37
-
-
Fang, F.C.1
Casadevall, A.2
-
20
-
-
84867637990
-
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
-
Fang FC, Steen RG, Casadevall A. 2012. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:17028-17033. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109.
-
(2012)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
, vol.109
, pp. 17028-17033
-
-
Fang, F.C.1
Steen, R.G.2
Casadevall, A.3
-
21
-
-
84904726515
-
Sources of error in the retracted scientific literature
-
Casadevall A, Steen RG, Fang FC. 2014. Sources of error in the retracted scientific literature. FASEB J 28:3847-3855. http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/ fj.14-256735.
-
(2014)
FASEB J
, vol.28
, pp. 3847-3855
-
-
Casadevall, A.1
Steen, R.G.2
Fang, F.C.3
-
22
-
-
80855164967
-
Retracted science and the retraction index
-
Fang FC, Casadevall A. 2011. Retracted science and the retraction index. Infect Immun 79:3855-3859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.05661-11.
-
(2011)
Infect Immun
, vol.79
, pp. 3855-3859
-
-
Fang, F.C.1
Casadevall, A.2
-
23
-
-
84859169880
-
Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
-
Begley CG, Ellis LM. 2012. Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 483:531-533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ 483531a.
-
(2012)
Nature
, vol.483
, pp. 531-533
-
-
Begley, C.G.1
Ellis, L.M.2
-
24
-
-
82955236217
-
Toward a new model of scientific publishing: Discussion and a proposal
-
Kravitz DJ, Baker CI. 2011. Toward a new model of scientific publishing: discussion and a proposal. Front Comput Neurosci 5:55. http:// dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2011.00055.
-
(2011)
Front Comput Neurosci
, vol.5
, pp. 55
-
-
Kravitz, D.J.1
Baker, C.I.2
-
25
-
-
40949110644
-
Article and journal impact factor in various scientific fields
-
Falagas ME, Charitidou E, Alexiou VG. 2008. Article and journal impact factor in various scientific fields. Am J Med Sci 335:188-191. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318145abb9.
-
(2008)
Am J Med Sci
, vol.335
, pp. 188-191
-
-
Falagas, M.E.1
Charitidou, E.2
Alexiou, V.G.3
-
26
-
-
77952360033
-
-
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Accessed 17 September 2015
-
Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Dictionaries Online. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. http:// dictionary.cambridge.org/. Accessed 17 September 2015.
-
Cambridge Dictionaries Online
-
-
Cambridge University Press1
-
27
-
-
0003924378
-
-
Merriam-Webster, Springfield MA, Accessed 17 September 2015
-
Merriam-Webster Inc. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Merriam-Webster, Springfield MA. http://www.merriam-webster.com. Accessed 17 September 2015.
-
Merriam-Webster Dictionary
-
-
Merriam-Webster Inc1
-
28
-
-
84908408866
-
The top 100 papers
-
Van Noorden R, Maher B, Nuzzo R. 2014. The top 100 papers. Nature 514:550-553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/514550a.
-
(2014)
Nature
, vol.514
, pp. 550-553
-
-
Van Noorden, R.1
Maher, B.2
Nuzzo, R.3
-
29
-
-
84908403153
-
Bibliometrics: Is your most cited work your best?
-
Ioannidis JPA, Boyack KW, Small H, Sorensen AA, Klavans R. 2014. Bibliometrics: is your most cited work your best? Nature 514:561-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/514561a.
-
(2014)
Nature
, vol.514
, pp. 561-562
-
-
Ioannidis, J.1
Boyack, K.W.2
Small, H.3
Sorensen, A.A.4
Klavans, R.5
-
30
-
-
0038497542
-
Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid
-
Watson JD, Crick FHC. 1953. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171:737-738. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/171737a0.
-
(1953)
Nature
, vol.171
, pp. 737-738
-
-
Watson, J.D.1
Crick, F.H.C.2
-
31
-
-
0002781574
-
Versuche über Plflanzenhybriden. Verhandlungen des Natureforschenden Vereines in Brünn, Bd. IV für das Jahr 1965
-
Mendel G. 1866. Versuche über Plflanzenhybriden. Verhandlungen des Natureforschenden Vereines in Brünn, Bd. IV für das Jahr 1965. Abhandlungen 3-47.
-
(1866)
Abhandlungen
, pp. 3-47
-
-
Mendel, G.1
-
32
-
-
84946553891
-
Another reference to Mendel before 1900
-
Edwardson JR. 1962. Another reference to Mendel before 1900. J Hered 53:152.
-
(1962)
J Hered
, vol.53
, pp. 152
-
-
Edwardson, J.R.1
-
33
-
-
79957945423
-
A bacterium that can grow by using arsenic instead of phosphorus
-
Wolfe-Simon F, Blum JS, Kulp TR, Gordon GW, Hoeft SE, Pett-Ridge J, Stolz JF, Webb SM, Weber PK, Davies PCW, Anbar AD, Oremland RS. 2011. A bacterium that can grow by using arsenic instead of phosphorus. Science 332:1163-1166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1197258.
-
(2011)
Science
, vol.332
, pp. 1163-1166
-
-
Wolfe-Simon, F.1
Blum, J.S.2
Kulp, T.R.3
Gordon, G.W.4
Hoeft, S.E.5
Pett-Ridge, J.6
Stolz, J.F.7
Webb, S.M.8
Weber, P.K.9
Davies, P.C.W.10
Anbar, A.D.11
Oremland, R.S.12
-
34
-
-
84864346138
-
Absence of detectable arsenate inDNAfrom arsenate-grown GFAJ-1 cells
-
Reaves ML, Sinha S, Rabinowitz JD, Kruglyak L, Redfield RJ. 2012. Absence of detectable arsenate inDNAfrom arsenate-grown GFAJ-1 cells. Science 337:470-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1219861.
-
(2012)
Science
, vol.337
, pp. 470-473
-
-
Reaves, M.L.1
Sinha, S.2
Rabinowitz, J.D.3
Kruglyak, L.4
Redfield, R.J.5
-
35
-
-
84865207891
-
Growth of a bacterium that apparently uses arsenic instead of phosphorus is a consequence of massive ribosome breakdown
-
Basturea GN, Harris TK, Deutscher MP. 2012. Growth of a bacterium that apparently uses arsenic instead of phosphorus is a consequence of massive ribosome breakdown. J Biol Chem 287:28816-28819. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C112.394403.
-
(2012)
J Biol Chem
, vol.287
, pp. 28816-28819
-
-
Basturea, G.N.1
Harris, T.K.2
Deutscher, M.P.3
-
36
-
-
84989592287
-
Uncitedness in the biomedical literature
-
Stern RE. 1990. Uncitedness in the biomedical literature. J Am Soc Inf Sci 41:193-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199004)41:3_193::AID-ASI5_3.0.CO;2-B.
-
(1990)
J am Soc Inf Sci
, vol.41
, pp. 193-196
-
-
Stern, R.E.1
-
37
-
-
84946564090
-
The fall of uncitedness
-
Vienna, Austria
-
Lariviere V, Archambault E, Gingras Y, Wallace ML. 2008. The fall of uncitedness, p 279-282. In Abstracts of the 10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Vienna, Austria.
-
(2008)
10Th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators
, pp. 279-282
-
-
Lariviere, V.1
Archambault, E.2
Gingras, Y.3
Wallace, M.L.4
-
38
-
-
84942636492
-
Is it possible to recognize a major scientific discovery?
-
Ioannidis JPA. 2015. Is it possible to recognize a major scientific discovery? JAMA 314:1135-1137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.9629.
-
(2015)
JAMA
, vol.314
, pp. 1135-1137
-
-
Ioannidis, J.1
-
39
-
-
84893353001
-
-
Retrospective. Frederick Sanger (1918-2013)
-
Brenner S. 2014. Retrospective. Frederick Sanger (1918-2013). Science 343:262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1249912.
-
(2014)
Science
, vol.343
, pp. 262
-
-
Brenner, S.1
-
40
-
-
84941254141
-
Increasing disparities between resource inputs and outcomes, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical research
-
Bowen A, Casadevall A. 2015. Increasing disparities between resource inputs and outcomes, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical research. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:11335-11340. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504955112.
-
(2015)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
, vol.112
, pp. 11335-11340
-
-
Bowen, A.1
Casadevall, A.2
-
41
-
-
84879997846
-
The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment
-
Cagan R. 2013. The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. Dis Model Mech 6:869-870. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.012955.
-
(2013)
Dis Model Mech
, vol.6
, pp. 869-870
-
-
Cagan, R.1
-
42
-
-
84879046591
-
Reforming research assessment
-
Schekman R, Patterson M. 2013. Reforming research assessment. Elife 2:e00855. http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00855.
-
(2013)
Elife
, vol.2
-
-
Schekman, R.1
Patterson, M.2
-
43
-
-
84887085163
-
We have met the enemy, and it is us
-
Johnston M. 2013. We have met the enemy, and it is us. Genetics 194: 791-792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.153486.
-
(2013)
Genetics
, vol.194
, pp. 791-792
-
-
Johnston, M.1
-
45
-
-
84868215130
-
The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers’ citation in the digital age
-
Lozano GA, Larivière V, Gingras Y. 2012. The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers’ citation in the digital age. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 63:2140-2145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22731.
-
(2012)
J am Soc Inf Sci Technol
, vol.63
, pp. 2140-2145
-
-
Lozano, G.A.1
Larivière, V.2
Gingras, Y.3
-
46
-
-
50649088599
-
The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation
-
Falagas ME, Alexiou VG. 2008. The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 56:223-226. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00005-008-0024-5.
-
(2008)
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)
, vol.56
, pp. 223-226
-
-
Falagas, M.E.1
Alexiou, V.G.2
-
47
-
-
0037024313
-
Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals
-
Callaham M, Wears RL, Weber E. 2002. Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA 287:2847-2850.
-
(2002)
JAMA
, vol.287
, pp. 2847-2850
-
-
Callaham, M.1
Wears, R.L.2
Weber, E.3
-
48
-
-
0014403118
-
The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered
-
Merton RK. 1968. The Matthew effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159:56-63. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56.
-
(1968)
Science
, vol.159
, pp. 56-63
-
-
Merton, R.K.1
-
49
-
-
0014403118
-
The Matthew Effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered
-
Merton RK. 1968. The Matthew Effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159(3810):56-63.
-
(1968)
Science
, vol.159
, Issue.3810
, pp. 56-63
-
-
Merton, R.K.1
-
50
-
-
76649129067
-
The impact factor’s Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics
-
Larivière V, Gingras Y. 2010. The impact factor’s Matthew Effect: a natural experiment in bibliometrics. J Assoc Information Sci Technol 61(2): 424-427.
-
(2010)
J Assoc Information Sci Technol
, vol.61
, Issue.2
, pp. 424-427
-
-
Larivière, V.1
Gingras, Y.2
|