Domains of use or subjectivity? The distribution of three dutch causal connectives explained

Cause - Condition - Concession - Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 57-82

  Maat, Henk Pander ^a   Sanders, Ted ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85065285041     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110219043.1.57     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Ariel, Mira 1988 Referring and accessibility. Journal ofLinguistics 24: 65-87.
2. Bateman, John A. and Rondhuis, Klaas-Jan 1997 Coherence relations: towards a general specification. Discourse Processes 24: 3-49.
3. Coates, Jennifer 1983 The semantics ofmodal auxiliaries. Beckenham: Croom Helm.
4. Cornelis, Louise H. 1997 Passive and perspective. AmsterdamlAtlanta: Rodopi.
5. Degand, Liesbeth 1998 Het ideationele gebruik van want en omdat. [The Ideational Use of want and omdat]. Nederlandse Taalkunde 4: 309-326.
6. Degand, Liesbeth and Henk Pander Maat 1999 Scaling causal relations in terms of speaker involvement. In: Levels of Representation in Discourse, 45-53. Working notes of the International Workshop on Text Representation. University of Edinburgh.
7. Fauconnier, Gilles 1994 Mental spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Fauconnier, Gilles and Eve Sweetser (eds.). 1996 Spaces, worlds and grammars. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Gtinthner, Susanne 1993 "…weil-man kann es ja wissenschaftlich untersuchen"Diskurspragmatische Aspekte der WortstellUng in WEIL-Satzen. Linguistische Berichte 143: 37-59.
10. Halliday, M.A.K. and Ruqaiya Hasan 1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
11. Hanks, William F. 1992 The indexical ground of deictic reference. In: Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin (eds.) Rethinking context. Language as an interactive phenomenon, 43-76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Keller, Rudi 1995 The epistemic weiJ. In: Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds.) Subjectivity and subjectivisation. Linguistic perspectives, 16-30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Knott, Alistair and Robert Dale 1994 Using linguistic phenomena to motivate•a set of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 18: 35-62.
14. Knott, Alistair and Ted Sanders 1998 The categorization of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: an exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 135-175.
15. Knott, Alistair 2000 Semantic and pragmatic relations and their intended effects. In: Ted Sanders, Joost Schilperoord and Wilbert Spooren (eds.), Cognitive approaches to coherence. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
16. Kortmann, Bernd 1997 Adverbial subordination. A typology and history of adverbial subordinators based on European languages. BerlinlNew York: Mouton de Gruyter.
17. Langacker, Ronald W. 1985 Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In: John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, 109-150. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
18. Langacker, Ronald W. 1990 Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 5-38.
19. Lemke, Jay L. 1998 Resources for attitudinal meaning. In: Functions ofLanguage 5: 3356. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
20. Lyons, John 1977 Semantics 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Mann, William C. and Sandra A. Thompson 1988 Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8: 243-28J.
22. Martin, J. R. 1992 English text. System and structure. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
23. Moore, Johanna D. and Martha E. Pollack 1992 A problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis. Computational Linguistics 18: 537-544.
24. Németh, Enikó 1995 On the role of pragmatic connectives in Hungarian spoken discourses. In: B. Warvik, S-K. Tanskanen and R. Hiltunen (eds.), Organization in discourse. Proceedings from the Turku conference, 393-402. Anglicana Turkuensia 14.
25. Nuyts, Jan 1994 Epistemic modal qualifications: on their linguistic and conceptual structure. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 8J. Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen.
26. Nuyts, Jan 1992 Subjective vs. objective modality: what’s the difference? In: Fortescue, Michael D., Peter Harder and Lars Kristoffersen (eds.), Layered structure and reference in a functional perspective, 73-99. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
27. Oversteegen, Leonoor E. 1997 On the pragmatic nature of causal and contrastive connectives. Discourse Processes 24: 51-85.
28. Pander Maat, Henk 1998 Classifying negative coherence relations on the basis of linguistic evidence. Journal ofPragmatics 30: 177-204.
29. Pander Maat, Henk 1999 The differential linguistic realization of comparative and additive coherence relations. Cognitive Linguistics 10: 147-184.
30. Pander Maat, Henk and Ted Sanders 1995 Nederlandse causale connectieven en het onderscheid tussen inhoudelijke en epistemische coherentie-relaties. [Dutch causal connectives and the distinction between content and epistemic coherence relations.] Leuvense Bijdragen 84: 349-374.
31. Pit, Mirna 1997 Subjective and objective construal in coherence relations. Jan Don and Ted Sanders (eds.), Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS Yearbook 1997, 45-7J. Utrecht: UiL OTS.
32. Rossari, Corinne and Jaques Jayez 1996 Donc et les consecutifs. Des systemes de contraintes differentiels. Lingvisticte Investigationes XX: 117-143. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
33. Sanders, Jose and Gisela Redeker 1996 Perspective and the representation of speech and thought in narrative discourse. In: Gilles Fauconnier and Eve Sweetser (eds.), Spaces, worlds and grammars, 290-317. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Sanders, Jose and Wilbert Spooren 1997 Perspective, subjectivity and modality from a cognitive linguistic point of view. In: Wolf-Andreas Liebert, G. Redeker and L. Waugh(eds.), Discourse and perspective in cognitive linguistics, 85-112. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
35. Sanders, Ted 1997 Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence. On the categorization of coherence relations in context. Discourse Processes 24: 119-147.
36. Sanders, Ted JM., Wilbert P.M.Spooren, and Leo G.M. Noordman 1992 Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 15:1-35.
37. Sanders, Ted and Wilbert Spooren 1999 Communicative intentions and coherence relations. In: W. Bublitz, U. Lenk and E. Ventola (eds.), Coherence in spoken and writtendiscourse, 235-250. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
38. Stein, Dieter and Susan Wright (eds.)1995 Subjectivity and subjectivisation. Linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Stukker, Ninke, Ted Sanders and Arie Verhagen 1999 Waar een wil is, is geen wet. De categorisering van causale relatiesbinnen en tussen zinnen. [When there is a will, there is no law. The categorization of causal relations within and between sentences.]Gramma / TIT 7: 66-86.
40. Sweetser, Eve E. 1990 From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Uitden Boogaart, Pieter C. 1975 Woordfrequenties in geschreven en gesproken Nederlands. [Word frequencies in written and spoken Dutch. ] Utrecht: Oosthoek, Scheltema and Hoekema.
42. Verhagen, Arie 1995 Subjectification, syntax and communication. In: Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation, 103-128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.