Classifying negative coherence relations on the basis of linguistic evidence

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 177-204

  Pander Maat, Henk ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032134925     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00024-1     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Bateman, John and Klaas J. Rondhuis, 1997. Coherence relations: Towards a general specification. Discourse Processes 24: 3-49.
2. Fauconnier, Gilles, 1985. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Bradford.
3. Halliday, Michael A.K., 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
4. Halliday, Michael A.K. and Ruqaiya Hasan, 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
5. Jordan, Michael P., 1985. Some relations of expectation and surprise in English. In: R. Hall jr., ed., The Eleventh Lacus Forum 1984, 263-273. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam.
6. Jordan, Michael P., 1992. An integrated three-pronged analysis of a fund-raising letter. In: W.C. Mann and S.A. Thompson, eds., Discourse description. Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text, 171-227. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
7. Knott, Alistair and Robert Dale, 1994. Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 18: 35-64.
8. König, Ekkehard, 1988. Concessive connectives and concessive sentences: Cross-linguistic regularities and pragmatic principles. In: J.A. Hawkins, ed., Explaining language universals, 145-166. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Lakoff, Robin, 1971. If's, and's and but's about conjunction. In: C.J. Fillmore and D.T. Langendoen, eds., Studies in linguistic semantics, 114-149. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
10. Mann, William C. and Sandra A. Thompson, 1988. Rhetorical structure theory. Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 8: 243-281.
11. Martin, John R., 1992. English text. System and structure. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
12. Meyer, Bonnie J.F., 1975. The organization of proces and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
13. Pander Maat, Henk and Ted J.M. Sanders, 1995. Nederlandse causale connectieven en het onderscheid tussen inhoudelijke en epistemische coherentie-relaties. (Dutch causal connectives and the distinctioin between content and episiemic coherence relations.) Leuvense Bijdragen 84: 1-26.
14. Peterson, Carole, 1986. Semantic and pragmatic uses of 'but'. Journal of Child Language 13: 583-590.
15. Sanders, José, 1994. Perspective in narrative discourse. Ph.D. dissertation, Tilburg University.
16. Sanders, Ted J.M., Wilbert P.M. Spooren and Leo G.M. Noordman, 1992. Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 15: 1-35.
17. Sanders, Ted J.M., Wilbert P.M. Spooren and Leo G.M. Noordman, 1993. Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 93-133.
18. Sandra, Dominiek and Sally Rice, 1995. Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind - the linguist's or the language user's? Cognitive Linguistics 6: 89-130.
19. Spooren, Wilbert P.M., 1989. Some aspects of the form and interpretation of global contrastive coherence relations. Ph.D. dissertation, Nijmegen University.
20. Spooren, Wilbert P.M. and Joep Jaspers, 1990. Tekstoperaties en tekstperspectieven. (Discourse operations and discourse perspectives.) Gramma 14: 195-220.
21. Sweetser, Eve E., 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Van Belle, William and Goedele Devroy, 1992. Tegenstellende en toegevende connectoren: Een argumentatieve beschrijving. Leuven, KUL, Departement Linguïstiek, Preprint 143.
23. Van Dijk, Teun A., 1977. Text and context. Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. Londen: Longman.