Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context

Discourse Processes

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 119-147

  Sanders, Ted ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942597358     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638539709545009     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bentum, A. van (1995). Semantische en pragmatische coherentie-relaties. Tekstanalytisch en experimenteel ondenoek. [Semantic and pragmatic coherence relations. Text- analytic and experimental research]. Unpublished master's thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
2. Bergh, H. van den (1990). On the construct-validity of multiple-choice items for reading comprehension. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 1-12
3. Brewer, W.F. (1980). Literary theory, rhetoric, and stylistics: Implications for psychology. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce & W.F. Brewer (Eds.). Tlieoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 221-239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
4. Dijk, T.A. van (1977). Text and context. New York: Longman
5. Fienberg, S.E. (1980). the analysis of cross-classified categorical data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
6. Grosz, B.J. & Sidner, C.L. (1986). Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12, 175-204
7. Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman
8. Hobbs, J.R. (1990). Literature and cognition. Menlo Park, CA: CSLI
9. Hovy, E.H. (1990). Parsimonious and profligate approaches to the question of discourse structure relations. In J. Moore (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on Natural Language Generation (pp. 128-136). Pittsburgh: ACL
10. Hovy, E.H. & Maier, E. (1995). Parsimonious or profligate: how many and which discourse structure relations? Manuscript, submitted for publication
11. Knott, A. & Dale, R. (1994). Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 18, 35-62
12. Knott, A. & Sanders, T. (1998). The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics, to appear
13. Longacre, R.E. (1976). An anatomy of speech notions. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press
14. Mann, W.C., & Thompson, S.A. (1986). Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse Processes, 9,57-90
15. - (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8, 243-281
16. Martin, J.R. (1992). English text: systems and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins
17. Meyer, B.J.F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effect on memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland
18. Moore, J.D. & Pollack, M.E. (1992). A problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis. Computational Linguistics, 18, 537-544
19. Pander Maat, H.L.W. (1994a). Tekstanalyse. Een pragmatische benadering. [Text analysis. A pragmatic approach.] Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff
20. - (1994b). Coherentie-relaties hebben zowel semantische als pragmatische aspecten. [Coherence relations have both semantic and pragmatic aspects]. In: A. Maes, P. van Hauwermeiren & L. van Waes (Eds.) Perspectieven in taalbeheers- ingsonderzoek (pp. 118-129). Dordrecht: ICG
21. - (1998). Classifying negative coherence relations on the basis of linguistic evidence. Journal of Pragmatics, to appear
22. Pander Maat, H. & Sanders, T. (1995). Nederlandse causale connectieven en het onder- scheid tussen inhoudelijke en epistemische coherentie-relaties. [Dutch causal connectives and the difference between content and epistemic coherence relations]. Leuvense Bijdragen, 349-374
23. Redeker, G. (1990). Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 305-319
24. Sanders, J.M. (1994). Perspective in narrative discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
25. Sanders, T.J.M. (1992). Discourse structure and coherence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
26. Sanders, T. (1994). Verschillende coherentie-relaties in verschillende teksttypen. [Different coherence relations in different text types.] In: A. Maes, P. van Hauwermeiren and L. van Waes (Eds.). Perspectieven in taalbeheersingsonderzoek (pp. 130-143). Dordrecht: ICG
27. Sanders, T. & Spooren, W. (1996). Discourse intentions and coherence relations. Manuscript, submitted for publication
28. Sanders, T.J.M., Spooren, W.P.M. & Noordman, L.G.M. (1992). Towards a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 15, 1-35
29. - (1993). Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 93-133
30. Sanders, T.J.M. & Wijk, C. van (1996). PISA - A procedure for analyzing the structure of explanatory texts. Text, 16, 91-132
31. Smith, R.W. & Frawley, W.J. (1983). Conjunctive cohesion in four English genres. Text, 3, 347-374
32. Spooren, W.P.M.S. (1989). Some aspects of the form and interpretation of global contras- tive coherence relations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nijmegen University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
33. - (1997). The processing of underspecified coherence relations. Discourse Processes, this volume
34. Spooren, W., Sanders, T. & Visser, J. (1994). Taxonomie van coherentie-relaties: Evidentie uit taalverwervingsonderzoek? [Taxonomy of coherence relations: Evidence from language acquisition research?] Gramma/TTT, 3, 33-54
35. Sweetser, E.V. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
36. Verhagen, A. (1995). Meaning and the coordination of cognition. Plenary address at the conference of the International Cognitive Linguistics Association, Albuquerque, NM, July 16-21
37. Verschoof, P.L. (1994). Classificatie van coherentie-relaties: op zoek naar de feiten. [Classification of coherence relations: in search of the facts]. Unpublished master's thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
38. Vijfeyke, P. van de (1992). Ontbrekende schakels. Een onderzoek naar de samenhang tussen coherentie-relaties en teksttypen. [Missing links. An investigation of the relationship between coherence relations and text types.] Unpublished master's thesis, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
39. Virtanen, T. (1992). Issues of text typology: Narrative - a 'basic' type of text? Text, 12, 293-310.