Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: The example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies

BMJ Open

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2019, Pages

  Heus, Pauline ^a   Damen, Johanna A A G ^a   Pajouheshnia, Romin ^a   Scholten, Rob J P M ^a   Reitsma, Johannes B ^a   Collins, Gary S ^b   Altman, Douglas G ^b   Moons, Karel G M ^a   Hooft, Lotty ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

adherence; prediction model; reporting guideline; risk score; tripod

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDITOR; HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTION; SCIENTIST; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; METHODOLOGY; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; PUBLISHING; THEORETICAL MODEL;

DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 85065258314     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025611     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 2009;374:86-9.
2. Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet 2014;383:267-76.
3. Glasziou P, Meats E, Heneghan C, et al. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews BMJ 2008;336:1472-4.
4. Simera I, Altman DG, Moher D, et al. Guidelines for reporting health research: The EQUATOR network's survey of guideline authors. PLoS Med 2008;5:e139.
5. Simera I, Moher D, Hirst A, et al. Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: Reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med 2010;8:24.
6. Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, et al. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000217.
7. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996;276:637-9.
8. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallelgroup randomised trials. Lancet 2001;357:1191-4.
9. Schulz KF. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:726-32.
10. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 2015;351:h5527.
11. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:40-4.
12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.
13. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:573-7.
14. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, et al. REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Br J Cancer 2005;93:387-91.
15. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, et al. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement. Ann Intern Med 2015;162:55-63.
16. Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, et al. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: Has it improved Neurology 2006;67:792-7.
17. Korevaar DA, van Enst WA, Spijker R, et al. Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: A systematic review and metaanalysis of investigations on adherence to STARD. Evid Based Med 2014;19:47-54.
18. Korevaar DA, Wang J, van Enst WA, et al. Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Some improvements after 10 years of STARD. Radiology 2015;274:781-9.
19. Kane RL, Wang J, Garrard J. Reporting in randomised clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:241-9.
20. Hopewell S, Dutton S, Yu LM, et al. The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: Comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed. BMJ 2010;340:c723.
21. Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, et al. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:Mr000030.
22. Samaan Z, Mbuagbaw L, Kosa D, et al. A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature. J Multidiscip Healthc 2013;6:169-88.
23. Pussegoda K, Turner L, Garritty C, et al. Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality. Syst Rev 2017;6:131.
24. Heus P, Damen J, Pajouheshnia R, et al. Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: Towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement. BMC Med 2018;16:120.
25. Moons KG, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, et al. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2015;162:W1-73.