STARD 2015: An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies

The BMJ

Volumn 351, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Bossuyt, Patrick M ^a   Reitsma, Johannes B ^b   Bruns, David E ^c   Gatsonis, Constantine A ^d   Glasziou, Paul P ^e   Irwig, Les ^f   Lijmer, Jeroen G ^g   Moher, David ^h,i   Rennie, Drummond ^j,k   De Vet, Henrica C W ^l   Kressel, Herbert Y ^m,n   Rifai, Nader ^o,p   Golub, Robert M ^q,r   Altman, Douglas G ^s   Hooft, Lotty ^b   Korevaar, Daniël A ^a   Cohen, Jérémie F ^a,t  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^d BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e BOND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^g ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

^h OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^j Peer Review Congress   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^l VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^m HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

ⁿ Radiology Edit Office   (United States)

^o BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^p Clinical Chemistry Editorial Office   (United States)

^q NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^r JAMA   (United States)

^s UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^t PARIS DESCARTES UNIVERSITY   (France)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; CHECKLIST; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL BIAS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; DISCLOSURE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; REFERENCE STANDARDS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84948149440     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h5527     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet 2014;383:267-76.
2. Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P, Altman DG. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA 2010;303:2058-64.
3. Ochodo EA, de Haan MC, Reitsma JB, et al. Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of "spin." Radiology 2013;267:581-8.
4. Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2009;302:977-84.
5. Korevaar DA, Wang J, van Enst WA, et al. Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: some improvements after 10 years of STARD. Radiology 2015;274:781-9.
6. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282:1061-6.
7. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S. A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:1093-104.
8. Irwig L, Bossuyt P, Glasziou P, Gatsonis C, Lijmer J. Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable. BMJ 2002;324:669-71.
9. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative. Radiology 2003;226:24-8.
10. Korevaar DA, van Enst WA, Spijker R, Bossuyt PM, Hooft L. Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD. Evid Based Med 2014;19:47-54.
11. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, Group C. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:834-40.
12. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Linnet K, Moons KG. Beyond diagnostic accuracy: the clinical utility of diagnostic tests. Clin Chem 2012;58:1636-43.
13. Moons KG, de Groot JA, Linnet K, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM. Quantifying the added value of a diagnostic test or marker. Clin Chem 2012;58:1408-17.
14. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ 2015;350:g7594.
15. Simel DL, Rennie D, Bossuyt PM. The STARD statement for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: application to the history and physical examination. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:768-74.
16. Noel-Storr AH, McCleery JM, Richard E, et al. Reporting standards for studies of diagnostic test accuracy in dementia: the STARDdem Initiative. Neurology 2014;83:364-73.
17. Altman DG, Simera I, Hoey J, Moher D, Schulz K. EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research. Lancet 2008;371:1149-50.
18. Simera I, Moher D, Hirst A, et al. Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med 2010;8:24.
19. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186-91.
20. Collins FS, Tabak LA. Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility. Nature 2014;505:612-3.