The reign of truth and faith: Epistemic expressions in 16th and 17th century English

The Reign of Truth and Faith: Epistemic Expressions in 16th and 17th Century English

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-319

  Bromhead, Helen ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064995001     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (199)

1. Aijmer, Karin 1997. I think: An English modal particle. In Modality in the Germanic languages. Proceeding of the IXth international symposium on lan-guage, Swan, Toril and Jansen, OlafWestvik (eds.), 1-48. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
2. Aijmer, Karin 1998. Epistemic predicates in contrast. In Corpora and Cross-linguistic Research. Theory, method, and case studies, Stig Johansson and Signe Oksefjell (eds.), 271-298. Amsterdam: Rodopi
3. Allen, Cynthia 1995. Case Marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Oxford University Press
4. Ameka, Felix 1990. How discourse particles mean: The case of the Ewe 'terminal' particles. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 12 (2): 143-170
5. Apresjan, Juri 1974 Regularpolysemy. Linguistics 142: 5-32
6. Atkinson, Dwight 1999. Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
7. Bach, Kent and Robert Harnish 1982 Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
8. Bailey, Nathan 1969a Reprint. An Universal Etymological English Dictionary. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlay. Original edition, 1721
9. Bailey, Nathan 1969b Reprint. Dictionarium Britannicum. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag. Original edition, 1730
10. Barfield, Owen 1962 Reprint. History in English words. Faber and Faber: London. Original edition, 1926
11. Bauman, Richard and Charles L. Briggs 2003. Voices ofModernity: Language inequalities and thepolitics of Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
12. Benveniste, Emile 1971 Problems in General Linguistics. Trans. M.E. Meek. Coral Gables FL: University ofMiami Press
13. Berlin, Isaiah 1976 Vico and Herder: Two Studies in the history of ideas. London: Hogarth
14. Besemeres, Mary 2007 Between 'zal' and emotional blackmail: Ways of being in Polish and English. In Translating Lives: Living with two languages and cul-tures, Mary Besemeres and Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), 128-138. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press
15. Biber, Douglas 1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman
16. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana and Juliane House 1989. Cross-cultural and situational variation in requesting behavior. In Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and apologies, Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper (eds.), 123-154 Norwood, N.J.: Ablex
17. BNC. BritishNational Corpus. http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/
18. Boas, Franz 1911 Introduction. Handbook of American Indian Languages, v. 1. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 40: 5-83
19. Bosworth, Joseph 1955 Reprint. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. London: Oxford University Press. Originaledition, 1921
20. Brinton, Laurel 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
21. Bruce, F.F. 1979 History of the Bible in English. Guildford/London: Lutterworth Press
22. Burridge, Kate 2002. Changes within Pennsylvanian German grammar as enactments of a Anabaptist world view. In Ethnosyntax: Explorations in Grammar and Culture, N.J. Enfield (ed.), 207-230. Oxford: Oxford University Press
23. Bybee, Joan L. and William Pagliuca 1985. Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. In Historical Semantics: Historical word-formation, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 59-83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
24. Canfield, J. Douglas 1989 Word as Bond in English Literature from the Middle Ages to the Restoration. Philadelphia: University ofPennsylvania Press
25. CEEC 2006 Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Annotated by Ann Taylor, Arja Nurmi, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk, and Terttu Nevalainen. Compiled by the CEEC Project Team. York: University ofYork and Helsinki: University ofHelsinki
26. Chesterton, G.K. 1999. Reprint. Orthodoxy. London: Hodder & Stoughton. Original edition, 1908
27. Cinque, Guglielmo 1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press. Cobuild. Collins Cobuild Corpus, Glasgow: Harper Collins
28. Collins COBUILD English Language Dictionary 1991. London:HarperCollins
29. Comrie, Bernard 1984. Russian. In Interrogativity: A colloquium on the grammar, typology and pragmatics of questions in seven diverse languages, William S. Chisholm (ed.), 7-46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
30. Cruse, D.A. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
31. Crystal, David and Ben Crystal 2002. Shakespeare's Words: A glossary and language companion. London: Penguin
32. Davidson, Judy 1984 Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In Structures of Social action: Studies in conversational analysis, Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), 102-128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
33. de Smet, Hendrik and Jean-Christophe Verstraete 2006 Coming to terms with subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics 17 (3): 365-392
34. Downing, Angela 2001. 'Surely you know!' Surely as a marker of evidentiality and stance. Functions ofLanguage 8 (2): 253-285
35. Easthope, Antony 1999 Englishness andNational Culture. London: Routlege
36. Eckardt, Regine, Klaus von Heusinger and Christoph Schwarze 2003. Introduction: Historical linguistics as a transdisciplinary field of research. In Words In Time: Diachronic semantics from different points of view, Regine Eckardt, Klaus von Heusinger and Christoph Schwarze (eds.), 1-36. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
37. Enfield, N.J. 2002. Ethnosyntax: Introduction. In Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture, N.J. Enfield (ed.), 3-30. Oxford: Oxford University Press
38. Enfield, N.J. (ed.) 2002. Ethnosyntax: Explorations in Grammar and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press
39. Fernandez-Armesto, Felipe 1998 Truth: A History and guide for the perplexed. Fondon: Black Swan Books
40. Fitzmaurice, Susan M. 2002. The Familiar Letter in Early Modern English. Apragmatic approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
41. Fraser, Russell 1970 The WarAgainstPoetry. Princeton, N.J.: PrincetonUniversity Press
42. Geeraets, Dirk 1997. Diachronic Prototype Semantics: A contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press
43. Geeraets, Dirk 2005 Onomasiology and lexical variation. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. 2nd edition, Keith Brown (ed.), 9: 37-40. Oxford: Elsevier
44. Gladkova, Anna 2007. The journey of self-discovery in another language. In Translating Lives: Living with two languages and cultures, Mary Besemeres and Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), 139-149. St Fucia: University of Queen-sland Press
45. Goddard, Cliff 1994 Fexical primitives in Yankunytjatjara. In Semantic and Lexical Uni-versals, Cliff Goddard and Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), 229-262. Am-sterdam: John Benjamins
46. Goddard, Cliff 1996 Pitjantjatjara/Yankunytjatjara to English Dictionary. Revised 2nd edition. Alice Springs: Institute ofAboriginal Development Press
47. Goddard, Cliff 1998. Semantic analysis: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford. Uni-versity Press
48. Goddard, Cliff 2003. Thinking across languages and cultures: Six dimensions of variation. CognitiveLinguistics 14 (2/3): 109-140
49. Goddard, Cliff (ed.) 2008. Crosslinguistic Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
50. Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka 1994 Introducing lexical primitives. In Semantic and Lexical Universals, Cliff Goddard and Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), 31-54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
51. Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka 2002 Semantic primes and universal grammar. In Meaning and Universal grammar: Theory and empirical findings, volume 1, Cliff Goddard and Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), 41-85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
52. Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka 2008 New semantic primes and new syntactic frames: 'Specificaltional BE' and 'abstractTHlS/lT'. In Crosslinguistic Semantics, Cliff Goddard (ed.), 35-57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
53. Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka (eds.) 1994. Semantic and Lexical Universals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
54. Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka (eds.) 2002. Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and empirical findings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
55. Goldstein, Jan 1998. Enthusiasm of imagination? Eighteenth-century smear words in com-parative national context. In Enthusiasm and Enlightenment in Europe, 1650-1850, Lawrence E Klein and Anthony J. La Vopa (eds.), 29-50. San Marino: Huntington Library
56. Gonzalez-Alvarez, Maria Dolores 1996. Epistemic disjuncts in Early Modern English. International Journal ofCorpusLinguistics 1 (2): 219-256
57. Greenbaum, Sidney 1969 Studies in English Adverbial Usage. London: Longman
58. Günthner, Susanne 2003. Lexical-grammatical variation and development: The use of conjunctions as discourse markers in everyday spoken German. In Words in Time: Diachronic semantics from different points of view, Regine Eckardt, Klaus von Heusinger and Christoph Schwarze (eds.), 375-403. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
59. Hahn, Anna 2002 What does 'true' mean in Shakespeare's language? An exploration in historical semantics and in the history of values. B.A. Hons. Thesis. Canberra: Australian National University
60. Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold
61. Hanson, Kristin 1987. On subjectivity and the history of epistemic expressions in English. CLS: Papers from the 23rd Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 23: 132-147
62. Helsinki 1991 The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts, Early Modern English Section. Compiled under the direction of Merja Kytö. Helsinki: University ofHelsinki
63. Hill, Christopher 1964 Society and Puritanism in Pre-revolutionary England. London: Secker and Warburg
64. Hoffman, Eva 1989 LostIn Translation-A life in a new language. New York: Dutton
65. Hogg, Richard M. 1992-The Cambridge History of the English Language. 6 volumes. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press
66. Holmes, Janet 1982. Expressing doubt and certainty in English. RELC Journal. 13 (2): 9-28
67. Holmes, Janet 1990. Hedges and boosters in women's and men's speech. Language and Communication 10(3): 185-205
68. Hope, Jonathan 2004. Shakespeare and Language: An Introduction. In Shakespeare and Language, Catherine M.S. Alexander (ed.), 1-17. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press
69. Hope, Jonathan 2007 Probably, possibly, perhaps: A review of English: Meaning and culture by Anna Wierzbicka. Times Literary Supplement. 16 March, 2007
70. Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
71. Hoye, Leo 1997 Adverbs and Modality in English. London: Longman
72. Huebler, Axel 1983. Understatements and Hedges in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
73. Hughes, Geoffrey 1988. Words In Time: A social history of the English vocabulary. Oxford: Blackwell
74. Hughes, Geoffrey 1991. Swearing: A social history of foul language, oaths, and profanity in English. Oxford: Blackwell
75. Humboldt, Wilhelm von 1903-1936 Wilhelm von Humboldts Werke. 17 vols. Berlin: B. Behr
76. Ihalainen, Pasi 2006 Between historical semantics and pragmatics: Reconstructing past political thought through conceptual history. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 7 (1): 115-143
77. Jackendoff, Ray 1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
78. Jackendoff, Ray 2006. On Conceptual Semantics. InterculturalPragmatics 3 (3): 353-358
79. Jackendoff, Ray 2007. Conceptual semantics and natural semantic metalanguage theory have different goals. Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (3): 411-418
80. Jackson, Gabriele Bernhard 1991 From essence to accident: Locke and the language of poetry. In John Locke: Critical assessments, Richard Ashcraft (ed.), 242-277. Lon-don: Routledge
81. Johnson, Samuel 1812 Reprint. A dictionary of the English language: In which words are deduced from their originals, and illustrated in their different signification by examples from the best writers. London: G. & J. Offer and Others. Original edition, 1755
82. Johnson, Samuel 1963 Johnson's Dictionary: A Modern Selection, E.L. McAcdam, Jr. and George Milne (eds.). New York: Pantheon Books
83. Jucker, Andreas H. 1986 News Interviews: A pragmalinguistic analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
84. Jucker, Andreas H. 2002. Discourse markers in Early Modern English. In Alternative Histories of English, Richard Watts and Peter Trudgill (eds.), 210-230. London and New York: Routledge
85. Jucker, Andreas H. (ed.) 1995. Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, Amsterdam: John Benjamins
86. Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen 2000. Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming. Jour-nal ofHistoricalPragmatics 1 (1): 67-95
87. Kachru, Braj 1985. Standard, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English lan-guage in the outer circle. In English in the World: Teaching and learning the language and literatures, R. Quirk and H.G Widdowson (eds.), 11-30. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress
88. Karkkainen, Elise 2003. Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
89. Klein, Lawrence E. and Anthony J. La Vopa 1998 Enthusiasm and Enlightenment in Europe, 1650-1850. San Marino: Huntington Library
90. Kurath, Hans, Sherman M. Kuhn and John Reidy (eds.) 1956-Middle English Dictionary. Ann Arbor Michigan: University of Michigan Press
91. Langacker, Ronald 1985 Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In Iconicity in Syntax, John Haiman (ed.), 109-150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
92. Langacker, Ronald 1995 Raising and transparency. Language 71: 1-62
93. Lawton, David 1990 Faith, Text and History: The Bible in English. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf
94. Lenker, Ursula 2003 Forsooth, a Source: Metalinguistic Thought in Early English. In Bookmarksfrom the Past. Studies in Early English language and literature in honour of Helmut Gneuss. Lucia Kornexl and Ursula Lenker (eds.), 261-288. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang
95. Lenker, Ursula 2007 Solice, forsoothe, truly: Communicative principles and invited Inferences in the history of truth-intensifying adverbs in English. In Methods in Historical Pragmatics. Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), 81-105. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
96. Levinson, Stephen 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
97. LION Literature Online. ProQuest Information and Learning Company. http://lion.chadwyck.com/
98. Locke, John 1975 Reprint. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Oxford University Press. Original edition, 1690
99. Logan, Sarah 1998 New meanings and ways of talking about anger, wrath, proud, and shame: A comparison of the works of William Shakespeare and the internet. B.A. Hons. Thesis. Canberra: Australian National University
100. Longman 1984. Longman Dictionary of the English Language. Harlow, Essex: Longman
101. López-Couso, Maria José 1996. On the history of METHINKS: From impersonal construction to fossilisedexpression. FoliaLinguisticaHistorica 17 (1-2): 153-169
102. Lutz, Catherine 1990 Engendered emotion: Gender, power, and the rhetoric of emotional control in American discourse. In Language and the Politics of Emotion, Catherine Lutz and L. Abu-Loghod (eds.), 69-91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
103. Lyons, John 1977 Semantics. 2 volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
104. Mathiot, Madeleine 1979 Ethnolinguistics: Boas, Sapir and Whorfrevisited. The Hague: Mouton
105. Matoré, Georges. 1953. La Méthode en Lexicologie: Domaine Frangais. Paris: Didier
106. Mel'cuk, Igor 1989. Semantic primitives from the viewpoint of the Meaning Test Linguistic Theory. Quaderni di Semantica 10 (1): 65-102
107. More, Thomas 1977 Reprint. A Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation. London: Heron Books. Originaledition, 1557
108. Myhill, John 1995. Change and continuity in the functions of the American English mo-dals. Linguistics 33: 157-211
109. Myhill, John 1996. The Development of the Strong Obligation System in American English. American Speech 71 (4): 339-388
110. Myhill, John 1997. Should and ought: The rise of individually oriented modality in American English. English Language andLinguistics 1: 3-23
111. Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg 2003 Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Longman
112. Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (eds.) 1996 Sociolinguistics and Language history: Studies based on the Corpus ofEarly English Correspondence. Amsterdam: Rodopi
113. Nida, Eugene and Charles Taber 1969 The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: E.J. Brill for the United Bible Societies
114. OED 1964 Reprint. The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Prin-ciples. C.T. Onions (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Original edition, 1933
115. OED 1966 The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. C.T. Onions (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press.http://dictionary.oed.com/
116. Palander-Collin, Minna 1996. The rise and fall of METHINKS. In Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence, Terttu Nevalainen and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (eds.), 132-149. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi
117. Palander-Collin, Minna 1997. A medieval case of grammaticalization, methinks. In Grammaticali-zation at Work: Studies of long-term developments in English, Merja Kytö and K K. Heikkonen (eds.), 371-403. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
118. Palander-Collin, Minna 1998. Grammaticalization of I THINK and METHINKS in Late Middle and Early Modern English: A sociolinguistic perspective. Neuphilo-gischeMitteilungen. 99: 419-442
119. Palander-Collin, Minna 1999a I think, Methinks: Register variation, stratification, education, and nonstandard language. In Writing in Non-Standard English, Irma Taavitsainen; Gunnel Melchers and Paivi Pahta (eds.), 243-262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
120. Palander-Collin, Minna 1999b Male and female styles in 17th century correspondence: I think. Lan-guage Variation and Change 11: 123-141
121. Palmer, F.R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
122. Palmer, F.R. 1990 Modality and the English Modals. 2nd edition. New York: Longman. Original edition, 1979
123. Peeters, Bert (ed.) 2006 Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar: Empirical evidence from the Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
124. Pomerantz, Anita 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in conversational analysis. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), 57-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
125. Porter, Roy 2000 Enlightenment: Britain and the creation of the modern world. London: Penguin
126. Priest, Stephen 1990 TheBritishEmpriricists. Hammondsworth: Penguin
127. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman
128. Reddick, Allen 1990. The Making of Johnson's Dictionary 1746-1773. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
129. Rissanen, Matti, Merja Kytö and Minna Palander-Collin (eds.) 1993. Early English in the Computer Age. Explorations through the Helsinki Corpus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
130. Romaine, Suzanne 1982 Socio-historical Linguistics: Its status and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
131. Romaine, Suzanne and D. Lang 1991. The use of 'like' as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech 66: 227-258
132. Sadock, Jerrold. 1970 Whimperatives. In Studies presented to R.B Lees by his Students, Jerrold Sadock and Anthony Vanek (eds.), 223-238. Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc
133. Salmon, Vivian 1987. Elizabethan colloquial English in the Falstaff plays, In A Reader in the Language of Shakespearean Drama. Vivian Salmon and Edwina Burness (eds.), 37-70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
134. Sapir, Edward 1951 Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture and Per-sonality. Berkeley: University of California Press
135. Sapir, Edward 1994. The Psychology of Culture: A course of lectures. Judith T. Irvine (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
136. Sasek, Lawrence A. 1969 The Literary Temper of the English Puritans. New York: Greenwood Press
137. Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Issues of relevance in discourse analysis: Contingency in action, interaction and co-participant context. In Burning Issues in Dis-course, Eduard H. Hovey and Donia R. Scott (eds.), 3-35. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
138. Scheibman, Joanne 2000. I dunno: A usage-based account of the phonological reduction of don't in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 105-124
139. Scheibman, Joanne2001. Local patterns of subjectivity in person and verb type in American English conversation. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper (eds.), 61-89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
140. Schiffrin, Deborah 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
141. Schmidt, Alexander 1923 Shakespeare-lexicon: A complete dictionary ofall the English words, phrases and constructions in the works of the poet. 2 volumes. 4th edition, revised by Gregor Sarrazin. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
142. Schourup, Lawrence 1999. Shakespeare's 'well'. JoshidaiBungaku. 51: 83-115
143. Schwenter, Scott A. 2000. Viewpoints and polysemy: Linking adversative and causal meanings of discourse markers. In Cause-Condition-Contrast-Concession, Bernd Kortmann and Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), 257-281. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
144. Searle, John 1975 Indirect speech acts. In Syntax and Semantics: Speech acts, volume 3, Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), 59-82. New York: Academic Press
145. Shakespeare, William 1985 Shakespeare made easy Romeo and Juliet. Edited and rendered into modern English by Alan Durband. Hauppauge N.Y.: Barron's Edu-cational Series Inc
146. Shakespeare, William 1997. The Riverside Shakespeare. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company
147. Shakespeare, William 2005 Much Ado About Nothing. Translated into Modem English by Warren King, www.nosweatshakespeare.com
148. Shapin, Steven 1994 A Social History of Truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
149. Shipley, Joseph 1957. Dictionary ofEarly English. London: Peter Owen
150. Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie 1998. I think and its Dutch equivalents in parlimentary debates. In Corpora and Cross-linguistic Research: Theory, method and case studies, J. Stig and S. Oksefjell (eds.), 297-317. Rodopi: Atlanta
151. Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie 2000. The functions of I think in political discourse. International Journal ofAppliedLinguistics. 10 (1): 41-63
152. Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie 2002. I think-A marker of middle class discourse? In Studia Linguistica et Litteraria Septentrionalia, E. Karkkainen, J. Haines and T. Lautta-mus (eds.), 93-106. Oulu: University of Oulu
153. Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie and Karin Aijmer 2007 The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
154. Skeat. W.W. 1968 Reprint. A Glossary of Tudor and Stuart Words, A.L. Mayhew (ed.). Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlay. Original edition 1914
155. Smith, Nicholas 2003. Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English. In Modality in Contem-porary English. Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred G. Krug and F.R. Palmer (eds.), 241-266. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
156. Sönmez, Margaret J.-M. 2001. Oaths, exclamations and selected discourse markers in three genres. European Journal of English Studies, Special Issue: Early Modern English Text Types 5 (2): 151-165
157. Spevack, Marvin 1968 A Complete and Systematic Concordance to the Works of Shakespeare. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlay
158. Starnes, De Witt T. and Gertrude E. Noyes 1946 The English Dictionary from Cawdrey to Johnson 1604-1755. Chapel Hill: University ofNorth Carolina Press
159. Steinberg, Jacques 2005. 2005: In a word. The New York Times 25 December: 4.3
160. Steiner, George 1971 The Language Animal. In Extraterritorial: Papers on literature and the language revolution, 58-101. Atheneum: New York
161. 'Studylight' Studylight online Bible concordance, http://www.studylight.org/
162. Swan, Toril 1988. Sentence Adverbials in English: A synchronic and diachronic investigation. Oslo: Novus Forlag
163. Swan, Toril 1991 Adverbial shifts: Evidence from Norwegian and English. In Historical English Syntax, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 408-438. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
164. Taavitsainen, Irma 1994. Subjectivity as a text-type marker in historical stylistics. Language andLiterature 3 (3): 197-212
165. Taavitsainen, Irma 2001. Changing conventions of writing: The dynamics of genres, text types, and text traditions. European Journal of English Studies. Special Issue: Early Modern English Text Types. 5 (2): 139-150
166. Taavitsainen, Irma 2002. Historical discourse analysis. Scientific language and changing thought styles. In Sounds, Words, Texts and Change, Teresa Fanego, Belén Méndez-Naya and Elena Seoane (eds.), 201-226. Amsterdam: John Benjamin
167. Thompson, Elbert N. S. 1966 Reprint. The Controversy between Puritans and the Stage. New York: Russell and Russell. Original edition, 1903
168. Thompson, Sandra A. and Anthony Mulac 1991 A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parenthetical in English. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), 313-331. Amster-dam: John Benjamins
169. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjec-tification in language change. Language 57: 33-65
170. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1995. Subjectification in Grammaticalization. In Subjectivity and Subjec-tivisation in Language. Dieter Stein and Susan Wrights (eds.), 31-54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
171. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2005 Historical aspects of modality. In The Expression of Modality. William Frawley (ed.), 107-139. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
172. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Richard B. Dasher 2005 Reprint. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Original edition, 2002
173. Travis, Catherine 2005 Discourse Markers in Colombian Spanish: A study in polysemy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
174. Tucker, Susie 1962 'Forsooth, Madam'.N&Q9: 15-16
175. Van Bogaert, Julie 2006 I guess, I suppose and I believe as pragmatic markers: Grammaticali-zation and functions. BELL New Series 4: 129-149
176. Verhagen, Arie 1995. Subjectification, syntax and communication. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds.), 103-128. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtiy Press
177. Véliz, Claudio 1994 The New World of the Gothic Fox: Culture and economy in English and Spanish America. Berkeley: University of California Press
178. Vico, Giambattista 1968 The New Science of Giambattista Vico. Trans. Thomas Bergin and Max Fisch. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press
179. Visconti, Jacqueline 2004. Conditionals and subjecitfication: Implications for a theory of semantic change. In Up and Down the Cline-The nature of grammaticali-zation, Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde and Harry Perridon (eds.), 167-192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
180. Watson, Curtis Brown 1960 Shakespeare and the Renaissance Concept of Honor. Princeton: Princeton University Press
181. Weil, Judith 2005 Service and Dependency in Shakespeare's Plays. New York: Cambridge University Press
182. Whorf, Benjamin Lee 1978. Reprint. Language, Thought and Reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Original edition, 1956
183. Wierzbicka, Anna 1979. Ethno-syntax and the Philosophy of Grammar. Studies in Language 3 (3): 313-383
184. Wierzbicka, Anna 1985 Lexicography and Conceptual Analysis. Ann Arbor: Karoma
185. Wierzbicka, Anna 1987 English Speech Act Verbs: A semantic dictionary. Sydney: Academic Press
186. Wierzbicka, Anna 1996. Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press
187. Wierzbicka, Anna 1997. Understanding Cultures Through their Key Works: English, Russian, Polish, German and Japanese. New York: Oxford University Press
188. Wierzbicka, Anna 1999. Emotions Across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
189. Wierzbicka, Anna 2002a Philosophy and discourse: The rise of 'really' and the fall of 'truly'. Cahiers depraxsémantique 38: 85-112
190. Wierzbicka, Anna 2002b Polish. In Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and empirical findings, Cliff Goddard and Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), 65-136. Am-sterdam: John Benjamins
191. Wierzbicka, Anna 2003. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. 2nd edition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
192. Wierzbicka, Anna 2004. Pragmatic particles and cognition. Paper presented at the Symposium on 'Universals and Typology' at the Sorbonne University, Paris, February 2004
193. Wierzbicka, Anna 2006a. English: Meaning and culture. New York: Oxford University Press
194. Wierzbicka, Anna 2006b Anglo scripts against 'putting pressure' on other people and their linguistic manifestations. In Ethnopragmatics: Understanding discourse in cultural context, Cliff Goddard (ed.), 31-63. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
195. Wierzbicka, Anna 2006c The concept of dialogue in cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspective. Discourse Studies 8 (5): 675-703. In press Evidence, Experience and Sense: The hidden cultural legacy of English. New York: Oxford University Press
196. Wilkins, David 1993 Linguistic evidence in support of a holistic approach to traditional ecological knowledge. In Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Wisdom for sustainable development, G.N. Williams and G. Baines (eds.), 71-93. Canberra: CRES Publications
197. Williams, Raymond 1985 Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. London: Fontana. Original edition, 1976
198. Wong Jock 2004a. Cultural scripts, ways of speaking and perceptions of personal auton omy: Anglo English vs. Singapore English. Intercultural Pragmatics 1 (2): 231-248
199. Wong Jock 2004b The particles of Singapore English: A semantic and cultural interpretation. Journal ofPragmatics 36 (4): 739-793