An empirical analysis of responsibilities and technological complexity in dutch immigration policies

Public Management Review

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 771-790

  Meijer, A J ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Complexity; Immigration policies; Responsibility; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949503205     PISSN: 14719037     EISSN: 14719045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14719030903318947     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arendt, H. (1965) Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, New York: Viking.
2. Bovens, M. (1997) The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bovens, M. and Zouridis, S. (2002) From Street-Level to System-Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology Is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control, Public Administration Review. 62: 2 pp174-84.
4. Broeders, D. (2009) 'Mobiliteit en surveillance: Een migratiemachine in de maak' in H. Dijstelbloem and A. Meijer (eds) De migratiemachine: De rol van technologie in het migratiebeleid, Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
5. Brouwer, E. (2008) Digital Borders and Real Rights: Effective Remedies for Third-Country Nationals in the Schengen Information System, Leiden & Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
6. ---- (2009) 'Juridische grenzen aan de inzet van migratietechnologie' in H. Dijstelbloem and A. Meijer (eds) De migratiemachine: De rol van technologie in het migratiebeleid, Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
7. Burke, J. P. (1997) Reconciling Public Administration and Democracy: The Role of the Responsible Administrator, International Journal of Public Administration. 20: 4 pp1017-36.
8. Cooper, T. L. (1990) The Responsible Administrator: An Approach to Ethics for the Administrative Role, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9. ---- (2004) Big Questions in Administrative Ethics: A Need for Focused, Collaborative Effort, Public Administration Review. 64: 4 pp395-407.
10. Dijstelbloem, H. and Meijer, A. eds (2009) De migratiemachine: De rol van technologie in het migratiebeleid, Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
11. Finer, H. (1941) Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government, Public Administration Review. 1: 3 pp335-50.
12. Friedrich, C. J. (1940) Public Policy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Geuijen, C. (2004) De asielcontroverse: Argumenteren over mensenrechten en nationale belangen, Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.
14. Goodin, R. (1985) Protecting the Vulnerable, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15. Hardin, R. (1996) 'Institutional Morality' in R. E. Goodin (ed.)The Theory of Institutional Design, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Hood, C. and Margetts, H. Z. (2007) The Tools of Government in the Digital Age, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
17. Inda, J. X. (2006) Targeting Immigrants: Government, Technology and Ethics, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
18. Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E. H. and Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1997) Managing Complex Networks, London: Sage.
19. Kjaer, A. M. (2004) Governance, Cambridge: Polity Press.
20. Koppell, J. G. S. (2005) Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of 'Multiple Accountabilities Disorder', Public Administration Review. 65: 1 pp94-108.
21. Kroon, N. (1997) Europese informatiesystemen: Grensverleggen? Een verkenning naar barrières in de bouwfase van het Schengen Informatie Systeem en het Social Security Network, Delft: Eburon.
22. Levitan, D. M. (1946) The Responsibility of Administrative Officials in a Democratic Society, Political Science Quarterly. 61: 4 pp562-98.
23. Levitt, S. and Dubner, S. J. (2005) Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything, New York: William Morrow/HarperCollins.
24. Meijer, A. (2009) 'Informatietechnologie en verantwoordelijkheid: Een onbeheersbare machine' in H. Dijstelbloem and A. Meijer (eds) De migratiemachine: De rol van technologie in het migratiebeleid, Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
25. Michels, A. and Meijer, A. (2008) Safeguarding Public Accountability in Horizontal Government, Public Management Review. 10: 2 pp165-73.
26. National Ombudsman (2003) Report number 2003/160.
27. Netherlands Court of Audit (2004) Immigratie- en Naturalisatiedienst, Second Chamber, 2004/2005, 20240, Nrs 1 and 2.
28. Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy (WRR) (2000) Het borgen van publiek belang [Safeguarding the Public Interest], WRR: The Hague.
29. Pitkin, H. F. (1967) The Concept of Representation, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30. Romzek, B. and Dubnick, M. (1987) Accountability in the Public Sector: Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy, Public Administration Review. 47: 3 pp227-38.
31. Smits, H. (2007) 'Politie bezorgd over Schengen [Police Concerns about Schengen].' Financieel Dagblad: Economie & Politiek, 20 December, p4.
32. Strom, K. (2000) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, European Journal of Political Research. 37: 3 pp261-89.
33. Teeuw, W., Vedder, A., Dorbeck-Jung, B., Custers, B., Faber, E. and Leenes, R. (2007) Impact of Converging Technologies on Future Security Applications, Enschede: Telematica Instituut.
34. Thompson, D. F. (1980) Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands, American Political Science Review. 74: 4 pp905-16.
35. Van den Hoven, M. (1998) 'Moral Responsibility, Public Office and Information Technology' in I. Snellen and W. van den Donk (eds) Public Administration in an Information Age, Amsterdam: IOS Press.
36. Van der Ploeg, I. and Sprenkels, I. (2009) 'Migratie en het machine-leesbare lichaam: Identificatie en biometrie' in H. Dijstelbloem and A. Meijer (eds) De migratiemachine: De rol van technologie in het migratiebeleid, Amsterdam: Van Gennep.