The dynamical approach to speech perception: From fine phonetic detail to abstract phonological categories

Approaches to Phonological Complexity

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 193-218

  Nguyen, Noël ^a   Wauquier, Sophie ^b   Tuller, Betty ^c  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 8   (France)

^c FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064630552     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (76)

1. Allen, J. and Miller, J. 2004 Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onsettime. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115:3171-3183
2. Andruski, J., Blumstein, S., and Burton, M. 1994 The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access. Cognition, 52:163-187
3. Barlow, M. and Kemmer, S. (eds) 2000 Usage-Based Models of Language. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA
4. Bybee, J. 2001 Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Bybee, J. 2006a Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford
6. Bybee, J. 2006b From usage to grammar: the mind's response to repetition. Language, 82:529-551
7. Bybee, J. and McClelland, J. 2005 Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition. The Linguistic Review, 22:381-410
8. Case, P., Tuller, B., Ding, M., and Kelso, J. 1995 Evaluation of a dynamical model of speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 57:977-988
9. Case, P., Tuller, B., and Kelso, J. 2003 The dynamics of learning to hear new speech sounds. Speech Pathology. November 17, 1-8 from http://www.speechpathology.com/articles/arc_disp.asp?article_id=50 &catid=560
10. Cohn, A. 2005 Gradience and categoriality in sound patterns. Paper presented at the Workshop on Phonological Systems and Complex Adaptive Systems, Lyons, France, 4-6 July 2005
11. Coleman, J. 2002 Phonetic representations in the mental lexicon. In Durand, J. and Laks, B., editors, Phonetics, Phonology, and Cognition, pp. 96-130. Oxford University Press, Oxford
12. Couper-Kuhlen, E. and Ford, C. (eds) 2004 Sound Patterns in Interaction. Cross-linguistic Studies from Conversation. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
13. Cutler, A., Eisner, F., McQueen, J., and Norris, D. to appear Coping with speaker-related variation via abstract phonemic categories. In Fougeron, C., D'Imperio, M., Kühnert, B., and Vallée, N., editors, Papers in Laboratory Phonology X. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin
14. de Boer, Bart 2000 Self-organization in vowel systems. Journal of Phonetics, 28:441-465
15. Dufour, S., Nguyen, N., and Frauenfelder, U. 2007 The perception of phonemic contrasts in a non-native dialect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Express Letters. 121:EL131-EL136
16. Durand, J. 1990 Generative and Non-Linear Phonology. Longman, London
17. Elman, J. 1990 Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14:179-211
18. Elman, J. and McClelland, J. 1988 Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 27:143-165
19. Encrevé, P. 1988 La liaison avec et sans enchaînement. Seuil, Paris
20. Erlhagen, W., Mukovskiy, A., and Bicho, E. 2006 A dynamic model for action understanding and goal-directed imitation. Brain Research, 1083:174-188
21. Eulitz, C. and Lahiri, A. 2004 Neurobiological evidence for abstract phonological representations in the mental lexicon during speech recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16:577-583
22. Fitzpatrick, J. and Wheeldon, L. 2000 Phonology and phonetics in psycholinguistics models of speech perception. In Burton-Roberts, N., Carr, P., and Docherty, G., editors, Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues, pages 131-160. Oxford University Press, Oxford
23. Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. 2006 The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 34:409-438
24. Gaskell, M. 2003 Modelling regressive and progressive effects of assimilation in speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 31:447-463
25. Giles, H., Coupland, N., and Coupland, J. 1991 Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Giles, H., Coupland, N., and Coupland, J., editors, Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics, pp. 1-68. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
26. Goldinger, S. 1996 Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22:1166-1183
27. Goldinger, S. 1998 Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105:251-279
28. Goldstein, L. 2003 Emergence of discrete gestures. In Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 85-88, Barcelona, Spain
29. Grossberg, S. 2003 Resonant neural dynamics of speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 31:423-445
30. Hawkins, S. 2003 Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics, 31:373-405
31. Hawkins, S. to appear Phonetic variation as communicative system: Perception of the particular and the abstract. In Fougeron, C., D'Imperio, M., Kühnert, B., and Vallée, N., editors, Papers in Laboratory Phonology X. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. to appear
32. Hawkins, S. and Smith, R. 2001 Polysp: A polysystemic, phonetically-rich approach to speech understanding. Rivista di Linguistica, 13:99-188
33. Hintzman, D. 1986 'Schema abstraction' in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93:411-428
34. Jarick, M. and Jones, J.A. 2008 Observation of static gestures influences speech production. Experimental Brain Research, 189:221-228
35. Johnson, K. 1997a The auditory/perceptual basis for speech segmentation. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 50:101-113
36. Johnson, K. 1997b Speech perception without speaker normalization. In Johnson, K. and Mullenix, J., editors, Talker Variability in Speech Processing, pp. 145-166. Academic Press, San Diego
37. Johnson, K. 2005a Decisions and mechanisms in exemplar-based phonology. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report, pp. 289-311
38. Johnson, K. 2005b Speaker normalization in speech perception. In Pisoni, D. and Remez, R., editors, The Handbook of Speech Perception. Blackwell, Malden, MA. pp. 363-389
39. Klatt, D. 1979 Speech perception: a model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 7:279-312
40. Lahiri, A. and Marslen-Wilson, W. 1991 The mental representation of lexical form: a phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition, 38:245-294
41. Lahiri, A. and Reetz, H. 2002 Underspecified recognition. In Gussenhoven, C. and Warner, N., editors, Papers in Laboratory Phonology VII, pp. 637-675. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin
42. Lavoie, L. 1996 Lexical frequency effects on the duration of schwa-Resonant sequences in American English. Poster presented at LabPhon 5, Chicago, June 1996
43. Luce, P. and McLennan, C. 2005 Spoken word recognition: The challenge of variation. In Pisoni, D. and Remez, R., editors, The Handbook of Speech Perception, pages 591-609. Blackwell, Malden, MA
44. Marslen-Wilson, W. and Warren, P. 1994 Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access-words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review, 101:653-675
45. Martin, J. and Bunnell, H. 1981 Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69:559-567
46. Martin, J. and Bunnell, H. 1982 Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects in vowel-stop consonant-vowel sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8:473-488
47. McClelland, J. and Elman, J. 1986 The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18:1-86
48. McLennan, C. and Luce, P. 2005 Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31:306-321
49. McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M., and Aslin, R. 2002 Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition, 86:B33-B42
50. McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M., Aslin, R., and Spivey, M. 2003 Probabilistic constraint satisfaction at the lexical/phonetic interface: Evidence for gradient effects of within-category VOT on lexical access. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32:77-97
51. Meltzoff, A. and Moore, M. 1997 Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6:179-192
52. Mitterer, H. 2006 Is vowel normalization independent of lexical processing? Phonetica, 63:209-229
53. Nguyen, N., Lancia, L., Bergounioux, M., Wauquier-Gravelines, S., and Tuller, B. 2005 Role of training and short-term context effects in the identification of /s/ and /st/ in French. In Hazan, V. and Iverson, P., editors, ISCA Workshop on Plasticity in Speech Perception (PSP2005), pages A38-39, London
54. Nguyen, N., Lancia, L., and Tuller, B. 2007a The dynamics of speech categorization: Evidence from French. in preparation
55. Nguyen, N., Wauquier-Gravelines, S., Lancia, L., and Tuller, B. 2007b Detection of liaison consonants in speech processing in French: Experimental data and theoretical implications. In Prieto, P., Mascaro, J. and Solé, M.-J., editors, Segmental and Prosodic Issues in Romance Phonology, pp. 3-23. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
56. Pallier, C. 2000 Word recognition: do we need phonological representations? In Cutler, A., McQueen, J., and Zondervan, R., editors, Proceedings of the Workshop on Spoken Word Access Processes (SWAP), pp. 159-162, Nijmegen
57. Pallier, C., Colomé, A., and Sebastián-Gallès, N. 2001 The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: exemplar-based vs. abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science, 12:445-449
58. Pardo, J. 2006 On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119:2382-2393
59. Pardo, J. S. and Remez, R. E. 2007 The perception of speech. In Traxler, M. and Gernsbacher, M., editors, The Handbook of Psycholinguistics, Second Edition. Elsevier, Cambridge, MA. in press
60. Pierrehumbert, J. 2001 Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In Bybee, J. and Hopper, P., editors, Frequency Effects and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, pages 137-157. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
61. Pierrehumbert, J. 2002 Word-specific phonetics. In Gussenhoven, C. and Warner, N., editors, Papers in Laboratory Phonology VII, pages 101-140. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin
62. Pierrehumbert, J. 2006 The next toolkit. Journal of Phonetics, 34:516-530
63. Pitt, M. and Johnson, K. 2003 Using pronunciation data as a starting point in modeling word recognition. In Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain
64. Stevens, K. 2002 Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111:1872-1891
65. Stevens, K. 2004 Invariance and variability in speech: Interpreting acoustic evidence. In Slifka, J., Manuel, S., and Matthies, M., editors, Proceedings of From Sound to Sense: 50+ Years of Discovery in Speech Communication, pages B77-B85, Cambridge, MA. MIT. URL: www.rle.mit.edu/soundtosense/
66. Strand, E. 2000 Gender Stereotype Effects in Speech Processing. PhD thesis, Ohio State University
67. Studdert-Kennedy, M. 2002 Mirror neurons, vocal imitation and the evolution of particulate speech. In Stamenov, M. and Gallese, V., editors, Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language, pages 207-227. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
68. Tuller, B. 2003 Computational models in speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 31:503-507
69. 2004 Categorization and learning in speech perception as dynamical processes. In Riley, M. and Van Orden, G., editors, Tutorials in Contemporary Nonlinear Methods for the Behavioral Sciences. National Science Foundation. URL: www.nsf.gov/sbe/bcs/pac/nmbs/nmbs.jsp
70. Tuller, B., Case, P., Ding, M., and Kelso, J. 1994 The nonlinear dynamics of speech categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20:3-16
71. Tuller, B., Jantzen, M., and Jirsa, V. 2008 A dynamical approach to speech categorization: Two routes to learning. New Ideas in Psychology, 26:208-226
72. Tuller, B. and Kelso, J. 1990 Phase transitions in speech production and their perceptual consequences. In Jeannerod, M., editor, Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control, pages 429-452. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
73. Tuller, B. and Kelso, J. 1991 The production and perception of syllable structure. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34:501-508
74. Vihman, M. 2002 The role of mirror neurons in the ontogeny of speech. In Stamenov, M. and Gallese, V., editors, Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language, pp. 305-314. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
75. Wauquier-Gravelines, S. 1996 Organisation phonologique et traitement de la parole continue. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Université Paris 7, Paris
76. West, P. 1999 Perception of distributed coarticulatory properties in English /I/ and /I/. Journal of Phonetics, 27:405-426