메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2019, Pages

Checklist for the preparation and review of pain clinical trial publications: A pain-specific supplement to CONSORT

Author keywords

Reporting checklist

Indexed keywords


EID: 85064425914     PISSN: None     EISSN: 24712531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000621     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (33)

References (44)
  • 1
    • 84971580244 scopus 로고
    • Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
    • Altman D, Bland M. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ 1995; 311: 485.
    • (1995) BMJ , vol.311 , pp. 485
    • Altman, D.1    Bland, M.2
  • 2
    • 0024268463 scopus 로고
    • Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee
    • Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1833-40.
    • (1988) J Rheumatol , vol.15 , pp. 1833-1840
    • Bellamy, N.1    Buchanan, W.W.2    Goldsmith, C.H.3    Campbell, J.4    Stitt, L.W.5
  • 3
    • 79952842488 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials
    • Borrelli B. The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. J Public Health Dent 2011; 71: S52-63.
    • (2011) J Public Health Dent , vol.71 , pp. S52-63
    • Borrelli, B.1
  • 4
    • 77952787734 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes
    • Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P, Altman DG. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA 2010; 303: 2058-64.
    • (2010) JAMA , vol.303 , pp. 2058-2064
    • Boutron, I.1    Dutton, S.2    Ravaud, P.3    Altman, D.G.4
  • 5
    • 0026165648 scopus 로고
    • The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire: Development and validation
    • Buckhardt CS, Clark SR, Bennet RM. The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire: development and validation. J Rheumatol 1991; 18: 728-33.
    • (1991) J Rheumatol , vol.18 , pp. 728-733
    • Buckhardt, C.S.1    Clark, S.R.2    Bennet, R.M.3
  • 6
    • 78650809219 scopus 로고
    • CleelandC. Accessed February 15, 2017
    • CleelandC. Brief pain inventory, 1991. Available at: http://www. mdanderson. org/education-and-research/departments-programs-and-labs/departmentsand-divisions/symptom-research/symptom-assessment-tools/brief-paininventory. html. Accessed February 15, 2017.
    • (1991) Brief Pain Inventory
  • 7
    • 0021807406 scopus 로고
    • When was a "negative" clinical trial big enough? How many patients you needed depends on what you found
    • Detsky AS, Sackett DL. When was a "negative" clinical trial big enough? How many patients you needed depends on what you found. Arch Intern Med 1985; 145: 709-12.
    • (1985) Arch Intern Med , vol.145 , pp. 709-712
    • Detsky, A.S.1    Sackett, D.L.2
  • 9
    • 84932197179 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reliability is necessary but far from sufficient. Howmight the validity of pain ratings be improved?
    • Dworkin RH, Burke LB, Gewandter JS, Smith SM. Reliability is necessary but far from sufficient. Howmight the validity of pain ratings be improved? CJP 2015; 31: 599-602.
    • (2015) CJP , vol.31 , pp. 599-602
    • Dworkin, R.H.1    Burke, L.B.2    Gewandter, J.S.3    Smith, S.M.4
  • 12
    • 33646759912 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guideline on choice of non-inferiority margin
    • European Medicines Agency
    • European Medicines Agency. Guideline on choice of non-inferiority margin. Stat Med 2006; 25: 1628-38.
    • (2006) Stat Med , vol.25 , pp. 1628-1638
  • 13
    • 33646245937 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Adaptive designs in clinical drug development-an Executive Summary of the PhRMA Working Group
    • discussion 285-91, 293-8, 311-2
    • Gallo P, Chuang-Stein C, Dragalin V, Gaydos B, Krams M, Pinheiro J. Adaptive designs in clinical drug development-an Executive Summary of the PhRMA Working Group. J Biopharm Stat 2006; 16: 275-83; discussion 285-91, 293-8, 311-2.
    • (2006) J Biopharm Stat , vol.16 , pp. 275-283
    • Gallo, P.1    Chuang-Stein, C.2    Dragalin, V.3    Gaydos, B.4    Krams, M.5    Pinheiro, J.6
  • 16
    • 84922723785 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reporting of missing data and methods used to accommodate them in recent analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations
    • Gewandter JS, McDermott MP, Mckeown A, Smith SM, Williams MR, Hunsinger M, Farrar J, Turk DC, Dworkin RH. Reporting of missing data and methods used to accommodate them in recent analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations. PAIN 2014; 155: 1871-7.
    • (2014) PAIN , vol.155 , pp. 1871-1877
    • Gewandter, J.S.1    McDermott, M.P.2    McKeown, A.3    Smith, S.M.4    Williams, M.R.5    Hunsinger, M.6    Farrar, J.7    Turk, D.C.8    Dworkin, R.H.9
  • 20
    • 0028304329 scopus 로고
    • The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results
    • Goodman SN, Berlin JA. The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121: 200-6.
    • (1994) Ann Intern Med , vol.121 , pp. 200-206
    • Goodman, S.N.1    Berlin, J.A.2
  • 22
    • 33846563409 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why most published research findings are false
    • Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005; 2: e124.
    • (2005) PLoS Med , vol.2 , pp. e124
    • Ioannidis, J.P.1
  • 24
    • 0035822324 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
    • Juni P, Altman DG, EggerM. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001; 323: 42-6.
    • (2001) BMJ , vol.323 , pp. 42-46
    • Juni, P.1    Altman, D.G.2    Egger, M.3
  • 25
    • 33645062724 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Methodological issues in clinical trials of opioids for chronic pain
    • Katz N. Methodological issues in clinical trials of opioids for chronic pain. Neurology 2005; 65: S32-49.
    • (2005) Neurology , vol.65 , pp. S32-49
    • Katz, N.1
  • 26
    • 73449097194 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trial designs of analgesics: Focus on methodology
    • Katz N. Enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trial designs of analgesics: focus on methodology. Clin J Pain 2009; 25: 797-807.
    • (2009) Clin J Pain , vol.25 , pp. 797-807
    • Katz, N.1
  • 28
    • 40049083562 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Enriched Enrolment with Randomised Withdrawal (EERW): Time for a new look at clinical trial design in chronic pain
    • Mcquay HJ, Derry S, Moore RA, Poulain P, Legout V. Enriched Enrolment with Randomised Withdrawal (EERW): time for a new look at clinical trial design in chronic pain. PAIN 2008; 135: 217-20.
    • (2008) PAIN , vol.135 , pp. 217-220
    • McQuay, H.J.1    Derry, S.2    Moore, R.A.3    Poulain, P.4    Legout, V.5
  • 30
    • 0035901583 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials
    • Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 657-62.
    • (2001) Ann Intern Med , vol.134 , pp. 657-662
    • Moher, D.1    Schulz, K.F.2    Altman, D.G.3
  • 33
    • 84871484789 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: Extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement
    • Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ, Altman DG. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA 2012; 308: 2594-604.
    • (2012) JAMA , vol.308 , pp. 2594-2604
    • Piaggio, G.1    Elbourne, D.R.2    Pocock, S.J.3    Evans, S.J.4    Altman, D.G.5
  • 34
    • 85047692188 scopus 로고
    • Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
    • Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 408-12.
    • (1995) JAMA , vol.273 , pp. 408-412
    • Schulz, K.F.1    Chalmers, I.2    Hayes, R.J.3    Altman, D.G.4
  • 35
    • 2342572219 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Turning a blind eye: Authors have blinkered view of blinding
    • author reply 1136
    • Senn SJ. Turning a blind eye: authors have blinkered view of blinding. BMJ 2004; 328: 1135-6; author reply 1136.
    • (2004) BMJ , vol.328 , pp. 1135-1136
    • Senn, S.J.1
  • 36
    • 0022477197 scopus 로고
    • Confidence intervals for reporting results of clinical trials
    • Simon R. Confidence intervals for reporting results of clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 1986; 105: 429-35.
    • (1986) Ann Intern Med , vol.105 , pp. 429-435
    • Simon, R.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.