History and scholarship regarding U.S. education finance and policy

Handbook of Research in Education Finance and Policy, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 3-20

  Springer, Matthew G ^a   Houck, Eric A ^b   Guthrie, James W ^c  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064375714     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203788684     Document Type: Chapter

References (93)

1. Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. (2000). Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: What does the evidence show? Teachers College Record, 101, 5–26.
2. Barr, W., et al. (1970). Financing public elementary and secondary school facilities in the United States. National Educational Finance Project Special Study No. 7.
3. Benson, C. S. (1961). The economics of public education. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
4. Berends, M., Springer, M. G., Ballou, D., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of research on school choice. New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
5. Berne, R., & Stiefel, L. (1984). The measurement of equity in school finance: Conceptual, methodological, and empirical dimensions. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Bifulco, R., & Ladd, H. F. (2004). The impact of charter schools on student achievement: Evidence from NorthCarolina. Journal of Education Finance and Policy, 1, 50–91.
7. Booker, K., Gilpatric, S., Gronberg, T., & Jansen, D. (2008). The effect of charter schools on traditional public school students in Texas: Are children who stay behind left behind? Journal of Urban Economics, 64, 123–145.
8. Booker, K., Sass, T., Gill, B., & Zimmer, R. (2011). The effects of charter high schools on educational attainment. Journal of Labor Economics, 29, 377–415.
9. Booker, K., Sass, T., Gill, B., & Zimmer, R. (2014). Charter high schools’ effects on long-term attainment and earnings (CALDER Working Paper).
10. Burtless, G. (1996). Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
11. Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of effi-ciency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of the public schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Chubb, J., & Moe, T. (1990). Politics, markets and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
13. Clune, W. H. (1995). Educational adequacy: A theory and its remedies. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 28.
14. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, F., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15. Coons, J. E., Clune, W. H., & Sugarman, S. D. (1970). Private wealth and public education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Coons, J., & Sugarman, S. (1971). Family choice in education: A model state system for vouchers. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies.
17. Coons, J., & Sugarman, S. (1978). Education by choice: The case for family control. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
18. Cubberley, E. P. (1906). School funds and their apportionment. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Elementary and Secondary Education Act (1965).
20. Finn, C. (1983). Why NIE cannot be. Kappan, 64, 407–410.
21. Finn, C., Manno, B. V., & Vanourek, G. (2000). Charter schools in action: Renewing public education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Friedman, M. (1964). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Fryer, R. (2011). Teacher incentives and student achievement: Evidence from New York City Public Schools (NBER Working Paper No. 16850).
24. Fryer, R., Levitt, S. D., List, J., & Sadoff, S. (2012). Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: A field experiment (Working Paper).
25. Golden, M. (2004). Technology’s potential promise for enhancing student learning. T.H.E. Journal, 31, 42.
26. Goldring, E., & Smrekar, C. (2000). Magnet schools and the pursuit of racial balance. Education and Urban Society, 33, 17–35.
27. Grant, G. (1973). Shaping social policy: The politics of the Coleman Report. Teachers College Record, 75, 17–54.
28. Guthrie, J. W., Springer, M. G., Rolle, R. A., & Houck, E. A. (2007). Modern Educational Finance and Policy. Chicago: Allyn and Bacon.
29. Hall, G. R., & Stucker, J. P. (1971). Performance contracting in education: An introductory overview. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
30. Hanushek, E. (1991). When school finance “reform” may not be a good policy. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28, 423–456.
31. Hanushek, E. A. (2003). The failure of input-based schooling policies. Economic Journal, 113, F64–98.
32. Hanushek, E. (2006). Courting failure: How school finance lawsuits exploit and harm our children. Palo Alto, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
33. Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2004). How to improve the supply of high quality teachers. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings papers on educational policy 2004 (pp. 7–25), Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
34. Hatry, H. P., Greiner, J. M., & Ashford, B. G. (1994). Issues and case studies in teacher incentive plans (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
35. Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–14.
36. Hess, F. M. (2002). Revolution at the margins: The impact of competition on urban school systems. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
37. House, J. S. (1974). Understanding social factors and inequalities in health: 20thcentury progress and 21st century prospects. Journal of Healthand Social Behavior, 43, 2.
38. Howell, W. G., & Peterson, P. E. (2002). The education gap: Vouchers and urban schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
39. Howell, W. G., & Peterson, P. E. (2004). The use of theory in randomized field trials: Lessons from school voucher research on disaggregation, missing data, and the generalization of findings. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 634–657.
40. Hoxby, C. M. (2002). How school choice affects the achievement of public school students. In P. Hill (Ed.), Choice withequity. Palo Alto, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
41. Ingersoll, R., Merrill, L., & Stuckey, D. (2014). Seven trends: The transformation of the teaching force, updated April 2014. CPRE Report (#RR-80). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
42. Johns, R. L. (1938). An index of the financial ability of local school divisions to support public education. Montgomery: Alabama State Department of Education.
43. Kershaw, J. A., & McKean, R. N. (1962). Teacher shortages and salary schedules. New York: McGraw-Hill.
44. Krueger, A. B., & Zhu, P. (2002). Another look at the New York City voucher experiment (NBER Working Paper No. 9418). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
45. Ladd, H. F., & Hansen, J. S. (1999). Making money matter: Financing America’s schools. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
46. Laine, R. D., Greenwald, R., & Hedges, L. V. (1996). Money does matter: A research synthesis of a new universe of education production function studies. In L. Picus & J. Wattenbarger (Eds.), Where does the money go? (pp. 44–70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
47. Mann, D., & Inman, D. (1984). Improving education withexisting resources: The instructionally effective schools’ approach. Journal of Education Finance, 10, 259–269.
48. Marsh, J. A. et al. (2012). A big apple for educators: New York City’s experiment withschoolwide performance bonuses. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
49. Moehlman, A. B. (1925). Public education in Detroit. Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing.
50. Moehlman, A. B. (1932). Public school accounting. Review of Educational Research, 2, 99–104.
51. Morrison, H. C. (1924). The financing of public schools in the State of Illinois. Report of the educational finance inquiry commission IX. New York: Macmillan.
52. Morrison, H. C. (1930). School revenue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. Morrison, H. C. (1932). The management of the school money. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Mort, P. R. (1924). The measurement of educational need. New York: Columbia University Press.
55. Mort, P. R. (1926). State support for education. New York: Teachers College.
56. Mort, P. R. (1932). State support for education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
57. Mort, P. R. (1933). State support for public education, A report by the National Survey of School Finance. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
58. Murnane, R., & Cohen, D. K. (1985). The merits of merit pay. Public Interest, 80.
59. Murphy, J. T., & Cohen, D. K. (1974). Accountability in education: The Michigan experience. Public Interest, 36, 53–82.
60. Murray, S. E., Evans, W. N., & Schwab, R. M. (1998). Education finance reform and the distribution of education resources. American Economic Review, 88, 789–812.
61. National Commission on Excellence in Education (NCEE). (1983). A Nation at Risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
62. National Defense Education Act (1958).
63. National Education Access Network (2014). Costing out studies in states. Retrieved from www.schoolfunding.info/policy/CostingOut.
64. No Child Left Behind Act (2001).
65. Northwest Ordinance (1787).
66. Odden, A., & Clune, W. (1998). School finance systems: Aging structures in need of renovation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 157–177.
67. Odden, A., & Kelley, C. (1996). Paying teachers for what they know and do: New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
68. Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925).
69. Podgursky, M. (2007). Teams versus bureaucracies: Personal policy, wage-setting, and teacher quality in traditional public, charter, and private schools. In M. Berends, M. G. Springer, & H. Halberg (Eds.), Charter schools outcomes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
70. Protsik, J. (1995). History of teacher pay and incentive reforms. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Madison, WI: Finance Center.
71. Rose v. Council for Better Education, 790 S.W.2d 186 (Ky. 1989).
72. Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools. Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the blackwhite achievement gap. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute, and New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
73. Rouse, C. E. (1998). Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation of the Milwaukee parental choice program. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 553–602.
74. San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1, 93 1278 (S. Ct. 1973).
75. Serrano v. Priest, 5 Cal. 3d 584 (1971).
76. Smith, M., & O’Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233–268). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
77. Smith-Hughes Act. (1917). Springer, M. G., & Guthrie, J. W. (2007). The politicization of the school finance legal process. In M. R. West & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), School money trials: The legal pursuit of educational adequacy (pp. 102–131). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
78. Springer, M. G., Liu, K., & Guthrie, J. W. (2005). The impact of court-mandated reform on resource distribution: Is there anything special about adequacy? (Working Paper 12). Nashville, TN: Peabody Center for Education Policy.
79. Springer, M. G., et al. (2012). Team pay for performance: Experimental evidence from the Round Rock Pilot Project on Team Incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34, 367–390.
80. Springer, M. G., et al. (2013). Teacher pay for performance: Experimental evidence from the Project on Incentives in Teaching. Nashville, TN: National Center on Performance Incentives.
81. Strayer, G., & Haig, R. (1923). Financing of education in the State of New York. New York: Macmillan.
82. Teske, P., et al. (2001). Can charter schools change traditional public schools? In P. Peterson & D. Campbell (Eds.), Charters, vouchers and public education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
83. Tyack, D. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
84. Updegraff, H. (1922). Report of the Committee on Participation of teachers in management. Elementary School Journal, 22, 783–788.
85. Updegraff, H., & King, L. A. (1922). Survey of the fiscal policies of the State of Pennsylvania in the field of education. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
86. Verstegen, D. (2011). Public education finance systems in the United States and funding policies for populations withspecial educational needs. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/769.
87. Walberg, H. J., & Walberg, H. (1994). Losing local control. Educational Researcher, 23, 19–26.
88. Waterman, I. R. (1932). Equalization of the burden of support for education. University of California Publications in Education, 6, 285–358.
89. Welsh, J. (1972). Funds for research: A complex issue. Educational Researcher, 1, 17–18.
90. West, M. R., & Peterson, P. E. (Eds.) (2007). School money trials: The legal pursuit of educational adequacy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
91. Wise, A. (1970). Rich schools, poor schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
92. Witte, J. F. (1998). The Milwaukee voucher experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 229–251.
93. Wong, K. K., & Shen, F. X. (2007). Charter law and charter operation: Re-examining the charter school marketplace. In M. Berends, M. G. Springer, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Charter school outcomes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.