Magnet schools and the pursuit of racial balance

Education and Urban Society

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 17-35

  Coldring, Ellen ^a   Smrekar, Claire ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034343480     PISSN: 00131245     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013124500331003     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, Secretary of Transportation et al., 515 U.S. 200 (1995).
2. Blank, S. (1996). The pull of magnets. The American School Board Journal, 183(9), 34-36.
3. Blank, R., Levine, R., & Steel, L. (1996). After fifteen years: Magnet schools in urban education. In B. Fuller, R. Elmore, & G. Orfield (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 154-172). New York: Teachers College Press.
4. Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, No. 97-CV-482-P; 3:65-CV-1974-P (WDNC, September 1999).
5. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Schools. (1994). Magnet assistance program enrollment and participation report. Charlotte, NC: Author.
6. Eaton, S., & Crutcher, E. (1996). Magnets, media and mirages. In G. Orfield & S. Eaton (Eds.), Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of Education (pp. 265-289). New York: New Press.
7. Eisenberg v. Montgomery County Public Schools, 19F. Supp. 2d 449 (D. Md. 1998).
8. Hopwood v. Texas, No. 95-5006L, 95F.3d 53 (5th Cir. 1996).
9. Levine, R. (1997, April). Research on magnet schools and the context of school choice. Paper presented at the Citizens' Commission on Civil Rights Issues Forum: Magnet Schools and the Context of School Choice: Implications for Public Policy, Washington, DC.
10. Morris, J. (1997). Voluntary desegregation in St. Louis, Missouri: Impact on partnerships among schools, African-American families, and communities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
11. Morrison, P. A. (1992). Forecasting enrollments during court-ordered desegregation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
12. Orfield, G., Bachmeier, M., James, D., & Eitle, T. (1997). Deepening segregation in American public schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project on School Desegregation.
13. Plank, S., Schiller, K., Schneider, B., & Coleman, J. (1992, October). Choice in education: Some effects. Paper presented at the Economic Policy Institute symposium, Choice: What Role in American Education? Washington, DC.
14. Steel, L., & Eaton, M. (1996). Reducing, eliminating, and preventing minority isolation in American schools: The impact of the Magnet Schools Assistance Program. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
15. Steel, L., & Levine, R. (1994). Educational innovation in multiracial context: The growth of magnet schools in American education. Palo Alto, CA: American Institute for Research.
16. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Board of Education, 404 U.S. 811 (1971).
17. Taylor, W., & Yu, C. (1999). The context of magnet schools: The policies and politics of desegregation in Cincinnati and St. Louis. In C. Smrekar & E. Goldring (Eds.), School choice in urban American (pp. 15-25). New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Tuttle v. Arlington County School Board, No. 98-1604 (4th Cir. 1999).
19. Wells, A., & Crain, R. (1997). Stepping over the color line. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Wessman v. Gittens, 160 F.3d 790 (1st Cir. 1999).
21. Yu, C., & Taylor, W. (1997). Difficult choices: Do magnet schools serve children in need? Washington, DC: Citizens' Commission on Civil Rights.