Ambivalence and cognitive heuristics for dealing with ambiguity in complex social worlds;Ambivalencia y heurísticos cognitivos para tratar la ambig¨edad en mundos sociales complejos

Estudios de Psicologia

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 101-116

  Poddiakov, Alexander ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

ambiguity; ambivalence; control; development; diagnosis; dynamical systems; Heuristics; management; prognosis; social worlds

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064310523     PISSN: 02109395     EISSN: 15793699     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1174/021093906776173171     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ashby, W. R., (1962). Principles of self-organizing systems. In H., Von Foerster & G. W., Zopf, Jr. (Eds.), Principles of self- organization (pp. 255–278). (Sponsored by Information Systems Branch, U.S. Office of Naval Research).
2. Asmolov, A. G., (1996). KuPturno-istoricheskaya psychologia i konstruirivanie mirov {Cultural-historical psychology and design of worlds.} Moscow: Institute of Practical Psychology. Russian)
3. Baltes, P. B., (1999). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. In R. M., Lerner & J. V., Lerner (Eds.), Adolescence: Development, diversity and context (Vol. 1. Theoretical foundations and biological bases of development in adolescence, pp. 37–52). New York: Garland.
4. Bauer, M., (1995). Towards a functional analysis of resistance. In M., Bauer (Ed.), Resistance to New Technology (pp. 393–417). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Benson, C., (2001). The cultural psychology of self place, morality and art in human worlds. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
6. BRANCHING, Factor. In Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Branching_factor.
7. Dörner, D., (1997). The logic of failure: recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. New York: A Merloyd Lawrence Book.
8. Druzhinin, V. N., (2001). Kognitivnye sposobnosti: struktura, diagnostika, razvitie {Cognitive abilities: structure, diagnosis, development}.Moscow: Per Se. (Russian).
9. Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A., (1977/2002). Cognitive development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10. Frensch, P. A., & Funke, J., (Eds.) (1995). Complex problem solving: the European perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
11. Galperin, P. IA., & Danilova, V. L., (1980). Vospitanie systematicheskogo myshlenia v processe reshenia malyh tvorcheskih zadach [Formation of systemic thinking in solving “small” creative problems]. Voprosypsychologii, 1, 31–38. (Russian)
12. Grachyov, G., & Mel'nik I., (1999). Manipulirovanie lichnostiu: organizatsia, sposoby i technologii informatsionno-psychologicheskogo vozdeistvia {Manipulating with a personality: organization, methods and technologies of informational and psychological influence). Moscow: Institute of philosophy, Russian academy of sciences. Also available at: http://www.auditorium.ru/books/4047.
13. Guilford, J. P., (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: MC Graw Hill.
14. Haney, C., Banks, W. C., & Zimbardo, P. G., (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69–97. Also available at: http://www.prisonexp.org/pdf/ijcp1973.pdf.
15. Haney, C., & Zimbardo, P. G., (1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy: Twenty-five years after the Stanford Prison Experiment. American Psychologist, 53, 709–727. Also available at: http://www.prisonexp.org/pdf/ap1998.pdf.
16. Heuristics. In Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristics.
17. Kahneman, D., (2003). A perspective of judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Amrican psychologist, 58 (9), 697–720.
18. Lefebvre, V. A., (1977). The structure of awareness: Toward a symbolic language of human reflexion. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19. Lefebvre, V. A., (2003). Refleksia (Reflexion). Moscow: Cogito-Center. Russian).
20. Leonov, A. M., Fraktaly i tsikly razvitia system [Fractals and cycles of development of systems]. http://sins.xaoc.ru/pdf/articles/articles_r0l6.pdf. (Russian).
21. Lotman, I. M., (1992). Kul'tura i vzryv {Culture and explosion.] Moscow: Gnosis. Russian)
22. Löwy, I., (1992). The strength of loose concepts—boundary concepts, federative experimental strategies and disciplinary growth: the case study of immunology. History of Science, 30, 90, Part 4, 376–396
23. Malinetsky, G., & Potapov, A., (1998). Jokery, rusla, ili Poiski tretyei paradigmy [Jokers, channels, or Searches for the third paradigm]. Znanie—sila, 3, 19–34. (Russian).
24. Penrose, R., (1989). The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. Oxford, New York, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
25. Perret-Clermont, A.N., (1986). La construction de l'intelligence dans l'interaction sociale. Bern: Peter Lang.
26. Petukhov, V. V., (1999). Problema osmyslennogo deystvia (po resheniu tvorcheskih zadach) [A problem of meaningful action (for solving creative problems)]. In A. E., Voiskunsky, A. N., Zhdan, & O. K., Tikhomirov (Eds.), Traditsii i perspectivi deyatel'nostonogo podhoda v psychologii: shkola A.N. Leontieva [Traditions and perspectives of activity approach in psychology: A.N. Leontiev's school] (pp. 235–262). Moscow: Smysl. Russian).
27. Poddiakov, A. N., (2000). Issledovatel'skoe povedenie: Strategii poznania, pomosch', protivodeistvie, konflikt [Exploratory behavior: Cognitive strategies, help, counteraction, and conflict]. Moscow: Educational Internet portal “Obrazovanie: issledovano v mire”. http://www.oim.ru/reader.asp?nomer=50. (Russian).
28. Poddiakov, A. N., (2001.) Counteraction as a crucial factor of learning, education and development: Opposition to help. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2 (3). [On-line: available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-01/3-01poddiakov-e.htm]
29. Poddiakov, A. N., (2002). The space of responsibility of cultural psychology. Review essay on the book: Benson, C. The cultural psychology of self: place, morality and art in human worlds. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2001. Culture and psychology, 8 (3), 327–336.
30. Poddiakov, A., (2003). Test tvorchestva”sinya” ptitsa psychologii” [Test of creativity-”the “blue bird” of psychology.] Znaniea-'sila, 5, 101–104.
31. Poddiakov A., (2004). “Trojan horse” teaching in economic behavior. Internet-version of the paper presented at the international conference “Cross-fertilization between economics and psychology”. Drexel University, USA. Social Science Research Network. http://ssrn.com/abstract=627432.
32. Pospelov, D. A., (1989). Modelirovanie rassuzhdeniy. Opyt analiza myslitel'nyh aktov {Modeling of reasoning. Experience of analysis of acts of thinking.] Moscow: Radio I sviaz. Russian).
33. Pyatnitsyn, B. N., (1984). Ob aktivnosti model'nogo poznania [About activity of modeling cognition.] In D. P., Gorsky (Ed.), Tvorcheskaya priroda nauchnogo poznania {Creative nature of scientific cognition}. Moscow: Nauka. (Russian).
34. STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT: http://www.prisonexp.org.
35. Sunstein, C. R., (March 2003). Moral Heuristics. U Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 180. http://ssrn.com/abstract=387941.
36. Tikhomirov, O. K., (2002). Psychologia myshlenia {Psychology of thinking}. Moscow: Academia. (Russian).
37. Torrance, E. P., (2003). The Millenium: A time for looking forward and looking back. The journal of secondary gifted education, 15 (1), 6–12.
38. Tsukerman, G. A., (1998). Chto razvivaet i chego ne razvivaet uchebnaya deyatel'nost mladshih shkol'nikov? [What is and what is not developed by learning activity in junior schoolchildren?] Voprosy psychologii, 5, 68–81. (Russian)
39. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D., (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
40. UNDECIDABLE: http://www.serebella.com/encyclopedia/article-Undecidable.html.
41. Valsiner, J., (2000). Culture and human development. London: Sage.
42. Valsiner, J., Diriwächter, R., & Sauck, C., (2005). Diversity in unity: standard questions and nonstandard interpretations. In R., Bibace, J. D., Laird, K. L., Noller, & J., Valsiner (Eds.), Science and medicine in dialogue: Thinking through particulars and universals (pp. 289–307). Westport, CT: Praeger.
43. Valsiner, J., & Hill, P. E., (1989). Socialization of American toddlers for social courtesy. In J., Valsiner (Ed.), Child development in cultural context (pp. 163—179). Toronto/New York/Bern: Hogrefe & Huber.
44. Venda, V. F., (1990). Systemi hibridnogo intellekta: evolutsia, psychologia, informatika {Systems of hybrid intellect: evolution, psychology, informatics}. Moscow: Mashinostroenie. (Russian).
45. WEBSTER'S DESK DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE (1990). New York: Portland House.
46. Yaroshevsky, M. G., (1995). Sotsial'nye i psychologicheskie koordinaty nauchnogo tvorchestva [Social and psychological coordinates of scientific activity]. Voprosy filosofi, 12, 118–127. (Russian)
47. Zagorsky, V., (2002, April 30). Stanet li rossiyskaya intelligentsia sovest'iu natsii? [Will the Russian intelligentsia become the ‘nation's consciousness’?]. Russky Zhurnal. Available: http://www.russ.ru/ist_sovr/sumerki/20020430.html. (Russian)
48. Zimbardo, P., Web page: http://zimbardo.socialpsychology.org.