Art Education in a World of Cross-Purposes

Handbook of Research and Policy in Art Education

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 93-113

  Hope, Samuel ^a  

^a National Association of Schools of Art and Design   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85063500058     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410609939-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Best, H. M. (2000). Art, words, intellect, emotion. Arts Education Policy Review, 101(6), 3-11;
2. Best, H. M. (2000). Art, words, intellect, emotion. Arts Education Policy Review, 102(1), 3-10.
3. Brooks, D. (2001, November 5). The age of conflict. The Weekly Standard, 19-23.
4. Chapman, L. (1982). Instant art, instant culture: The unspoken policy for American schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Consortium of National Arts Education Associations. (1994). National Standards for Arts Education. Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference. Author.
6. Davis, M. (1998). Making a case for design-based learning. Arts Education Policy Review, 100(2), 7-15.
7. Dorn, C. M. (2001). Art education and the iron triangle's new plan. Arts Education Policy Review, 103(1), 3-11.
8. Drucker, P. L. (1970). Long range planning. In Technology, management, and society (pp. 129-148). New York: Harper & Row.
9. Eisner, E. W. (2001). Should we create new aims for art education? Art Education, 54(5), 6-10.
10. Elkins, J. (2001). The ivory tower of tearlessness. The Chronicle of Higher Education, November 9, B, 7.
11. Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
12. Gee, C. B. (1999a). "For you dear-anything!" Omnipotence, omnipresence, and servitude "through the arts, " Part I.Arts Education Policy Review, 100(4), 3-18.
13. Gee, C. B. (1999b). "For you dear-anything!" Omnipotence, omnipresence, and servitude "through the arts, " Part II.Arts Education Policy Review, 100(5), 3-22.
14. Gelernter, D. (2001, January). Computers and the pursuit of happiness. Commentary, 31-35.
15. Gerzon, M. (1996). A house divided: Six-belief systems struggling for America's soul. New York: Most/Tarcher, Putnam Publishing Group.
16. Healy, J. M. (1998). Failure to connect: How computers affect our children's minds for better and worse. New York: Simon & Schuster.
17. Hooker, M. (1987). Moral values and private philanthropy. Grantmakers in the Arts Reader, 12(1), 1-38.
18. Hope, S. (1990). Technique and arts education. Design for Arts in Education, 91(6), 2-14.
19. Hope, S. (2002). Policy frameworks, research, and k-12 schooling. In R. Colwell & C. Richardson (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning handbook for research in music education (pp. 5-16). New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Hymowitz, K. S. (Spring, 2000). The teening of childhood. American Educator, 20-47.
21. Hymowitz, K. S. (Spring, 2001). Parenting: The lost art. American Educator, 4-9.
22. Knight, C. (2001, November 4). What exactly can art heal? Los Angeles Times, 8.
23. McCarthy, K. F., Brooks, A., Lowell, J., & Zakaras, L. (2001). The performing arts in a new era. Phiiladelphia: RAND and the Pew Charitable Trusts.
24. Ortega y Gasset, J. (1961). The modern theme. New York: Harper & Row.
25. Ruddick, L. (2001, November 23). The near enemy of the humanities is professionalism. The Chronicle of Higher Education, B, 7-9.
26. Ruggiero, V. R. (Summer, 2000). Bad attitude: Confronting the views that hinder students' learning. American Educator, 10-48.
27. Smith, R. A. (1989). The sense of art: A study in aesthetic education. New York: Routledge.
28. Smith, R. A. (1993). The question of multiculturalism. Arts Education Policy Review, 94(4), 2-18.
29. Smith, R. A. (1995). Elitism and populism. In Excellence II: The continuing quest in education (pp. 97-114). Reston, VA: National Art Education.
30. Windschuttle, K. (2002). The cultural war on western civilization. The New Criterion, 20(5), 4-16.