Making a case for design-based learning

Arts Education Policy Review

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 7-15

  Davis, Meredith ^a  

^a Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894193968     PISSN: 10632913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10632919809599450     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Project 2061. 1989. Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Black, P., and J. M. Atkin. 1996. Changing the subject: Innovations in science, mathematics, and technology education. New York: Routledge, with Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in Paris, France.
3. Consortium of National Arts Education Associations. 1994. National standards for arts education: What every young American should know and be able to do in the arts. Reston, Va.: Music Educators National Conference.
4. Drucker, Johanna. 1994. The visible world: Experimental typography and modern an, 1909-1923. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
5. Joyce, M. 1994. Of Two Minds: Hypertext Pedagogy and Poetics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
6. Massel, D., S. Fuhrmann, M. Kirst, A. Odden, P. Wohlstetter, R. Carver, and G. Yee. 1993. Ten years of state education reform, 1983-1993. New Brunswick, N. J.: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
7. National Center on Education and the Economy and the University of Pittsburgh. 1997. Performance standards, vol. 2, Middle school. Washington, D.C.: National Center on Education and the Economy.
8. National Council on Education Standards and Testing. 1992. Raising standards for American education. Washington, D.C.: Superintendent of Documents and Government Printing Office.
9. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences. 1996. National science education standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.