Detecting Social Roles in Twitter

EMNLP 2016 - Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media, SocialNLP 2016

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 34-40

  Mac Kim, Sunghwan ^a   Wan, Stephen ^a   Paris, Cécile ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEARNING ALGORITHMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; POPULATION STATISTICS;

ANNOTATED DATASETS; DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS; MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES; MEDIA CONTENT; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL ROLES; SOCIAL SCIENTISTS; WORDS CLUSTERS;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 85063091871     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Martha Augoustinos, Iain Walker, and Ngaire Donaghue. 2014. Social cognition: an integrated introduction. SAGE London, third edition.
2. Charley Beller, Rebecca Knowles, Craig Harman, Shane Bergsma, Margaret Mitchell, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2014. I'm a belieber: Social roles via self-identification and conceptual attributes. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 181-186, Baltimore, Maryland, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. Peter F. Brown, Peter V. deSouza, Robert L. Mercer, Vincent J. Della Pietra, and Jenifer C. Lai. 1992. Class-based n-gram models of natural language. Computational Linguistics, 18(4):467-479, December.
4. Amanda Dennett, Surya Nepal, Cecile Paris, and Bella Robinson. 2016. Tweetripple: Understanding your twitter audience and the impact of your tweets. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, November. IEEE.
5. Katja Filippova. 2012. User demographics and language in an implicit social network. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 1478-1488, Jeju Island, Korea, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Jenny Rose Finkel, Alex Kleeman, and Christopher D. Manning. 2008. Efficient, feature-based, Conditional Random Field parsing. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 959-967, Columbus, Ohio, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Lingpeng Kong, Nathan Schneider, Swabha Swayamdipta, Archna Bhatia, Chris Dyer, and Noah A. Smith. 2014. A dependency parser for tweets. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1001-1012, Doha, Qatar, October. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Terry Koo, Xavier Carreras, and Michael Collins. 2008. Simple semi-supervised dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 595-603, Columbus, Ohio, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. John D. Lafferty, Andrew McCallum, and Fernando C. N. Pereira. 2001. Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 282-289, San Francisco, CA, USA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
10. Dong C. Liu and Jorge Nocedal. 1989. On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Mathematical Programming, 45(3):503-528, Dec.
11. J. MacQueen. 1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Statistics, pages 281-297, Berkeley, California. University of California Press.
12. Andrew McCallum and Wei Li. 2003. Early results for named entity recognition with conditional random fields, feature induction and web-enhanced lexicons. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 188-191, Edmonton, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. Andrew Kachites McCallum. 2002. Mallet: A machine learning for language toolkit.
14. Tomas Mikolov, Wen-tau Yih, and Geoffrey Zweig. 2013. Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 746-751, Atlanta, Georgia, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. Alan Mislove, Sune Lehmann, Yong-Yeol Ahn, Jukka-Pekka Onnela, and J. Niels Rosenquist. 2011. Understanding the demographics of twitter users. In Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pages 554-557. The AAAI Press.
16. Maarten Sap, Gregory Park, Johannes Eichstaedt, Margaret Kern, David Stillwell, Michal Kosinski, Lyle Ungar, and Hansen Andrew Schwartz. 2014. Developing age and gender predictive lexica over social media. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1146-1151, Doha, Qatar, October. Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. Luke Sloan, Jeffrey Morgan, Pete Burnap, and Matthew Williams. 2015. Who tweets? deriving the demographic characteristics of age, occupation and social class from twitter user meta-data. PLoS ONE, 10(3):e0115545, 03.
18. Valentin I. Spitkovsky, Hiyan Alshawi, Angel X. Chang, and Daniel Jurafsky. 2011. Unsupervised dependency parsing without gold part-of-speech tags. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1281-1290, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK., July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
19. Joseph Turian, Lev-Arie Ratinov, and Yoshua Bengio. 2010. Word representations: A simple and general method for semi-supervised learning. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 384-394, Uppsala, Sweden, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. Frank Wilcoxon. 1945. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6):80-83.