Economic evaluations of public health implementation-interventions: a systematic review and guideline for practice

Public Health

Volumn 169, Issue , 2019, Pages 101-113

  Reeves, P ^a,b,c   Edmunds, K ^b   Searles, A ^a,b,c   Wiggers, J ^a,b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^b HUNTER MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^d HUNTER NEW ENGLAND POPULATION HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; GUIDELINE; HEALTH POLICY; INVESTMENT; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; PUBLIC HEALTH;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INVESTMENT; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ECONOMICS; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

SCOPUS;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85062722762     PISSN: 00333506     EISSN: 14765616     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.01.012     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Brownson, R.C., Colditz, G.A., Proctor, E.K., Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. 2012, Oxford Scholarship Online.
2. Lobb, R., Colditz, G.A., Implementation science and its application to population health. Annu Rev Public Health 34 (2013), 235–251.
3. Lal, A., Moodie, M., Peeters, A., Carter, R., Inclusion of equity in economic analyses of public health policies: systematic review and future directions. Aust N Z J Public Health 42 (2018), 207–213.
4. Drummond, M., Weatherly, H., Claxton, K., Cookson, R., Ferguson, B., Godfrey, C., et al. Assessing the challenges of applying standard methods of economic evaluation to public health interventions. 2007, Public Health Research Consortium, York.
5. Wanless, D., Securing good health for the whole population: final report., 2004 http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/D/3/Wanless04_summary.pdf.
6. Weatherly, H., Drummond, M., Claxton, K., Cookson, R., Ferguson, B., Godfrey, C., et al. Methods for assessing the cost-effectiveness of public health interventions: key challenges and recommendations. Health Policy 93 (2009), 85–92.
7. Hoomans, T., Ament, A.J.H.A., Evers, S.M.A.A., Severens, J.L., Implementing guidelines into clinical practice: what is the value?. J Eval Clin Pract 17 (2011), 606–614.
8. Hoomans, T., Evers, S.M., Ament, A.J., Hubben, M.W., van der Weijden, T., Grimshaw, J.M., et al. The methodological quality of economic evaluations of guideline implementation into clinical practice: a systematic review of empiric studies. Value Health: J Inter Soc Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 10 (2007), 305–316.
9. Drummond, M.F., O'Brien, B.J., Stoddart, G.L., Torrance, G.W., Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2 ed., 1997, Oxford Univeristy Press, Oxford.
10. Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 29 (2013), 117–122.
11. Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group (EPOC), Data collection checklist. 2002 Available from: http://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/datacollectionchecklist.pdf. (Accessed 23 October 2017)
12. Grimshaw, J.M., Thomas, R.E., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C.R., Vale, L., et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), vol. 8, 2004, 1–72 iii-iv.
13. Sanders, G.D., Neumann, P.J., Basu, A., Brock, D.W., Feeny, D., Krahn, M., et al. Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Jama 316 (2016), 1093–1103.
14. Siegel, J.E., Weinstein, M.C., Russell, L.B., Gold, M.R., Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Jama 276 (1996), 1339–1341.
15. Hoomans, T., Severens, J.L., Economic evaluation of implementation strategies in health care. Implement Sci, 9, 2014, 168.
16. Luhnen, M., Prediger, B., Neugebauer, E.A.M., Mathes, T., Systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: a protocol for a systematic review of characteristics and methods applied. Syst Rev, 6, 2017, 238.
17. Anderson, R., Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: utility or futility?. Health Econ 19 (2010), 350–364.
18. Gonzalez-Perez, J.G., Developing a scoring system to quality assess economic evaluations. Eur J Health Econ: HEPAC: Health Econ Prev Care 3 (2002), 131–136.
19. Andersen, M.R., Hager, M., Su, C., Urban, N., Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities. Health Educ Behav: Off Pub Soc Pub Health Edu 29 (2002), 755–770.
20. Costanza, M.E., Stoddard, A.M., Luckmann, R., White, M.J., Spitz Avrunin, J., Clemow, L., Promoting mammography: results of a randomized trial of telephone counseling and a medical practice intervention. Am J Prev Med 19 (2000), 39–46.
21. Crane, L.A., Leakey, T.A., Ehrsam, G., Rimer, B.K., Warnecke, R.B., Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple outcalls to promote mammography among low-income women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev: Pub Am Assoc Cancer Res Cosponsored Am Soc Prev Oncol 9 (2000), 923–931.
22. Franzini, L., Boom, J., Nelson, C., Cost-effectiveness analysis of a practice-based immunization education intervention. Ambul Pediatr 7 (2007), 167–175.
23. Hirai, K., Ishikawa, Y., Fukuyoshi, J., Yonekura, A., Harada, K., Shibuya, D., et al. Tailored message interventions versus typical messages for increasing participation in colorectal cancer screening among a non-adherent population: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 16, 2016, 431.
24. Kim, M., Yoo, B.-K., Cost-effectiveness analysis of a television campaign to promote seasonal influenza vaccination among the elderly. Value Health 18 (2015), 622–630.
25. Navarro, H.J., Shakeshaft, A., Doran, C.M., Petrie, D.J., Does increasing community and liquor licensees' awareness, police activity, and feedback reduce alcohol-related violent crime? A benefit-cost analysis. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 10 (2013), 5490–5506.
26. Schuster, A.L., Frick, K.D., Huh, B.-Y., Kim, K.B., Kim, M., Han, H.-R., Economic evaluation of a community health worker-led health literacy intervention to promote cancer screening among Korean American women. J Health Care Poor Underserved 26 (2015), 431–440.
27. Slater, J.S., Parks, M.J., Malone, M.E., Henly, G.A., Nelson, C.L., Coupling financial incentives with direct mail in population-based practice: a randomized trial of mammography promotion. Health Educ Behav 44 (2017), 165–174.
28. Stockdale, S.E., Keeler, E., Duan, N., Derose, K.P., Fox, S.A., Costs and cost-effectiveness of a church-based intervention to promote mammography screening. Health Serv Res 35 (2000), 1037–1057.
29. Sutherland, R., Reeves, P., Campbell, E., Lubans, D.R., Morgan, P.J., Nathan, N., et al. Cost effectiveness of a multi-component school-based physical activity intervention targeting adolescents: the 'Physical Activity 4 Everyone' cluster randomized trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ, 13, 2016, 94.
30. van Keulen, H.M., Bosmans, J.E., van Tulder, M.W., Severens, J.L., de Vries, H., Brug, J., et al. Cost-effectiveness of tailored print communication, telephone motivational interviewing, and a combination of the two: results of an economic evaluation alongside the Vitalum randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ, 7, 2010 no pagination.
31. van Keulen, H.M., Bosmans, J.E., van Tulder, M.W., Severens, J.L., de Vries, H., Brug, J., et al. Cost-effectiveness of tailored print communication, telephone motivational interviewing, and a combination of the two: results of an economic evaluation alongside the Vitalum randomized controlled trial": Correction. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ, 8, 2011, 8 ArtID 4. 2011.
32. Wu, J.H., Fung, M.C., Chan, W., Lairson, D.R., Cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions to enhance mammography compliance using computer modeling (CAN*TROL). Value Health 7 (2004), 175–185.
33. Trapero-Bertran, M., Acera Perez, A., de Sanjose, S., Manresa Dominguez, J.M., Rodriguez Capriles, D., Rodriguez Martinez, A., et al. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to increase screening coverage for cervical cancer in Spain: the CRIVERVA study. BMC Public Health, 17, 2017, 194.
34. van Mastrigt, G.A., Hiligsmann, M., Arts, J.J., Broos, P.H., Kleijnen, J., Evers, S.M., et al. How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1/3). Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 16 (2016), 689–704.
35. Drummond, M.F., Jefferson, T.O., Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party. BMJ 313 (1996), 275–283.
36. Buxton, M.J., Drummond, M.F., Van Hout, B.A., Prince, R.L., Sheldon, T.A., Szucs, T., et al. Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life. Health Econ 6 (1997), 217–227.
37. Cleemput, I., Kesteloot, K., Economic implications of non-compliance in health care. Lancet 359 (2002), 2129–2130.
38. Cleemput, I., Kesteloot, K., DeGeest, S., A review of the literature on the economics of noncompliance. Room for methodological improvement. Health Policy 59 (2002), 65–94.