Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Interventions to Enhance Mammography Compliance Using Computer Modeling (CAN*TROL)

Value in Health

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 175-185

  Wu, Jasmanda H ^a,c   Fung, Man C ^b   Chan, Wenyaw ^a   Lairson, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b ELI LILLY AND COMPANY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer screening; CAN*TROL; Cost effectiveness analysis; Mammography; Tailored telephone counseling intervention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT COUNSELING; PHYSICIAN; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1842613692     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.72326.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2002 [Internet]. Washington: The Society, 2002. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CancerFacts&Figures2002TM.pdf.
2. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2001-2002 [Internet]. Washington: The Society, c2001. Available from: http://www. cancer.org/downloads/STT/BrCaFF2001.pdf.
3. Wagner TH. The effectiveness of mailed patient reminders on mammography screening: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 1998;14:64-70.
4. Snell J, Buck E. Increasing cancer screening: a meta-analysis. Prev Med 1996;25:702-7.
5. Burack RC, Gimotty PA, George J, et al. The effects of patient and physician reminders on use of screening mammography in a health maintenance organization. Cancer 1996;78:1708-21.
6. King E, Rimer BK, Seay J, et al. Promoting mammography use through progressive interventions: is it effective? Am J Public Health 1994;84:104-6.
7. Mayer JA. Facility-based inreach strategies to promote annual mammograms. Am J Prev Med 1994;10:353-6.
8. Fletcher SW. Increasing mammography utilization: a controlled study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85:112-20.
9. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2000 [CD-Rom]. Atlanta: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001.
10. Blackman DK, Bennett EM, Miller DS. Trends in self-reported use of mammograms (1989-1997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991-1997) behavioral risk factor surveillance system. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep CDC Surveillance Summaries 1999;48:1-22.
11. Weber BE, Reilly BM. Enhancing mammography use in the inner city: a randomized trial of intensive care management. Arch Intern Med 1997;157: 2345-9.
12. Atri J, Falshaw M, Gregg R, et al. Improving uptake of breast screening in multiethnic populations: a randomized controlled trial using practice reception staff to contact nonattenders. Br Med J 1997;315:1356-9.
13. Mandelblatt JH, Freeman D, Winczewski K, et al. The costs and effects of cervical and breast cancer screening in a public hospital emergency room. Am J Public Health 1997;87:1182-9.
14. Whitman S, Lacey L, Ansell D, et al. An intervention to increase breast and cervical cancer screening in low-income African-American women. Fam Community Health 1994;17:56-63.
15. Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review. 1973-1998. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute, 2001.
16. Lantz PM, Stencil D, Lippert MT, et al. Breast and cervical cancer screening in a low-income managed care sample: the efficacy of physician letter and phone calls. Am J Public Health 1995;85:834-6.
17. Kohatsu ND, Cramer E, Bohnstedt M. Use of a clinician reminder system for screening mammography in a public health clinic. Am J Prev Med 1994;10:348-52.
18. Harris RP, Fletcher SW, Gonzalez JJ, et al. Mammography and age: are we targeting the wrong women? A community survey of women and physicians. Cancer 1993;67:2010-4.
19. Dawson DA, Thompson GB. Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Screening: United States, 1987. (DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 90-1500). Hyattsville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, 1990:1-33.
20. Marchant DJ, Sutton SM. Use of mammography-United States, 1990. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1990;30:621-30.
21. Lane DS, Polednak AP, Burg MA. Measuring the impact of varied interventions on community-wide breast cancer screening. In: Anderson PN, Engstrom PF, Mortenson LE, eds., Advances in Cancer Control: Innovations and Research. New York: A.R. Liss, 1989.
22. National Center for Health Statistics. Health People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health [Internet]. Available from: http://www.healthypeople. gov/document/pdf/Volume1/03Cancer.pdf.
23. Davis NA, Lewis MJ, Rimer BK, et al. Evaluation of a phone intervention to promote mammography in a managed care plan. Am J Health Promot 1997;11:247-9.
24. Crane LA, Leakey TA, Rimer BK, et al. Effectiveness of a telephone outcall intervention to promote screening mammography among low-income women. Prev Med 1998;27(Suppl):S39-49.
25. Lipkus IM, Rimer BK, Halabi S, Strigo TS. Can tailored interventions increase mammography use among HMO women? Am J Prev Med 2000;18:1-10.
26. Rosenstock IM. The health belief model: explaining health behavior through expectancies. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer B, eds., Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990.
27. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Velicer WF, Rossi JS. Standardized, individualized, interactive, and personalized self-help programs for smoking cessation. Health Psychol 1993;12:399-405.
28. Rakowski W, Fulton JP, Feldman JP. Women's decision making about mammography: a replication of the relationship between stages of adoption and decisional balance. Health Psychol 1993; 12:209-14.
29. Janus IL. Counseling on Personal Decisions. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.
30. Thompson B, Thompson LA, Andersen MR, et al. Costs and cost-effectiveness of a clinical intervention to increase mammography utilization in an inner city public health hospital. Prev Med 2002;35:87-96.
31. Taylor V, Thompson B, Lessler D, et al. A clinic-based mammography intervention targeting innercity women. J Gen Intern Med 1999;14:104-11.
32. Costanza ME, Stoddard AM, Luckmann R, et al. Promoting mammography: results of a randomized trial of telephone counseling and a medical practice intervention. Am J Prev Med 2000;19:39-46.
33. Guide to Using CAN*TROL (Version 2, Beta) Bethesda: National Cancer Institute, 1998.
34. Eddy DM, Hasselblad V, McGivney W, Hendee W. The value of mammography screening in women under age 50 years. JAMA 1988;259:1512-9.
35. Eddy DM. CAN*TROL: a computer model for designing national cancer control strategies. Bull Cancer 1987;74:323-32.
36. U.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000 Data for the State of Texas [Internet]. Washington: The Bureau, 2000. Available from: http://www.census.gov/census2000/states/tx.html.
37. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [Internet]. Bethesda: The Institute, 2000. Available from: http://www. seer.cancer.gov/publicdata.
38. Yabroff KR, Omalley A, Mangan P, Mandelblatt J. Inreach and outreach interventions to improve mammography use. J Am Womens Assoc 2001;56: 166-73.
39. Yabroff KR, Mandelblatt JS. Interventions targeted toward patients to increase mammography use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8: 749-57.
40. Mandelblatt JS, Yabroff KR. Effectiveness of interventions designed to increase mammography use: a meta-analysis of provider-targeted strategies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:759-67.
41. Ernster VL, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, et al. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast cancer. JAMA 1996;275:913-8.
42. Brown MI, Houn F, Sickles EA, Kessler LG. Screening mammography in community practice positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:1373-7.
43. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, et al. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examination. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1089-96.
44. Weinstein ML, Torrance GN. Time preference. In: Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weistein MC, eds., Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford; 1996.
45. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Most Requested Statistics [Internet]. Washington: The Bureau; c2004. Available from: http://www.bls.gov/data/top20.htm.
46. Salzmann P, Kerlikowske K, Phillips K. Cost-effectiveness of extending screening mammography guidelines to include women 40-49 years of age. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:955-65.
47. Taplin SH, Barlow W, Urban N, et al. Stage, age, comorbidity, and direct costs of colon, prostate, and breast cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87:417-26.
48. Houn F, Brown M. Current practice of screening mammography in the United States: data from the national survey of mammography facilities. Radiology 1994;190:209-15.
49. Brown M, Fintor L. U.S. screening mammography services with mobile units: results from the national survey of mammography facilities. Radiology 1995;195:529-32.
50. Rimer BK, Halabi S, Skinner CS, et al. Effects of a mammography decision-making intervention at 12 and 24 months. Am J Prev Med 2002;22:247-57.
51. Stockdale SE, Keeler E, Duan N, et al. Costs and cost-effectiveness of a church-based intervention to promote mammography screening. Health Serv Res 2000;35:1037-57.
52. Duan N, Fox SA, Derose KP, Carson S. Maintaining mammography adherence through telephone counseling in a church-based trial. Am J Public Health 2000;90:1468-71.
53. Taplin SH, Barlow WE, Ludman E, et al. Testing reminder and motivational telephone calls to increase screening mammography: a randomized study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:233-42.
54. Fishman P, Taplin S, Meyer D, Barlow W. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to enhance mammography use. Eff Clin Pract 2000;4:213-20.
55. Saywell RM, Champion VL, Skinner CS, et al. Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening. Prev Med 1999;29:374-82.
56. Gotzsche PC, Olsen O. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 2000; 355:129-34.
57. Davis JA, Smith TW. General Social Survey, 1972-1994: Cumulative Codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, 1994.