Impact of land use and climate change on water-related ecosystem services in Kentucky, USA

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 102, Issue , 2019, Pages 51-64

  Bai, Yang ^a,b   Ochuodho, Thomas O ^a   Yang, Jian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b KEY LABORATORY OF TROPICAL FOREST ECOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Climate change; Ecosystem service; InVEST; Kentucky; Land use

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; LAND USE; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS;

COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; INHIBITORY EFFECT; INVEST; KENTUCKY; LAND MANAGEMENTS; LANDSCAPE COMPOSITION; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; GLOBAL CHANGE; LAND USE CHANGE; MODEL; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS; WATER; WATER RETENTION;

KENTUCKY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85061662564     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.079     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Albert, C., Galler, C., Hermes, J., Neuendorf, F., von Haaren, C., Lovett, A., Applying ecosystem services indicators in landscape planning and management: the ES-in-Planning framework. Ecol. Ind. 60 (2015), 100–113.
2. Aldieri, L., Vinci, C.P., The role of technology spillovers in the process of water pollution abatement for large international firms. Sustainability., 9, 2017, 868.
3. Bai, Y., Jiang, B., Wang, M., Li, H., Alatalo, J.M., Huang, S.F., New ecological redline policy (ERP) to secure ecosystem services in China. Land Use Policy 55 (2016), 348–351.
4. Bai, Y., Zheng, H., Ouyang, Z.Y., Zhuang, C.W., Jiang, B., Modeling hydrological ecosystem services and tradeoffs: a case study in Baiyangdian watershed, China. Environ. Earth Sci. 70 (2013), 709–718.
5. Bai, Y., Zhuang, C.W., Ouyang, Z.Y., Zheng, H., Jiang, B., Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed. Ecol. Complexity 8 (2011), 177–183.
6. Bateman, I.J., Harwood, A.R., Mace, G.M., Watson, R.T., Abson, D.J., et al. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. Science 341:6141 (2013), 45–50.
7. BEA (Bureau of Economic Analysis), 2017. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.bea.gov.
8. Bernues, A., Rodríguez-Ortega, T., Ripoll-Bosch, R., Alfnes, F., Socio-cultural and economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by Mediterranean mountain agroecosystems. PLoS One, 9(7), 2014, e102479.
9. Bhaduri, B., Harbor, J., Engel, B., Grove, M., Assessing watershed-scale, long term hydrologic impacts of land use change using a GIS-NPS model. Environ. Manag. 26:6 (2000), 643–658.
10. Egan, P., Price, M.F., Mountain Ecosystem Services and Climate Change. 2017, The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris, France.
11. Cabral, P., Feger, C., Levrel, H., Chambolle, M., Basque, D., Assessing the impact of land-cover changes on ecosystem services: a first step toward integrative planning in Bordeaux, France. Ecosyst. Services 22 (2016), 318–327.
12. Castillo, C.R., Güneralp, I., Güneralp, B., Influence of changes in developed land and precipitation on hydrology of a coastal Texas watershed. Appl. Geogr. 47 (2014), 154–167.
13. Chuai, X.W., Huang, X.J., Wu, C.Y., Li, J.B., Lu, Q.L., Qi, X.X., Zhang, M., Zuo, T.H., Lu, J.Y., Land use and ecosystems services value changes and ecological land management in coastal Jiangsu, China. Habitat Int. 57 (2016), 164–174.
14. EEA, The European Environment-State and Outlook 2015: European Briefings-Biodiversity. State of the Environment Report. 2015, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
15. Fu, Q., Li, B., Hou, Y., Bi, X., Zhang, X.S., Effects of land use and climate change on ecosystem services in Central Asia's arid regions: a case study in Altay Prefecture, China. Sci. Total Environ. 607–608 (2017), 633–646.
16. Gleeson, E., Greenwood, G.B., Big data are all the rage-for mountains. Too. Mountain Res. Develop. 35 (2015), 87–89.
17. Hao, R.F., Yu, D.Y., Liu, Y.P., Liu, Y., Qiao, J.M., Wang, X., Du, J.S., Impacts of changes in climate and landscape pattern on ecosystem services. Sci. Total Environ. 579 (2017), 718–728.
18. Hoyer, R., Chang, H., Assessment of freshwater ecosystem services in the Tualatin and Yamhill basins under climate change and urbanization. Appl. Geogr. 53 (2014), 402–416.
19. Kemp, R., Pontoglio, S., The Innovation Effects of Environmental policy instruments – a typical case of the blind men and the elephant. Ecol. Econ. 72 (2011), 28–36.
20. Kim, I., Arnhold, S., Ahn, S., Le, Q.B., Kim, S.J., Park, S.J., Koellner, T., Land use change and ecosystem services in mountainous watersheds: Predicting the consequences of environmental policies with cellular automata and hydrological modeling. Environ. Modell. Software, 2017, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.018.
21. Kindu, M., Schneider, T., Teketay, D., Knoke, T., Changes of ecosystem service values in response to land use/land cover dynamics in Munessa-Shashemene landscape of the Ethiopian highlands. Sci. Total Environ. 547 (2016), 137–147.
22. Kreuter, U.P., Harris, H.G., Matlock, M.D., Lacey, R.E., Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas. Ecol. Econ. 39:3 (2001), 333–346.
23. La Notte, A., D'Amato, D., Mäkinen, H., Paracchini, M.L., Liquete, C., Egoh, B., Geneletti, D., Crossman, N.D., Ecosystem services classification: a systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework. Ecol. Ind. 74 (2017), 392–402.
24. Lautenbach, S., Kegel, C., Lausch, A., Seppelt, R., Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data. Ecol. Ind. 11 (2011), 676–687.
25. Li, Y., Feng, Y., Guo, X.R., Peng, F., Changes in coastal city ecosystem service values based on land use – a case study of Yingkou, China. Land Use Policy 65 (2017), 287–293.
26. Lindberg, T.T., Bernhardt, E.S., Bier, R., Helton, A.M., Merola, R.B., Vengosh, A., Giulio, R.T.D., Cumulative impacts of mountaintop mining on an Appalachian watershed. PNAS 108:52 (2011), 20929–20934.
27. Lorencová, E.K., Harmáčková, Z.V., Landová, L., Pártl, A., Vačkář, D., Assessing impact of land use and climate change on regulating ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Ecosyst. Health Sustainability, 2(3), 2016, e01210.
28. Martinez-Harms, M.J., Bryan, B.A., Figueroa, E., Pliscoff, P., Runting, R.K., Wilson, K.A., Scenarios for land use and ecosystem services under global change. Ecosyst. Serv. 25 (2017), 56–68.
29. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
30. Mononen, L., Auvinen, A.P., Ahokumpu, A.L., Rönka, M., Aarras, N., Tolvanen, G., Kamppinen, M., Viirret, E., Kumpula, T., Vihervaara, P., National ecosystem service indicators: measures of social-ecological sustainability. Ecol. Ind. 1 (2016), 26–37.
31. Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D., Chan, K.M.A., Daily, G.C., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P.M., Lonsdorf, E., Naidoo, R., Ricketts, T.H., Shaw, M., Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7 (2009), 4–11.
32. Olander, L.P., Johnston, R.J., Tallis, H., Benefit relevant indicators: Ecosystem services measures that link ecological and social outcomes. Ecol. Ind. 85 (2018), 1262–1272.
33. Omernik, J.M., Griffith, G.E., Ecoregions of the conterminous United States: evolution of a hierarchical spatial framework. Environ. Manage. 54:6 (2014), 1249–1266.
34. Parmesan, C., Yohe, G., A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421 (2003), 37–42.
35. Quintas-Soriano, C., Castro, A.J., Castro, H., García-Llorente, M., Impacts of land use change on ecosystem services and implications for human well-being in Spanish drylands. Land Use Policy 54 (2016), 534–548.
36. Rocca, M.E., Brown, P.M., MacDonald, L.H., Carrico, C.M., Climate change impacts on fire regimes and key ecosystem services in Rocky Mountain forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 327 (2014), 290–305.
37. Romeo, R., Vita, A., Testolin, R., Hofer, T., Mapping the Vulnerability of Mountain Peoples to Food Insecurity. 2015, FAO, Rome.
38. Runting, R.K., Bryan, B.A., Dee, L.E., Maseyk, F.J.F., Mandle, L., Hamel, P., Wilson, K.A., Yetka, K., Possingham, H.P., Rhodes, J.R., Incorporating climate change into ecosystem service assessments and decisions: a review. Glob. Change Biol., 2016, 10.1111/gcb.13457.
39. Sample, J.E., Baber, I., Badger, R., A spatially distributed risk screening tool to assess climate and land use change impacts on water-related ecosystem services. Environ. Modell. Software 83 (2016), 12–26.
40. Schirpke, U., Kohler, M., Leitinger, G., Fontana, V., Tasser, E., Tappeiner, U., Future impacts of changing land use and climate on ecosystem services of mountain grassland and their resilience. Ecosyst. Serv. 26 (2017), 79–94.
41. Sharp, R., Tallis, H.T., Ricketts, T., Guerry, A.D., Wood, S.A., Chaplin-Kramer, R., et al. InVEST +VERSION+ User's Guide. 2016, The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund.
42. Singh, S.P., Thadani, R., Complexities and controversies in Himalayan research: A call for collaboration and rigor for better data. Mt. Res. Dev. 35 (2015), 401–409.
43. Song, W., Deng, X.Z., Yuan, Y.W., Wang, Z., Li, Z.H., Impacts of land use change on valued ecosystem service in rapidly urbanized North China Plain. Ecol. Model. 318 (2015), 245–253.
44. Stubbington, R., Chadd, R., Cid, N., Csabai, Z., Miliša, M., Morais, M., Munné, A., Pařil, P., Pešić, V., Tziortzis, I., Verdonschot, R.C.M., Datry, T., Biomonitoring of intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams in Europe: current practice and priorities to enhance ecological status assessments. Sci. Total Environ. 618 (2018), 1096–1113.
45. Stubbington, R., England, J., Wood, P.J., Sefton, C.E.M., Temporary streams in temperate zones: recognizing, monitoring and restoring transitional aquatic-terrestrial ecosystems. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Water, 4, 2017, e1223.
46. TEEB, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity in local and regional policy and management. 2012, Earthscan, London and Washington.
47. United Nations (2015) Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/70/1.
48. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Promoting Technology Innovation for Clean and Safe Water – Water Technology Innovation Blueprint: Version 2 (EPA 820-R-14-006). April, 2014.
49. Vigerstol, K.L., Aukema, J.E., A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services. J. Environ. Manage. 92 (2011), 2403–2409.
50. Verburg, P.H., Simulating feedback in land use and land cover change models. Landscape Ecol. 21 (2006), 1171–1183.
51. Wu, D.H., Zhao, X., Liang, S., Zhou, T., Huang, K., Tang, B., Zhao, W., Time-lag effects of global vegetation responses to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 21 (2015), 3520–3531.
52. Zank, B., Bagstad, K.J., Voigt, B., Villa, F., Modeling the effects of urban expansion on natural capital stocks and ecosystem service flows: a case study in the Puget Sound, Washington, USA. Landscape Urban Plann. 149 (2016), 31–42.
53. Zilio, M.I., Alfonso, M.B., Ferrelli, F., Perillo, G.M.E., Piccolo, M.C., Ecosystem services provision, tourism and climate variability in shallow lakes: the case of La Salada, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Tourism Manage. 62 (2017), 208–217.