Assessing impact of land use and climate change on regulating ecosystem services in the czech republic

Ecosystem Health and Sustainability

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Krkoška lorencová, Eliška ^a   Harmáčková, Zuzana V ^a,b   Landová, Lucie ^b   Pártl, Adam ^a,b   Vačkář, David ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Czech Republic; drivers; ecosystem services; InVEST; modeling; scenarios; Special Feature: Ecosystem Management in Transition in Central and Eastern Europe

Indexed keywords

EID: 85061623962     PISSN: 20964129     EISSN: 23328878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ehs2.1210     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Anderson, D. M., P. M., Glibert, and J. M., Burkholder. 2002. Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: nutrient sources, composition, and consequences. Estuaries 25:704–726.
2. Arkema, K. K., G., Guannel, G., Verutes, S. A., Wood, A., Guerry, M., Ruckelshaus, P., Kareiva, M., Lacayo, and J. M., Silver. 2013. Coastal habitats shield people and property from sea‐level rise and storms. Nature Climate Change 3:913–918.
3. Bagstad, K. J., D. J., Semmens, and R., Winthrop. 2013. Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: a case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona. Ecosystem Services 5:40–50.
4. Bennett, E. M., G. D., Peterson, and L. J., Gordon. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters 12:1394–1404.
5. Bicík, I., L., Jelecek and V., Štepánek. 2001. Land‐use changes and their social driving forces in Czechia in the 19th and 20th centuries. Land Use Policy 18:65–73.
6. Bicík, I., L., Kupková, L., Jelecek, J., Kabrda, P., Štych, Z., Janoušek and J., Winklerová. 2015. Land—the Czech Republic 1845–2010: Socio‐economic driving forces. Springer, Switzerland 215 pp.
7. Bossard, M., J., Feranec and J., Otahel. 2000. Corine land cover technical guide—Addendum 2000. EEA Technical report No 40. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen, 105 pp.
8. Butler, J. R. A., G. Y., Wong, D. J., Metcalfe, M., Honzák, P. L., Pert, N., Rao van, M. E., Grieken, T., Lawson, C., Bruce, F. J., Kroon, and J. E., Brodie. 2013. An analysis of trade‐offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 180:176–191.
9. Camargo, J. A., and A., Alonso. 2006. Ecological and toxicological effects on inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: a global assessment. Environment International 32:831–849.
10. Cardinale, B. J., et al., 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59–67.
11. Conte, M., E., Nelson, K., Carney, C., Fissore, O., Nasser, A. J., Plantinga, B., Stanley, and T., Ricketts. 2011. Terrestrial carbon sequestration and storage. Pages 111–128 in P., Kareiva, H., Tallis, T. H., Ricketts, G. C., Daily and S., Polasky, editors. Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, New York.
12. Costanza, R., 2008. Ecosystems services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation 141:350–352.
13. CzechTerra, Inventorying of landscape—CzechTerra [in Czech], 2010. Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic, Prague, 107 pp. http://www.czechterra.cz/documents/CzechTerra_Zprava_20101111.pdf.
14. Daily, G. C., S., Polasky, J., Goldstein, P. M., Kareiva, H., Mooney, L., Pejchar, T. H., Ricketts, J., Salzman, and R., Shallenberger. 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7:21–28.
15. Chazal De, J., F., Quetier, S., Lavorel van, and A., Doorn. 2008. Including multiple differing stakeholder values into vulnerability assessments of socio‐ecological systems. Global Environmental Change: Part A—Human and Policy Dimensions 18:508–520.
16. De Groot, R. S., M. A., Wilson, and R. M. J., Boumans. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41:393–408.
17. EEA. 2006. Land Accounts for Europe 1990‐2000—Towards integrated land and ecosystem accounting. EEA Report 11/2006. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
18. EEA. 2010. The European environment–State and outlook 2010: synthesis. State of the environment report. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
19. EEA. 2012. Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2012—an indicator‐based report. EEA Report No 12/2012, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
20. EEA. 2015. The European environment—State and outlook 2015: European briefings ‐ Biodiversity. State of the environment report. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
21. ESDB. 2004. The European Soil Database: distribution version 2.0, European Commission and the European Soil Bureau Network, CD‐ROM, EUR 19945 EN.
22. Foley, J. A., et al., 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574.
23. Freibauer, A., M. D. A., Rounsevell, P., Smith, and J., Verhagen. 2004. Carbon sequestration in the agricultural soils of Europe. Geoderma 122:1–23.
24. Frélichová, J., D., Vačkář, A., Pártl, B., Loučková, Z. V., Harmáčková, and E., Lorencová. 2014. Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Ecosystem Services 8:110–117.
25. Fronzek, S., T. R., Carter, and K., Jylhä. 2012. Representing two centuries of past and future climate for assessing risks to biodiversity in Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21:19–35.
26. Goldstein, J. H., G., Caldarone, T. K., Duarte, D., Ennaanay, N., Hannahs, G., Mendoza, S., Polasky, S., Wolny, and G. C., Daily. 2012. Integrating ecosystem‐service tradeoffs into land‐use decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109:7565–7570.
27. Haines‐young, R., and M., Potschin. 2013. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August‐December 2012.
28. Harmáčková, Z. V., and D., Vačkář. 2015. Modelling regulating ecosystem services trade‐offs across landscape scenarios in Třeboňsko Wetlands Biosphere Reserve, Czech Republic. Ecological Modelling 295:207–215.
29. Harmácková, Z. V., E., Krkoška lorencová, and D., Vackár. 2016. Ecosystem‐based adaptation and disaster risk reduction: costs and benefits of participatory ecosystem services scenarios for Šumava National Park, Czech Republic. The role of ecosystems in disaster risk reduction II, in press.
30. Hönigová, I., D., Vackár, E., Lorencová, J., Melichar, M., Götzl, G., Sonderegger, V., Oušková, M., Hošek and K., Chobot. 2012. Survey on grassland ecosystem services, report to the european topic centre on biological diversity, 78 pp. Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Prague.
31. Johnson, K. A., S., Polasky, E., Nelson and D., Pennington. 2012. Uncertainty in ecosystem services valuation and implications for assessing land use tradeoffs: an agricultural case study in the Minnesota River Basin. Ecological Economics 79:71–79.
32. Kareiva, P., H., Tallis, T. H., Ricketts, G. C., Daily, and S., Polasky, editors. 2011. Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services, 392 pp. Oxford University Press, New York.
33. Koch, E. W., et al., 2009. Non‐linearity in ecosystem services: temporal and spatial variability in coastal protection. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(1):29–37.
34. Lal, R., 2008. Carbon sequestration. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological sciences 363:815–830.
35. LEAC. 2014. Land accounts data viewer 1990, 2000, 2006. European Environment Agency. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/data-viewers/land-accounts.
36. Lorencová, E., J., Frelichová, E., Nelson, and D., Vačkář. 2013. Past and future impacts of land use and climate change on agricultural ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy 33:183–194.
37. MA. 2003. Dealing with scale. Ecosystems and human well‐being: a conceptual framework. Millennium ecosystem assessment. Pages 107–126. Island Press, Washington, DC.
38. MA. 2005. Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis, 160 pp. Island Press, Washington, DC.
39. Maes, J., et al., 2012. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services 1:31–39.
40. Musil, P., J., Pykal and J., Janda. 1996. Sustainable use of fishponds in the Trebonsko Protected Landscape Area and Biosphere Reserve. Czech IUCN Coordination Unit, IUCN, Gland, Cambridge, 89 pp.
41. Nelson, E., et al., 2006. Anthropogenic drivers of ecosystem change: an overview. Ecology and Society 11:29.
42. Nelson, E., et al., 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7:4–11.
43. Nelson, E., H., Sander, P., Hawthorne, M., Conte, S., Ennaanay, S. Manson., Wolny, and S., Polasky. 2010. Projecting global land‐use change and its effect on ecosystem service provision and biodiversity with simple models. PLoS ONE 5:e14327.
44. Nemec, K. T., and C., Raudsepp‐hearne. 2012. The use of geographic information systems to map and assess ecosystem services. Biodiversity and Conservation 22:1–15.
45. NIR. 2012. National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of the Czech Republic (reported inventories 1990–2010), 347 pp. National Inventory system. http://portal.chmi.cz/files/portal/docs/uoco/oez/nis/NIR/CZE-NIR-2012-UNFCCC_resubmission_final.pdf.
46. Panagos, P., M., Van Liedekerke, A., Jones, and L., Montanarella. 2012. European soil data centre: response to European policy support and public data requirements. Land Use Policy 29:329–338.
47. Parmesan, C., and G., Yohe. 2003. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42.
48. Pithart, D., K., Křováková, J., Žaloudík, T., Dostál, J., Valentová, P., Valenta, J., Weyskrabová, and J., Dušek. 2010. Ecosystem services of natural floodplain segment—Lužnice River, Czech Republic. Pages 129–139 in D., de Wrachien, D., Proverbs, C. A., Brebbia and S., Mambretti, editors. Flood recovery, innovation and response II. WIT Press, Southampton.
49. Raskin, P. D., 2005. Global scenarios: background review for the millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems 8:133–142.
50. Reckhow, K. H., M. N., Beaulac, and J. T., Simpson. 1980. Modeling Phosphorus loading and lake response under uncertainty: a manual and compilation of export coefficients, 224 pp. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
51. Rounsevell, M. D. A., et al., 2006. A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 114:57–68.
52. Rounsevell, M. D. A., et al., 2012. Challenges for land system science. Land Use Policy 29:899–910.
53. Scholes, R. J., B., Reyers, R., Biggs, M. J., Spierenburg, and A., Duriappah. 2013. Multi‐scale and cross‐scale assessments of social–ecological systems and their ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5:16–25.
54. Schulp, C. J. E., G.‐J., Nabuurs, and P. H., Verburg. 2008. Future carbon sequestration in Europe—Effects of land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 127:251–264.
55. Schulp, C. J. E., B., Burkhard, J., Maes, J., Van Vliet, and P. H., Verburg. 2014. Uncertainties in ecosystem service maps: A comparison on the European scale. PLoS ONE 9:e109643.
56. Spangenberg, J. H., 2007. Integrated scenarios for assessing biodiversity risks. Sustainable Development 15:343–356.
57. Spangenberg, J. H., et al., 2012. Scenarios for investigating risks to biodiversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21:5–18.
58. Tallis, H. T., et al., 2011. InVEST 2.4.4 User's Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford.
59. TEEB. 2010. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations, 456 pp. Earthscan, London and Washington.
60. UK, NEA (UK National Ecosystem Assessment). 2011. The UK national ecosystem assessment: synthesis of the key findings, 1466 pp. UNEP‐WCMC, Cambridge.
61. Verburg, P. H., 2006. Simulating feedback in land use and land cover change models. Landscape Ecology 21:1171–1183.
62. Verburg, P. H., J. R. R., van Eck, T., de Nijs, P., Schot, and M., Dijst. 2004. Determinants of land use change patterns in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B 31:125–150.
63. Vigerstol, K. L., and J. E., Aukema. 2011. A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management 92:2403–2409.
64. Wallace, K., 2007. Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biological Conservation 139:235–246.
65. Weber, J. L., 2007. Implementation of land and ecosystem accounts at the European Environment Agency. Ecological Economics 61:695–707.