Applying ecosystem services indicators in landscape planning and management: The ES-in-Planning framework

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 61, Issue , 2016, Pages 100-113

  Albert, Christian ^a,b   Galler, Carolin ^a   Hermes, Johannes ^a   Neuendorf, Felix ^a   Von Haaren, Christina ^a   Lovett, Andrew ^c  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^b HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Decision support; DPSIR; Ecosystem functions; Ecosystem services; Indicators; Landscape; Landscape planning

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ECOLOGY; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; INDICATORS (INSTRUMENTS);

DECISION SUPPORTS; DPSIR; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LANDSCAPE; LANDSCAPE PLANNING;

ECOSYSTEMS;

BIODIVERSITY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ESTHETICS; FOOD PRODUCTION; JOINT IMPLEMENTATION; LANDSCAPE; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; PLANNING PROCESS; TRADE-OFF;

GERMANY;

EID: 84928037133     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.029     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. C. Albert, J. Aronson, C. Fürst, and P. Opdam Integrating ecosystem services in landscape planning: requirements, approaches, and impacts Landsc. Ecol. 29 2014 1277 1285
2. C. Albert, J. Hauck, N. Buhr, and C. von Haaren What ecosystem services information do users want? Investigating interests and requirements among landscape and regional planners in Germany Landsc. Ecol. 29 2014 1301 1313
3. Albert, C., Burkhard, B., Daube, S., Dietrich, K., Engels, B., Frommer, J., Götzl, M., Grêt-Regamey, A., Job-Hoben, B., Keller, R., Marzelli, S., Moning, C., Müller, F., Rabe,S.-E., Ring, I., Schwaiger, E., Schweppe-Kraft, B., Wüstemann, H., in press. Dis-cussion Paper - Development of National Indicators for Ecosystem Services - Recommendations for Germany. Bundesamt für Naturschutz Bonn.
4. O. Bastian, and K.-F. Schreiber Analyse und Ökologische Bewertung der Landschaft 1994 Gustav Fischer Jena, Stuttgart
5. E. Bierhals, O. von Drachenfels, and M. Rasper Wertstufen und Regenerationsfähigkeit der Biotoptypen in Niedersachsen Informationsdienst Naturschutz Niedersachsen 24 2004 231 240
6. B. Bredemeier, C. von Haaren, S. Rüter, M. Reich, and T. Meise Evaluating the nature conservation value of field habitats: a model approach for targeting agri-environmental measures and projecting their effects Ecol. Modell. 2014 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.010
7. B. Burkhard, M. Kandziora, Y. Hou, and F. Müller Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demand - concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification Landscape Online 34 2014 1 32
8. I. Casado-Arzuaga, M. Onaindia, I. Madariaga, and P. Verburg Mapping recreation and aesthetic value of ecosystems in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt (northern Spain) to support landscape planning Landsc. Ecol. 29 2014 1393 1405
9. R.M. Cowling, B. Egoh, A.T. Knight, P.J. O'Farrell, B. Reyers, M. Rouget, D.J. Roux, A. Welz, and A. Wilhelm-Rechman An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 2008 9483
10. G.C. Daily, S. Polasky, J. Goldstein, P.M. Kareiva, H.A. Mooney, L. Pejchar, T.H. Ricketts, J. Salzman, and R. Shallenberger Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver Front. Ecol. Environ. 7 2009 21 28
11. R. de Groot, B. Fisher, M. Christie, J. Aronson, L. Braat, R. Haines-Young, J. Gowdy, E. Maltby, A. Neuville, and S. Polasky Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation P. Kumar, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations 2010 Earthscan London 9 40
12. R.S. de Groot, R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein, and L. Willemen Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making Ecol. Complex. 7 2010 260 272
13. S. Frank, C. Fürst, A. Witt, L. Koschke, and F. Makeschin Making use of the ecosystem services concept in regional planning - trade-offs from reducing water erosion Landsc. Ecol. 29 2014 1377 1391
14. C. Fürst, P. Opdam, L. Inostroza, and S. Luque Evaluating the role of ecosystem services in participatory land use planning: proposing a balanced score card Landsc. Ecol. 29 2014 1435 1446
15. C. Galler, C. Albert, and C. von Haaren From regional environmental planning to implementation: paths and challenges of integrating ecosystem services Ecosyst. Serv. 2015 (in review)
16. German Federal Environmental Agency, 2008. Economic valuation of environmental damage: metodological convention for estimates of environmental externalities. Dessau-Roßlau.
17. D. German Federal Environmental Agency, Economic valuation of environmental damage: metodological convention for estimates of environmental externalities. 2008, Dessau-Roßlau.Gruehn Zur Validität von Bewertungsmethoden in der Landschafts- und Umweltplanung. Handlungsbedarf, methodisches Vorgehen und Konsequenzen für die Planungspraxis, aufgezeigt am Beispiel der Validitätsprüfung praxistauglicher Verfahrensansätze zur Bewertung von boden-, wasser- und klimarelevanten Landschaftsfunktionen 2005 Berlin Mensch & Buch Verlag
18. R. Haines-Young, and M. Potschin The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being D.G. Raffaelli, C.L.J. Frid, Ecosystem Ecology - A New Synthesis 2010 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 110 139
19. R. Haines-Young, and M. Potschin Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003 2013 Download at www.cices.eu and spread sheet
20. D. Hatton MacDonald, R. Bark, and A. Coggan Is ecosystem service research used by decision-makers? A case study of the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia Landsc. Ecol. 2014 10.1007/s10980-10014-10021-10983
21. J. Hauck, C. Görg, R. Varjopuro, O. Ratamäki, J. Maes, H. Wittmer, and K. Jax Maps have an air of authority: potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making Ecosyst. Serv. 4 2013 25 32
22. J. Hauck, B. Schweppe-Kraft, C. Albert, C. Görg, K. Jax, R. Jensen, C. Fürst, J. Maes, I. Ring, I. Hönigová, B. Burkhard, M. Mehring, M. Tiefenbach, K. Grunewald, M. Schwarzer, J. Meurer, M. Sommerhäuser, J.A. Priess, J. Schmidt, and A. Grêt-Regamey The promise of the ecosystem services concept for planning and decision-making GAIA: Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 22 2013 232 236
23. K. Helming, K. Diehl, D. Geneletti, and H. Wiggering Mainstreaming ecosystem services in European policy impact assessment Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 40 2013 82 87
24. B. Jessel, and K. Tobias Ökologisch orientierte Planung: Eine Einführung in Theorien, Daten und Methoden 2002 Ulmer Stuttgart
25. M. Kandziora, B. Burkhard, and F. Müller Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators - a theoretical matrix exercise Ecol. Indic. 28 2013 54 78
26. S. Kato, and J. Ahern 'Learning by doing': adaptive planning as a strategy to address uncertainty in planning J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 51 2008 543 559
27. B. Köhler, and A. Preiß Erfassung und Bewertung des Landschaftsbildes: Grundlagen und Methoden zur Bearbeitung des Schutzguts Vielfalt, Eigenart und Schoenheit von Natur und Landschaft in der Planung 2000 Informationsdienst Naturschutz Niedersachsen 20
28. L. Kopperoinen, P. Itkonen, and J. Niemelä Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: an insight into a new place-based methodology Landsc. Ecol. 29 2014 1361 1375
29. J. Liu, and P. Opdam Valuing ecosystem services in community-based landscape planning: introducing a wellbeing-based approach Landsc. Ecol. 29 2014 1347 1360
30. J. Maes, B. Egoh, L. Willemen, C. Liquete, P. Vihervaara, J.P. Schägner, B. Grizzetti, E.G. Drakou, A.L. Notte, G. Zulian, F. Bouraoui, M. Luisa Paracchini, L. Braat, and G. Bidoglio Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union Ecosyst. Serv. 1 2012 31 39
31. A. Mascarenhas, T. Ramos, D. Haase, and R. Santos Integration of ecosystem services in spatial planning: a survey on regional planners' views Landsc. Ecol. 2014 10.1007/s10980-10014-10012-10984
32. A. Mengel Kommentierung § 1 BNatSchG (Ziele des Naturschutzes und der Landschaftspflege) W. Frenz, H.-J. Müggenborg, Berliner Kommentar zum Bundesnaturschutzgesetz 2011 Erich Schmidt Verlag Berlin
33. F. Müller, and B. Burkhard The indicator side of ecosystem services Ecosyst. Serv. 1 2012 26 30
34. D. Niemeijer, and R.S. de Groot A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets Ecol. Indic. 8 2008 14 25
35. P. Opdam, C. Albert, C. Fürst, A. Grêt-Regamey, J. Kleemann, D. Parker, D. La Rosa, K. Schmidt, G.B. Villamor, and A. Walz Ecosystem services for connecting actors - lessons from a symposium CASES 2015 (in press)
36. I. Palacios-Agundez, B. Fernández de Manuel, G. Rodríguez-Loinaz, L. Peña, I. Ametzaga-Arregi, J. Alday, I. Casado-Arzuaga, I. Madariaga, X. Arana, and M. Onaindia Integrating stakeholders' demands and scientific knowledge on ecosystem services in landscape planning Landsc. Ecol. 2014 10.1007/s10980-10014-19994-10981
37. M.B. Potschin, and R.H. Haines-Young Ecosystem services - exploring a geographical perspective Progr. Phys. Geogr. 35 2011 575 594
38. Region Hannover Landschaftsrahmenplan der Region Hannover 2013
39. 2O emissions in Lower Saxony and comparison of implementation potentials for mitigation measures in Germany and England Regional Environ. Change 13 2013 825 841
40. B. Schößer, K. Helming, and H. Wiggering Assessing land use change impacts - a comparison of the SENSOR land use function approach with other frameworks J. Land Use Sci. 5 2010 159 178
41. E. Smeets, and R. Weterings Environmental Indicators: Typology and Overview. Technical Report No. 25 1999 EEA Copenhagen
42. J.H. Spangenberg, J.M. Douguet, J. Settele, and K.L. Heong Escaping the lock-in of continuous insecticide spraying in rice: developing an integrated ecological and socio-political DPSIR analysis Ecol. Modell. 2014 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.05.010
43. F. Steiner The living Landscape: An Ecological Approach to Landscape Planning 2nd ed. 2000 McGraw-Hill New York
44. C. Steinitz A framework for theory and practice in landscape planning GIS Europe 2 1993 42 45
45. TEEB P. Kumar, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations 2010 Earthscan London and Washington, DC
46. K. Tscherning, K. Helming, B. Krippner, S. Sieber, and S.G.y. Paloma Does research applying the DPSIR framework support decision making? Land Use Policy 29 2012 102 110
47. UK NEA The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings 2011 UNEP-WCMC Cambridge
48. A.P.E. van Oudenhoven, K. Petz, R. Alkemade, L. Hein, and R.S. de Groot Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services Ecol. Indic. 21 2012 110 122
49. C. von Haaren Landschaftsplanung 2004 Eugen Ulmer Stuttgart 527 529
50. C. von Haaren, C. Albert, J. Barkmann, R. de Groot, J. Spangenberg, C. Schröter-Schlaack, and B. Hansjürgens From explanation to application: introducing a practice-oriented ecosystem services evaluation (PRESET) model adapted to the context of landscape planning and management Landsc. Ecol. 29 2014 1335 1346
51. C. von Haaren, C. Galler, and S. Ott Landscape Planning. The Basis of Sustainable Landscape Development 2008 Bundesamt für Naturschutz Bonn