Otyper: A neural architecture for open named entity typing

32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2018

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 6037-6044

  Yuan, Zheng ^a   Downey, Doug ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE;

CO-REFERENCE RESOLUTIONS; COARSE-GRAINED; KNOWLEDGE BASE; NAMED ENTITIES; NEURAL ARCHITECTURES; QUESTION ANSWERING; RELATION EXTRACTION; TARGET TYPE;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 85060461185     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Abdul-Hamid, A., and Darwish, K. 2010. Simplified feature set for arabic named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the 2010 Named Entities Workshop, 110-115. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Carreras, X.; Marquez, L.; and Padró, L. 2002. Named entity extraction using adaboost. In proceedings of the 6th conference on Natural language learning-Volume 20, 1-4. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. Chang, M.-W.; Ratinov, L.-A.; Roth, D.; and Srikumar, V. 2008. Importance of semantic representation: Dataless classification. In AAAI, volume 2, 830-835.
4. Chinchor, N., and Robinson, P. 1997. Muc-7 named entity task definition. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Message Understanding, volume 29.
5. Collins, M., and Singer, Y. 1999. Unsupervised models for named entity classification. In Proceedings of the joint SIG-DAT conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and very large corpora, 100-110.
6. Elsner, M.; Charniak, E.; and Johnson, M. 2009. Structured generative models for unsupervised named-entity clustering. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 164-172. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Graves, A. 2012. Supervised sequence labelling. Supervised sequence labelling with recurrent neural networks 5-13.
8. Grishman, R., and Sundheim, B. 1996. Message understanding conference-6: A brief history. In COLING 1996 Volume 1: The 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, volume 1.
9. Hearst, M. A. 1992. Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 2, 539-545. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. Huang, L.; May, J.; Pan, X.; and Ji, H. 2016. Building a fine-grained entity typing system overnight for a new x (x= language, domain, genre). arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.03112.
11. Huang, L.; May, J.; Pan, X.; Ji, H.; Ren, X.; Han, J.; Zhao, L.; and Hendler, J. A. 2017. Liberal entity extraction: Rapid construction of fine-grained entity typing systems. Big Data 5(1):19-31.
12. Jimeno-Yepes, A. J.; McInnes, B. T.; and Aronson, A. R. 2011. Exploiting mesh indexing in medline to generate a data set for word sense disambiguation. BMC bioinformatics 12(1):223.
13. Kingma, D., and Ba, J. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.
14. Kuru, O.; Can, O. A.; and Yuret, D. 2016. Charner: Character-level named entity recognition. In COLING, 911-921.
15. Lee, C.; Hwang, Y.-G.; Oh, H.-J.; Lim, S.; Heo, J.; Lee, C.H.; Kim, H.-J.; Wang, J.-H.; and Jang, M.-G. 2006. Fine-grained named entity recognition using conditional random fields for question answering. In AIRS, 581-587. Springer.
16. Ling, X., and Weld, D. S. 2012. Fine-grained entity recognition. In AAAI.
17. Mikolov, T.; Yih, W.-t.; and Zweig, G. 2013. Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations. In hlt-Naacl, volume 13, 746-751.
18. Palatucci, M.; Pomerleau, D.; Hinton, G. E.; and Mitchell, T. M. 2009. Zero-shot learning with semantic output codes. In Advances in neural information processing systems, 1410-1418.
19. Pennington, J.; Socher, R.; and Manning, C. D. 2014. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In EMNLP, volume 14, 1532-1543.
20. Rabinovich, M., and Klein, D. 2017. Fine-grained entity typing with high-multiplicity assignments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.07751.
21. Ratinov, L., and Roth, D. 2009. Design challenges and misconceptions in named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, 147-155. for Computational Linguistics.
22. Ritter, A.; Clark, S.; Etzioni, O.; et al. 2011. Named entity recognition in tweets: an experimental study. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1524-1534. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. Ritter, A.; Soderland, S.; and Etzioni, O. 2009. What is this, anyway: Automatic hypernym discovery. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Learning by Reading and Learning to Read, 88-93.
24. Sang, E. T. K. 2007. Extracting hypernym pairs from the web. In Proceedings of the 45th annual meeting of the ACL on interactive poster and demonstration sessions, 165-168. Association for Computational Linguistics.
25. Seitner, J.; Bizer, C.; Eckert, K.; Faralli, S.; Meusel, R.; Paulheim, H.; and Ponzetto, S. P. 2016. A large database of hypernymy relations extracted from the web. In LREC.
26. Shimaoka, S.; Stenetorp, P.; Inui, K.; and Riedel, S. 2016a. An attentive neural architecture for fine-grained entity type classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.05525.
27. Shimaoka, S.; Stenetorp, P.; Inui, K.; and Riedel, S. 2016b. Neural architectures for fine-grained entity type classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01341.
28. Snow, R.; Jurafsky, D.; and Ng, A. Y. 2005. Learning syntactic patterns for automatic hypernym discovery. In Advances in neural information processing systems, 1297-1304.
29. Socher, R.; Ganjoo, M.; Manning, C. D.; and Ng, A. 2013. Zero-shot learning through cross-modal transfer. In Advances in neural information processing systems, 935-943.
30. Tjong Kim Sang, E. F., and De Meulder, F. 2003. Introduction to the conll-2003 shared task: Language-independent named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the seventh conference on Natural language learning at HLT-NAACL 2003-Volume 4, 142-147. Association for Computational Linguistics.
31. Yao, L.; Riedel, S.; and McCallum, A. 2013. Universal schema for entity type prediction. In Proceedings of the 2013 workshop on Automated knowledge base construction, 79-84. ACM.
32. Yogatama, D.; Gillick, D.; and Lazic, N. 2015. Embedding methods for fine grained entity type classification. In ACL (2), 291-296.