Modern realist theory and the study of international politics in the twenty-first century

Millennial Reflections on International Studies

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 65-78

  Grieco, Joseph M ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85059563102     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (101)

1. Quincy Wright, The Causes of War and the Conditions of Peace (London: Longmans, Green, 1935).
2. Hans Morgenthau, Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 4th ed. (New York: Knopf, 1973, first published 1948).
3. Edward H. Carr, The Twenty Years Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (London: Macmillan, 1939).
4. Nicholas J. Spykman, America’s Strategy in World Politics: The United States and the Balance of Power (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1941).
5. Raymond Aron, Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations, trans. Richard Howard and Annette Baker Fox (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1966).
6. Robert Gilpin, “The Politics of Transnational Rela tions”, in Transnational Relations and World Politics, ed. Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye Jr. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972), 48-69.
7. Robert Gilpin, U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment (New York: Basic Books, 1975).
8. Robert Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).
9. Robert Gilpin, The Political Economy of International Relations(Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1987).
10. Kenneth N. Waltz, Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959).
11. Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979).
12. Kenneth N. Waltz, “Structural Realism after the Cold War”, International Security 25 (summer 2000): 41.
13. Arthur A. Stein, “Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World”, in International Regimes, ed. Stephen D. Krasner (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1983), 115-40.
14. Robert M. Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books, 1984).
15. Robert O. Keohane, “The Demand for International Regimes”, in Krasner, International Regimes, 141-71.
16. Robert O. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984).
17. David A. Baldwin, ed., Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).
18. John G. Ruggie, “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order”, in Krasner, International Regimes, 195-231.
19. Friedrich Kratochwil and John G. Ruggie, “International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State”, International Organization 40 (autumn 1986): 753-75.
20. Jeffrey W. Legro, Cooperation under Fire: Anglo-German Restraint during World War II (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1995).
21. Jeffrey W. Legro, “Whence American Internationalism”, International Organization 54 (spring 2000): 253-89.
22. Peter J. Katzenstein, ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996).
23. Martha Finnemore, National Interests in International Society (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1996).
24. Margaret Keck and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1998).
25. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995.
26. Alastair Iain Johnston, “Cultural Realism and Strategy in Maoist China”, in Katzenstein, The Culture of National Security; Alastair Iain Johnston, “Realism(s) and Chinese Security Policy in the Post-Cold War Period”, in Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies after the Cold War, ed. Ethan B. Kapstein and Michael Mastanduno (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999), 261-318.
27. John Oneal and Bruce Russett, “Assessing the Liberal Peace with Alternative Specifications: Trade Still Reduces Conflict”, Journal of Peace Research 36 [July 1999], 423-42.
28. Waltz, and Katherine Barbieri, “International Trade and Conflict: The Debatable Paul A. Papayoanou, “Interdependence, Institutions, and the Balance of Power”, International Security 20 (spring 1996): 42-76.
29. Christopher Gelpi and Joseph M. Grieco, “Democracy, Interdependence, and the Liberal Peace” (Duke University, March 31,2000, unpublished).
30. Richard Rosecrance, The Rise of the Virtual State: Wealth and Power in the Coming Century (New York: Basic Books, 1999).
31. Norman Angell, The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National Advantage, 4th ed. (New York: Putnam, first published 1913).
32. Robert Jervis, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1976)
33. Irving L. Janis, Groupthink, 2d ed. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1980).
34. Richard N. Lebow, Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crises (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981).
35. Robert Jervis, Richard Ned Lebow, and Janice Gross Stein, Psychology and Deterrence (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985).
36. Mercer. Jonathan Mercer, “Anarchy and Identity,” International Organization 49 (spring 1995): 229-52.
37. Other key works on the impact of different levels of domestic politics on foreign policy that emphasize the manner in which domestic dynamics may propel states to go in directions not anticipated by a focus solely on their systemic position would include Jack Snyder, Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991).
38. Charles Kupchan, The Vulnerability of Empire (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1994).
39. Otto Hintze, “The Formation of States and Constitutional Development” and “Military Organization and the Organization of the State,” both in The Historical Essays of Otto Hintze, ed. Felix Gilbert (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975), 157-215.
40. Charles Tilly, Coercion, Capital, and European States, a.d. 900-1990 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).
41. Theda Skocpol, “A Critical Review of Barrington Moore’s Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy”, American Journal of Sociology 4 (fall 1973): 1-34.
42. Aristide Zolberg, “Strategic Interactions and the Formation of Modern States: France and England”, International Social Science Journal 32, no. 4 (1980): 687-716.
43. Barry Posen, “Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power”, International Security 18 (autumn 1993): 80-124.
44. Peter J. Katzenstein, “United Germany in an Integrating Europe”, in Tamed Power: Germany in Europe, ed. Peter J. Katzenstein (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1997), 3.
45. “EU Strikes Reform Deal after Marathon”, BBC Online, December 11, 2000, http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/europe/newsid_1065000/1065192.stm.
46. Thomas V. Berger, “Norms, Identity, and National Security in Germany and Japan”, in The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, ed. Peter J. Katzenstein (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), 312-56.
47. John A. Vasquez, “The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz’s Balancing Proposition”, American Political Science Review 91 (December 1997): 899-912.
48. Joseph M. Grieco, Cooperation among Nations: Europe, America, and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1990)
49. M. S. Niou and Peter C. Ordeshook, “Less Filling, Tastes Great: The Realist-Neoliberal Debate”, World Politics 46 (January 1994): 209-34.
50. Posen, “Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power”; and Stephen Walt, Revolution and War (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1996).
51. Gilpin, U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation; Stephen D. Krasner, “State Power and the Structure of International Trade”, World Politics 28 (April 1976): 317-47.
52. David A. Lake, Power, Protection, and Free Trade: International Sources of U.S. Commercial Strategy, 1887-1939 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1987).
53. Brian M. Pollins, “Does Trade Still Follow the Flag?” American Political Science Review 83 (June 1989): 465-80.
54. Joanne S. Gowa, Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994).
55. Edward D. Mansfield and Rachel Bronson, “Alliances, Preferential Trading Arrangements, and International Trade”, American Political Science Review 91 (March 1997): 94-107.
56. Peter D. Feaver, “Brother, Can You Spare a Paradigm? (Or Was Anyone Ever a Realist?)”, correspondence section of International Security 25 (summer 2000): 165-69.
57. Arnold Wolfers, Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962), 81-102.
58. Waltz, Theory of International Politics.
59. Grieco, Cooperation among Nations. Wolfers, Discord and Collaboration, especially 85-88.
60. John J. Mearsheimer, “The False Promise of International Institutions”, International Security 19 (winter 1995-96): 11.
61. Fareed Zakaria, “Realism and Domestic Politics: A Review Essay”, International Security 17 (summer 1992): 177-98.
62. Randall Schweller, “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back”, International Security 19 (summer 1994): 72-107.
63. Mansfield and Bronson, “Alliances, Preferential Trading Arrangements, and International Trade”, 100, 103.
64. D. Scott Bennett and Allan C. Stam, “Research Design and Estimator Choices in the Analysis of Interstate Dyads: When Decisions Matter”, Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (October 2000): 667.
65. Russett and Oneal, Lisa Martin, Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1992)
66. Lisa Martin and Beth Simmons, “Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions”, International Organization 52 (autumn 1998): 729-57.
67. Randall L. Schweller and David Priess, “A Tale of Two Realisms: Explaining the Institutions Debate”, Mershon International Studies Review, 41 (May 1992): 1-32.
68. G. John Ikenberry, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000).
69. Joseph M. Grieco, “The Maastricht Treaty, Economic and Monetary Union, and the Neorealist Research Programme”, Review of International Studies 21 (January 1995): 21-40.
70. Joseph M. Grieco, “State Interests and International Rule Trajectories: A Neorealist Interpretation of the Maastricht Treaty and European Economic and Monetary Union”, Security Studies 5 (spring 1996): 176-222.
71. Morgenthau, Politics among Nations, 3d ed., 531-34.
72. Snyder, Myths of Empire; Walt, Revolution and War; Randall Schweller, Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s Strategy of World Conquest (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998).
73. Bruce Bueno de Mesquita and David Lalman, War and Reason: Domestic and International Imperatives (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1992)
74. David L. Rousseau, Christopher Gelpi, Dan Reiter, and Paul K. Huth, “Assessing the Dyadic Nature of the Democratic Peace, 1918-1988”, American Political Science Review 90 (September 1996): 512-33.
75. David A. Lake, “Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War”, American Political Science Review 86 (March 1992): 24-37.
76. Dan Reiter and Allan C. Stam III, “Democracy, War Initiation, and Victory”, American Political Science Review 92 (June 1998): 377-90.
77. Dan Reiter and Allan C. Stam III, “Democracy and Battlefield Military Effectiveness”, Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (June 1998): 259-77.
78. Ajin Choi, “Cooperation for Victory: Democracy, International Partnerships, and War Performance, 1816-1992” (Ph.D. thesis, Duke University, 2001).
79. Kurt T. Gaubatz, “Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations”, International Organization 50 (winter 1996): 109-39.
80. James D. Fearon, “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes”, American Political Science Review 88 (September 1994): 577-92.
81. Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, James D. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson, and Alastair Smith, “Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace”, American Political Science Review 93 (December 1999): 791-807.
82. Hein Goemans, War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000).
83. Johnston, Cultural Realism; Johnston, “Cultural Realism and Strategy in Maoist China”; Johnston, “Realism(s) and Chinese Security in the Post-Cold War Period.”
84. Michael Doyle, “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part I”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (summer 1983): 205-35.
85. Michael Doyle, “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part II”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (fall 1983): 323-53.
86. Michael Doyle, Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism (New York: Norton, 1997).
87. Bruce Russett and Zeev Maoz, “Normative and Structural Causes of the Democratic Peace, 1946-1986”, American Political Science Review 87 (1993): 624-38.
88. Bruce Russett, Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World (Princeton, N.J.: PrincetonUniversity Press, 1993).
89. John Owen, “How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace”, International Security 19 (fall 1994): 87-125.
90. Bueno de Mesquita et al., “Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace”.
91. Christopher Layne, “Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace”, International Security 19 (summer 1994): 5-49.
92. David Spiro, “The Insignificance of the Liberal Peace”, International Security 19 (fall 1994): 50-86.
93. Henry Farber and Joanne Gowa, “Polities and Peace”, International Security 20 (fall 1995): 123-46.
94. Ido Oren, “The Subjectivity of the Democratic Peace”, International Security 20 (fall 1995): 147-84.
95. William Thompson, “Democracy and Peace: Putting the Cart before the Horse?” International Organization 50 (winter 1996): 141-74.
96. Joanne S. Gowa, Ballots and Bullets: The Elusive Democratic Peace (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999).
97. Zeev Maoz, “The Controversy over the Democratic Peace: Rearguard Action or Cracks in the Wall?” International Security 22 (summer 1997): 162-98.
98. John Owen, “Review of Joanne Gowa’s Ballots and Bullets”, American Political Science Review 94 (June 2000): 509-10.
99. Thomas Schwartz, “Review of Joanne Gowa’s Ballots and Bullets”, Comparative Political Studies (June 2000): 690-93.
100. Edward Mansfield and Jack Snyder, “Democratization and the Danger of War”, International Security 20 (summer 1995): 5-38.
101. Gilpin, U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation.