How does it all “turnout”? Exposure to attack advertising, campaign interest, and participation in american presidential elections

Campaign Reform: Insights and Evidence

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 79-105

  Vavreck, Lynn ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85059558675     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Adasiewicz, Christopher, Douglas Rivlin, and Jeffrey Stanger. 1997. Free Television for Presidential Candidates: The 1996 Experiment. Philadelphia: Annen-berg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania.
2. Alliance for Better Campaigns. 1998. Web page available at http://www.better-campaigns.org (accessed September 1).
3. Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.
4. Bartels, Larry M. 1991. “Instrumental and ‘Quasi-Instrumental’ Variables”. American Journal of Political Science 35: 777-800.
5. Boiler, Paul F., Jr. 1996. Presidential Campaigns. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Cain, Bruce. 1998. Remarks at the University of Virginia’s Sorenson Institute for Political Leadership Conference on Campaign Ethics, January 18-21, Charlottesville.
7. Campaign Discourse Mapping Project. 1996. Assessing the Quality of Campaign Discourse: 1960, 1980, 1988, 1992. Philadelphia: Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania.
8. Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
9. Center for Global Ethics. 1998. Web page available at http://www.globalethics.org (accessed September 1).
10. Christ, C. F. 1966. Econometric Models and Methods. New York: Wiley.
11. Finkel, Steven E., and John G. Geer. 1998. “A Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising”. American Journal of Political Science 42: 573-595.
12. Free Air Time and Campaign Reform. 1997. Report of the Conference held by the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania and the Free TV for Straight Talk Coalition. Report 15. Philadelphia: Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania.
13. Geer, John G. 1998. “Campaigns, Competition, and Political Advertising”. In Party Politics and Politicians, ed. John G. Geer. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14. Greene, William H. 1993. Econometric Analysis. 2d ed. New York: Macmillan.
15. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1992. Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Johnson, R. G. 1998. “Negative Campaigners Can Learn from Alabama”. Atlanta Journal and Constitution, July 24, D2.
17. Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard R. Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1948. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. 2d ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
18. Lau, Richard R., Gerald Pomper, and Erlinda Mazeika. 1995. “The Effects of Negative Campaigning”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Political Science Association, Chicago. League of Women Voters. 1998. Web page available at http://www.lwv.org (accessed September 1).
19. Mayer, William G. 1996. “In Defense of Negative Campaigning”. Political Science Quarterly 11: 437-55.
20. McCallister, B. 1998. “Consultants7 Ethics: Politics Survey Finds Attitude of “Don’t Blame Us/” Washington Post, June 18, C2.
21. Patterson, Thomas E. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Knopf.
22. Popkin, Samuel. 1990. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Project on Campaign Conduct. 1998. Web page available at http://www.cam-paignconduct.org (accessed September 1).
24. Putnam, Robert D. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital”. Journal of Democracy 6: 65-78.
25. Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
26. Taylor, Paul. 1996. “Politics in Prime Time: Free TV Airtime for Candidates Is a Partial But Worthwhile Fix”. New Democrat (September-October): 40-41.
27. Thurber, James A., Candice J. Nelson, and David A. Dulio. 1998. “Political Consultants: A Portrait of the Industry”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Assocation, Boston.
28. Vavreck, Lynn. 1997. “More than Minimal Effects: Explaining the Behavior of Clarifying and Insurgent Presidential Campaigns in Strategy and Effect”. Ph.D. diss.. University of Rochester.
29. Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Steven J. Rosenstone. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.
30. Zaller, John R. 1998. “Let’s Make Campaigns Fun Again”. Paper presented at Princeton University conference on campaign reform, June 18.