Visual abilities in individuals with profound deafness: A critical review

The Neural Bases of Multisensory Processes

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 423-447

  Pavani, Francesco ^a   Bottari, Davide ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85059445197     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (91)

1. Armstrong, B., S. A. Hillyard, H. J. Neville, and T. V. Mitchell. 2002. Auditory deprivation affects processing of motion, but not colour. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research 14: 422-434.
2. Auer, E. T., Jr., and L. E. Bernstein. 2007. Enhanced visual speech perception in individuals with early-onset hearing impairment. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 50(5):1157-1165.
3. Bavelier, D., C. Brozinsky, A. Tomman, T. Mitchell, H. Neville, and G. H. Liu. 2001. Impact of early deaf-ness and early exposure to sign language on the cerebral organization for motion processing. Journal of Neuroscience 21: 8931-8942.
4. Bavelier, D., M. W. G. Dye, and P. C. Hauser. 2006. Do deaf individuals see better? Trends in Cognitive Science 10: 512-518.
5. Bavelier, D., A. Tomann, C. Hutton, T. V. Mitchell, D. P. Corina, G. Liu, and H. J. Neville. 2000. Visual atten-tion to the periphery is enhanced in congenitally deaf individuals. Journal of Neuroscience 20: 1-6.
6. Bernstein, L. E., M. E. Demorest, and P. E. Tucker. 2000. Speech perception without hearing. Perception & Psychophysics 62: 233-252.
7. Bernstein, L. E., E. T. Auer Jr., and P. E. Tucker. 2001. Enhanced speechreading in deaf adults: Can short-term training/practice close the gap for hearing adults? Journal of Speech, Hearing, and Language Research 44: 5-18.
8. Bosworth, R. G., and K. R. Dobkins. 1999. Left-hemisphere dominance for motion processing in deaf signers. Psychological Science 10: 256-262.
9. Bosworth, R. G., and K. R. Dobkins. 2002a. The effect of spatial attention on motion processing in deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing nonsigners. Brain and Cognition 4: 152-169.
10. Bosworth, R. G., and K. R. Dobkins. 2002b. Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers. Brain and Cognition 4: 152-169.
11. Bottari, D., M. Turatto, F. Bonfioli, C. Abbadessa, S. Selmi, M. A. Beltrame, and F. Pavani. 2 008. Change blind-blind-ness in profoundly deaf individuals and cochlear implant recipients. Brain Research 1242: 209-218.
12. Bottari, D., E. Nava, P. Ley, and F. Pavani. 2010. Enhanced reactivity to visual stimuli in deaf individuals. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 28: 167-179.
13. Bottari, D., M. Turatto, and F. Pavani. In preparation. Visual change perception and speeded simple detection in profound deafness.
14. Bravo, M. Y., and K. Nakayama. 1992. The role of attention in different visual search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 51: 465-472.
15. Bross, M. 1979a. Residual sensory capacities of the deaf: A signal detection analysis of a visual discrimination task. Perceptual Motor Skills 1: 187-194.
16. Bross, M. 1979b. Response bias in deaf and hearing subjects as a function of motivational factors. Perceptual Motor Skills 3: 779-782.
17. Bross, M., and H. Sauerwein. 1980. Signal detection analysis of visual flicker in deaf and hearing individuals. Perceptual Motor Skills 51: 839-843.
18. Brozinsky, C. J., and D. Bavelier. 2004. Motion velocity thresholds in deaf signers: Changes in lateralization but not in overall sensitivity. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research 21: 1-10.
19. Chelazzi, L., C. A. Marzi, G. Panozzo, N. Pasqualini, G. Tassinari, and L. Tomazzoli. 1988. Hemiretinal differ- differ-ence in speed of light detection esotropic amblyopes. Vision Research 28(1): 95-104.
20. Chen, Q., M. Zhang, and X. Zhou. 2006. Effects of spatial distribution of attention during inhibition of return IOR on flanker interference in hearing and congenitally deaf people. Brain Research 1109: 117-127.
21. Cohen, L. G., P. Celnik, A. Pascual-Leone, B. Corwell, L. Falz, J. Dambrosia, J. et al. 1997. Functional rel-evance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans. Nature 389: 180-183.
22. Colmenero, J. M., A. Catena, L. J. Fuentes, and M. M. Ramos. 2004. Mechanisms of visuo-spatial orienting in deafness. European Journal Cognitive Psychology 16: 791-805.
23. Corbetta, M., and G. L. Shulman. 2002. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Review Neuroscience 3: 201-21
24. Doehring, D. G., and J. Rosenstein. 1969. Speed of visual perception in deaf children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 12:118-125.
25. Downing, C. J., and S. Pinker. 1985. The spatial structure of visual attention. In Attention and Performance Posner, ed. M. I. Posner and O. S. M. Marin, 171-187. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Dye, M. W., P. C. Hauser, and D. Bavelier. 2008. Visual skills and cross-modal plasticity in deaf readers: Possible implications for acquiring meaning from print. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1145: 71-82.
27. Dye, M. W. G., D. E. Baril, and D. Bavelier. 2007. Which aspects of visual attention are changed by deafness? The case of the Attentional Network Test. Neuropsychologia 45: 1801-1811.
28. Enns, J. T., and R. A. Rensink. 1991. Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line-draw-ings. Psychological Review 98: 335-351.
29. Eriksen, B. A., and C. W. Eriksen. 1974. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics 16: 143-149.
30. Fine, I., E. M. Finney, G. M. Boynton, and K. R. Dobkins. 2005. Comparing the effects of auditory depriva-tion and sign language within the auditory and visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17: 1621-1637.
31. Finney, E. M., and K. R. Dobkins. 2001. Visual contrast sensitivity in deaf versus hearing populations: explor-ing the perceptual consequences of auditory deprivation and experience with a visual language. Cognitive Brain Research 11(1): 171-183.
32. Finney, E. M., I. Fine, and K. R. Dobkins. 2001. Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in the deaf. Natural Neuroscience 4(12): 1171-1173.
33. Finney, E. M., B. A. Clementz, G. Hickok, and K. R. Dobkins. 2003. Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in deaf subjects: Evidence from MEG. Neuroreport 11: 1425-1427.
34. Furth, H. 1966. Thinking without language: Psychological implications of deafness. New York: Free Press.
35. Suchman, R. G. 1966. Color-form preference, discriminative accuracy and learning of deaf and hearing chil-dren. Child Development 37(2): 439-451.
36. Gibson, E. 1969. Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Meredith.
37. Green, D. M., and J. A. Swets. 1966. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
38. Harrington, D. O. 1971. The visual fields. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby.
39. Hartmann, G. W. 1933. Changes in visual acuity through simultaneous stimulation of other sense organs. Journal of Experimental Psychology 16:393-407.
40. Hartung, J. E. 1970. Visual perceptual skill, reading ability, and the young deaf child. Exceptional Children 36(8): 603-638.
41. Hauser, P. C., M. W. G. Dye, M. Boutla, C. S. Gree, and D. Bavelier. 2007. Deafness and visual enumeration: Not all aspects of attention are modified by deafness. Brain Research 1153: 178-187.
42. Heider, F., and G. Heider. 1940. Studies in the psychology of the deaf. Psychological Monographs 52: 6-22.
43. Heffner R. S., and H. E. Heffner. 1992. Visual factors in sound localization in mammals. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 317(3): 219-32.
44. Heming, J. E., and L. N. Brown. 2005. Sensory temporal processing in adults with early hearing loss. Brain and Cognition 59: 173-82.
45. Henderson, S. E., and L. Henderson. 1973. Levels of visual-information processing in deaf and hearing chil-dren. American Journal of Psychology 86(3): 507-521.
46. Hoemann, H. 1978. Perception by the deaf. In Handbook of perception: Perceptual ecology, vol. 10, ed. E. Carterette and M. Friedman, 43-64. NewYork: Academic Press.
47. Jonides, J. 1981. Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In Attention and perfor-mance, Vol. IX, ed. L. B. Long and A. D. Baddeley, 187-203. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Jordan, T. E. 1961. Historical notes on early study of the deaf. Journal of Speech Hearing Disorders 26:118-121.
49. Klein, R. M. 2000. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Science 4: 138-147.
50. Levanen, S., and D. Hamdorf. 2001. Feeling vibrations: Enhanced tactile sensitivity in congenitally deaf humans. Neuroscience Letters 301: 75-77.
51. Li, Z. 2002. A saliency map in primary visual cortex. Trends in Cognitive Science 1: 9-16.
52. Loke, W. H., and S. Song. 1991. Central and peripheral visual processing in hearing and nonhearing individu-als. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29: 437-440.
53. Marendaz, C., C. Robert, and F. Bonthoux. 1997. Deafness and attentional visual search: A developmental study. Perception A: 26.
54. Marzi, C. A., and M. Di Stefano. 1981. Hemiretinal differences in visual perception. Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series 30: 273-278.
55. Mayer, A. R., J. M. Dorflinger, S. M. Rao, and M. Seidenberg. 2004. Neural networks underlying endogenous and exogenous visual-spatial orienting. Neuroimage 2: 534-541
56. Milner, A. D., and M. A. Goodale. 1995. The visual brain in action. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.
57. Mitchell, R. E., and M. A. Karchmer. 2002. Demographics of deaf education: More students in more places. American Annals of the Deaf 151(2, issue 2006): 95-104. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Univ. Press.
58. Mitchell, T., and M. T. Maslin. 2007. How vision matters for individuals with hearing loss. International Journal of Audiology 46(9): 500-511.
59. Mohammed T., R. Campbell, M. MacSweeney, E. Milne, P. Hansen, and M. Coleman. 2005. Speechreading skill and visual movement sensitivity are related in deaf speechreaders. Perception 34: 205-216.
60. Myklebust, H. 1964. The psychology of deafness. New York: Grune and Stratton.
61. Näätänen, R. 1992. Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Nava, E., D. Bottari, M. Zampini, and F. Pavani. 2008. Visual temporal order judgment in profoundly deaf individuals. Experimental Brain research 190(2): 179-188.
63. Neville, H. J., and D. S. Lawson. 1987. Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detec-tion task: an event related potential and behavioral study: II. Congenitally deaf adults. Brain Research 405: 268-283.
64. Neville, H. J., and D. Bavelier. 2002. Human brain plasticity: Evidence from sensory deprivation and altered language experience. Progress in Brain Research 138: 177-188.
65. Neville, H. J., A. Schmidt, and M. Kutas. 1983. Altered visual-evoked potentials in congenitally deaf adults. Brain Research 266(1): 127-132.
66. O'Regan, J. K., H. Deubel, J. J. Clark, and R. A. Rensink. 2000. Picture changes during blinks: Looking with-out seeing and seeing without looking. Visual Cognition 7: 191-212.
67. O'Regan, J. K., R. A. Rensink, and J. J. Clark. 1999. Change-blindness as a result of "mudsplashes." Nature 398: 34.
68. Olson, J. R. 1967. A factor analytic study of the relation between the speed of visual perception and the lan-guage abilities of deaf adolescents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 10(2): 354-360.
69. Parasnis, I. 1983. Visual perceptual skills and deafness: A research review. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology 16: 148-160.
70. Parasnis, I., and V. J. Samar. 1985. Parafoveal attention in congenitally deaf and hearing young adults. Brain and Cognition 4: 313-327.
71. Parasnis, I., V. J. Samar, and G. P. Berent. 2003. Deaf adults without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder display reduced perceptual sensitivity and elevated impulsivity on the Test of Variables of Attention T.O.V.A. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 5: 1166-1183.
72. Poizner, H., and P. Tallal. 1987. Temporal processing in deaf signers. Brain and Language 30: 52-62.
73. Posner, M. 1980. Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32: 3-25.
74. Prinzmetal, W., C. McCool, and S. Park. 2005. Attention: Reaction time and accuracy reveal different mecha-nisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134: 73-92.
75. Prinzmetal, W., A. Zvinyatskovskiy, P. Gutierrez, and L. Dilem. 2009. Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: The effect of perceptual difficulty. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2: 352-369.
76. Proksch, J., and D. Bavelier. 2002. Changes in the spatial distribution of visual attention after early deafness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14: 687-701.
77. Pylyshyn, Z.W. 1989. The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model. Cognition 32: 65-97.
78. Quittner, A. L., P. Leibach, and K. Marciel. 2004. The impact of cochlear implants on young deaf children: New methods to assess cognitive and behavioral development. Archives of Otolaryngology Head Neck and Surgery 5: 547-554.
79. Rensink, R. A. 2001. Change blindness: Implications for the nature of attention. In Vision and Attention, ed. M. R. Jenkin and L. R., 169-188. New York: Springer.
80. Rettenbach, R., G. Diller, and R. Sireteanu. 1999. Do deaf people see better? Texture segmentation and visual search compensate in adult but not in juvenile subjects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5: 560-583.
81. Reynolds, H. 1993. Effects of foveal stimulation on peripheral visual processing and laterality in deaf and hear-ing subjects. American Journal of Psychology 106(4): 523-540.
82. Rönnberg, J. 1995. Perceptual compensation in the deaf and blind: Myth or reality? In Compensating for psy-chological deficits and declines, ed. R. A. Dixon and L. Backman, 251-274. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
83. Sagi, D., and B. Julesz. 1984. Detection versus discrimination of visual orientation. Perception 13(5): 619-628.
84. Sladen, D., A. M. Tharpe, D. H. Ashmead, D. W. Grantham, and M. M. Chun. 2005. Visual attention in deaf and normal hearing adults: effects of stimulus compatibility. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 48: 1-9.
85. Stevens, C., and H. Neville. 2006. Neuroplasticity as a double-edged sword: Deaf enhancements and dyslexic deficits in motion processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18: 701-714.
86. Stivalet, P., Y. Moreno, J. Richard, P. A. Barraud, and C. Raphael. 1998. Differences in visual search tasks between congenitally deaf and normally hearing adults. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research 6: 227-232.
87. Suchman, R. G. 1966. Color-form preference, discriminative accuracy and learning of deaf and hearing chil-dren. Child Development 2: 439-451.
88. Summerfield, Q. 1991. Visual perception of phonetic gestures. In Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception, ed. I. G. Mattingly and M. Studdert-Kennedy, 117-137. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
89. Treisman, A. 1982. Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perceptual Performance 2: 94-214.
90. Turatto, M., and B. Brigeman. 2005. Change perception using visual transients: Object substitution and dele-tion. Experimental Brain Research 167: 595-608.
91. Turatto, M., M. Valsecchi, L. Tamè, and E. Betta. 2007. Microsaccades distinguish between global and local visual processing. Neuroreport 18:1015-1018.