The Role of Task Sequencing in Monologic Oral Production

Task Sequencing and Instructed Second Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 71-93

  Malicka, Aleksandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85059092056     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Ishikawa, T. (2008). Investigating the Effect of Intentional Reasoning Demands on L2 Speech Production. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Aoyama Gakuin University, Tokyo, Japan.
3. Ishikawa, T. (2011). Examining the influence of intentional reasoning demands on learner perceptions of task difficulty and L2 monologic speech. In P. Robinson (ed.), Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 307-30). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Kellerman, E. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass and C. Madden (eds), Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 345-53). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
5. Kim, Y., and Tracy-Ventura, N. (2011). Task complexity, language anxiety, and the development of the simple past. In P. Robinson (ed.), Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 287-308). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6. Kuiken, F., Mos, M. and Vedder, I. (2005). Cognitive task complexity and second language writing performance. In S. Foster-Cohen, M. P. García-Mayo and J. Cenoz (eds), Eurosla Yearbook. Vol. 5 (pp. 195-222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
7. Lee, Y.-G. (2002). Effects of Task Complexity on the Complexity and Accuracy of Oral Production in L2 Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, USA.
8. Malicka, A. and Levkina, M. (2012). Measuring task complexity. Does EFL proficiency matter? In A. Shehadeh and C. Coombe (eds) Task-based Language Teaching in Foregin Language Contexts. Research and Implementation. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
9. MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Michel, M. (2011). Cognitive and Interactive Aspects of Task-based Performance in Dutch as a Second Language. ‘s-Hertogenbosch: Uitgeverij BOXPress.
11. Michel, M. C., Kuiken, F., and Vedder, I. (2007). The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 241-59.
12. Niwa, Y. (2000). Reasoning Demands of L2 tasks and L2 Narrative Production: Effects of Individual Differences in Working Memory, Intelligence and Aptitude. Unpublished M.A. dissertation, Aoyama Gakuin University, Tokyo, Japan.
13. Nuevo, A. (2006). Task Complexity and Interaction: L2 Learning Opportunities and Development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, USA.
14. Nuevo, A.-M., Adams, R., and Ross-Feldman, L. (2011). Task complexity, modified output, and L2 development in learner-learner interaction. In P. Robinson (ed.), Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 175-202). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
15. Révész, A. (2011). Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom-based study. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 162-81.
16. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27-57.
17. Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. Doughty and M. H. Long (eds), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 631-78). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
18. Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43(1), 1-32.
19. Robinson, P. (2007). Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In Maria del Pilar Garcia Mayo (ed.), Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning (pp. 7-26). Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.
20. Robinson, P. (2010). Situating and distributing cognition across task demands: The SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In L. Sicola and M. Putz (eds), Cognitive Processing in Second Language Acquisition: Inside the Learner’s Mind (pp. 246-69). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Sasayama, S. and Izumi, S. (2012). Effects of task complexity and pre-task planning on Japanese EFL learners’ oral production. In A. Shehadeh and C. Coombe (eds) Task-based Language Teaching in Foreign Language Contexts. Research and Implementation. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
22. Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38-62.
23. Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Skehan, P., and Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and Second Language Learning (pp. 183-205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.