Identifying and supporting exploratory and exploitative models of innovation in municipal urban planning; key challenges from seven Norwegian energy ambitious neighborhood pilots

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 142, Issue , 2019, Pages 142-153

  Nielsen, Brita Fladvad ^a   Baer, Daniela ^b   Lindkvist, Carmel ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b SINTEF   (Norway)

Author keywords

Explorative innovation; Integrated energy planning; Smart Cities; Smart energy communities; Sustainable urban planning; Zero emission neighborhoods

Indexed keywords

SMART CITY; URBAN PLANNING;

AMBIDEXTROUS ORGANIZATIONS; HIERARCHICAL LEVEL; INNOVATION METHODS; INTEGRATED ENERGY PLANNING; INTEGRATED PLANNING; SMART ENERGIES; TECHNOLOGICAL OPPORTUNITY; ZERO EMISSION;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY PLANNING; HOLISTIC APPROACH; INNOVATION; NEIGHBORHOOD; SMART CITY; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN PLANNING;

NORWAY;

EID: 85058775128     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Al Nuaimi, E., Al Neyadi, H., Mohamed, N., Al-Jaroodi, J., Applications of big data to smart cities. J. Internet Serv. Applic., 6, 2015, 25.
2. Alonso, M.J., Stene, J., Bantle, M., Georges, L., Simulations of Heat Pumps for Nearly Zero Energy Buildings. 2013, Country Report of IEA HPP Annex.
3. Bertoldi, P., Cayuela, D.B., Monni, S., De Raveschoot, R.P., Existing Methodologies and Tools for the Development and Implementation of Sustainable Energy Action Plans (SEAP). 2010, Covenant of Mayors (EUR, 24309).
4. Campbell, S., Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 62 (1996), 296–312.
5. Dixon, T., Eames, M., Britnell, J., Watson, G.B., Hunt, M., Urban retrofitting: identifying disruptive and sustain technologies using performative and foresight techniques. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 89 (2014), 131–144.
6. Dixon, T., Eames, M., Britnell, J., Watson, G.B., Hunt, M., Urban retrofitting: identifying disruptive and sustaining technologies using performative and foresight techniques. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 89 (2014), 131–144.
7. Dixon, T., Eames, M., Britnell, J., Watson, G.B., Hunt, M.J.T.F., Change, S., Urban Retrofitting: Identifying Disruptive and Sustaining Technologies Using Performative and Foresight Techniques. 89, 2014, 131–144.
8. Dobre, C., Xhafa, F., Intelligent services for Big Data science. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 37 (2014), 267–281.
9. Eames, M., Marvin, S., Hodson, M., Dixon, T.J., Guthrie, P., Lannon, S., Briefing: re-engineering the city 2020–2050–urban foresight and transition management. P. O. T. I. O. C. E.-U. D. & Planning, 167, 2012, 1–4.
10. Eising, R., Jabko, N., Moving targets: national interests and electricity liberalization in the European Union. Comp. Pol. Stud. 34 (2001), 742–767.
11. Elwood, S.A., Embedding ubiquitous technologies. Ubiquitous and Pervasive Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 2010, IGI Global.
12. EU Emissions Trading Initiation, Birger Skjærseth, Jon, Wettestad, Jørgen, (eds.) Initiation, Decision-making and Implementation, 1st Ed., 2016, Imprint Routledge, London, 230 First Published 28 February 2008.
13. Guhathakurta, S., Urban modeling as storytelling: using simulation models as a narrative. Environ. Plann. B. Plann. Des. 29 (2002), 895–911.
14. Hall, R.E., Bowerman, B., Braverman, J., Taylor, J., Todosow, H., Von Wimmersperg, U., The Vision of a Smart City. 2000, Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (US).
15. Harrison, K.W., Dumas, R.D., Solano, E., Barlaz, M.A., Brill, D.D.J., Ranjithan, R., Decision support tool for life-cycle-based solid waste management. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 15:1 (2001), 44–58.
16. Hollands, R.G., Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial?. City 12 (2008), 303–320.
17. Holman, N.J.L.E., Incorporating Local Sustainability Indicators Into Structures of Local Governance: A Review of the Literature. 14, 2009, 365–375.
18. Hughes, Chu, Mason, Multilevel governance and climate change innovations in cities. Climate Change in Cities, 2018, 361–378.
19. Jonassen, D.H., Hernandez-Serrano, J., Case-based reasoning and instructional design: using stories to support problem solving. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 50 (2002), 65–77.
20. Kallaos, J., Valentis, G., Houssin, L., Bharathi, K., Shrestha, P., Acre, F., Lobaccaro, G., Landa, N., Wyckmans, A., D2. 3-Climate resilience in architecture, infrastructure and urban environments. Analysis of RAMSES Case Study Cities, 2015.
21. Kylili, A., Fokaides, P.A., European smart cities: the role of zero energy buildings. Sustain. Cities Soc. 15 (2015), 86–95.
22. Lazaroiu, G.C., Roscia, M.J.E., Definition Methodology for the Smart Cities Model. 47, 2012, 326–332.
23. Lee, J.H., Phaal, R., Lee, S.-H., An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 80 (2013), 286–306.
24. Levinthal, D.A., March, J.G., The myopia of learning. Strateg. Manag. J. 14 (1993), 95–112.
25. Lindkvist, C., Contextualizing learning approaches which shape BIM for maintenance. Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag. 5 (2015), 318–330.
26. Lindkvist, C., Juhasz-Nagy, E., Nielsen, B.F., Intermediaries for knowledge transfer in integrated energy planning of urban districts. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 2018.
27. Magnusson, M., Martini, A., Dual Organisational Capabilities: From Theory to Practice – The Next Challenge for Continuous Innovation. 2008.
28. March, J.G., Olsen, J.P., The uncertainty of the past: organizational learning under ambiguity. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 3 (1975), 147–171.
29. Marszal, A.J., Heiselberg, P., Bourrelle, J.S., Musall, E., Voss, K., Sartori, I., Napolitano, A., Zero energy building–a review of definitions and calculation methodologies. Energ. Buildings 43 (2011), 971–979.
30. Martini, A., Laugen, B.T., Gastaldi, L., Corso, M., Continuous innovation: towards a paradoxical, ambidextrous combination of exploration and exploitation. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 61 (2013), 1–22.
31. McCormack, C., Storying stories: a narrative approach to in-depth interview conversations. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 7 (2004), 219–236.
32. Mirakyan, A., De Guio, R., Integrated energy planning in cities and territories: a review of methods and tools. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 22 (2013), 289–297.
33. Moe, E., The Political Economy of Sustainable Energy Transitions. 2016, MIT Press.
34. Narvestad, R.A., Casestudier av norske byutviklingsprosjekter med miljø-og kvalitetskrav (Casestudies of Norwegian neighbourhood developments with environmental and quality demands). Sintef, Report, 2010.
35. Nielsen, Brita Fladvad, Resch, Eirik, Andresen, Inger, The role of utility companies in municipal planning of smart energy communities. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 13 (2017), 695–706.
36. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., Tushman, M.L., Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ. Sci. 20 (2009), 685–695.
37. Resch, E., Andresen, I., A database tool for systematic analysis of embodied emissions in buildings and neighborhoods. Buildings, 2018.
38. Sandelowski, M., Telling stories: narrative approaches in qualitative research. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 23 (1991), 161–166.
39. Söderström, O., Paasche, T., Klauser, F., Smart cities as corporate storytelling. City 18 (2014), 307–320.
40. Svenfelt, Å., Engstrom, R., Svane, O., Decreasing energy use in building by 50% by 2050—a backcasting study using stakeholder groups. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 78 (2011), 785–796.
41. Swisher, J.N., Martino, J., Redlinger, R.Y., Tools and methods for integrated resource planning. Improving energy efficiency and protecting the environment. United Nations Environmental Programme, 1997.
42. Viitanen, J., Kingston, R., Smart cities and green growth: outsourcing democratic and environmental resilience to the global technology sector. Environ. Plan. A, 45, 2013.
43. Webster, L., Mertova, P., Using Narrative Inquiry as a Research Method: An Introduction to Using Critical Event Narrative Analysis in Research on Learning and Teaching. 2007, Routledge.
44. Weick, K.E., (J. T. O. S. P. I) Sensemaking in Organizations (Foundations for Organizational Science), 1995.
45. Whyte, J., Stasis, A., Lindkvist, C., Managing change in the delivery of complex projects: configuration management, asset information and ‘big data’. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 34 (2016), 339–351.
46. Zoughbi, S., Al-Nasrawi, S., Regional development getting smarter with ICT. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Third edition, 2015, IGI Global.