The role of utility companies in municipal planning of smart energy communities

International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 695-706

  Fladvad Nielsen, Brita ^a   Resch, Eirik ^a   Andresen, Inger ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Energy planning; Integrated energy planning; Smart Energy Communities; Sustainable urban planning; Zero Emission Neighbourhoods

Indexed keywords

EMISSION CONTROL; GREENHOUSE GASES; PLANNING;

EMISSION REDUCTION; ENERGY PLANNING; ENERGY SUPPLIES; INTEGRATED ENERGY PLANNING; MUNICIPAL PLANNING; SMART ENERGIES; UTILITY COMPANIES; ZERO EMISSION;

GAS EMISSIONS;

DESIGN; EMISSION CONTROL; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GREENHOUSE GAS; NEIGHBORHOOD; PLANNING PROCESS; SOLAR POWER; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN PLANNING;

BERGEN; HORDALAND; NORWAY; OSLO [NORWAY];

EID: 85049326648     PISSN: 17437601     EISSN: 1743761X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2495/SDP-V13-N4-695-706     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Pan, W., System boundaries of zero carbon buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37, pp. 424-434, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.015
2. Kristjansdottir, T.F., Heeren, N., Andresen, I. & Brattebø, H., Comparative emission analysis of low-energy and zero-emission buildings. Building Research & Information, 1-16, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1305690
3. Lindberg, K.B., Doorman, G., Fischer, D., Korpås, M., Ånestad, A. & Sartori, I., Methodology for optimal energy system design of Zero Energy Buildings using mixed-integer linear programming. Energy and Buildings, 127, pp. 194-205, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.039
4. Byråd for Klima kon. KLIMA- OG ENERGIHANDLINGSPLAN FOR BERGEN, 2016.
5. Climate CoOAf. Climate and Energy Strategy for Oslo; Adopted by the City Council in Oslo 22.06.2016 (Proposition 195/16). 2016.
6. Graabak, I., Bakken, B.H. & Feilberg, N., Zero emission building and conversion factors between electricity consumption and emissions of greenhouse gases in a long term perspective. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 13(1), pp. 12-19, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2014-0002
7. Sartori, I., Dokka, T. & Andresen, I., Proposal of a Norwegian ZEB definition: assessing the implications for design. Journal of Green Building, 6(3), pp. 133-150, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.6.3.133
8. Bulkeley, H. & Betsill, M., Rethinking sustainable cities: multilevel governance and the'urban'politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), pp. 42-63, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000310178
9. Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L.J., Quinlan, A.E., Peterson, G.D., Wilkinson, C., Fünfgeld, H., McEvoy, D., Porter, L. & Davoudi, S., Resilience: a bridging concept or a dead end?“Reframing” resilience: challenges for planning theory and practice interacting traps: resilience assessment of a pasture management system in Northern Afghanistan urban resilience: what does it mean in planning practice? Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? The politics of resilience for planning: a cautionary note: edited by Simin Davoudi and Libby Porter. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), pp. 299-333, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
10. Henry, C., Matheu, M. & Jeunemaitre, A., Regulation of network utilities: the European experience, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 2001.
11. Newberry, D.M., Privatization, restructuring, and regulation of network utilities. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.
12. Monstadt, J., Urban governance and the transition of energy systems: Institutional change and shifting energy and climate policies in Berlin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(2), pp. 326-343, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00725.x
13. Serrallés, R.J., Electric energy restructuring in the European Union: integration, subsidiarity and the challenge of harmonization. Energy Policy, 34(16), pp. 2542-2551, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.041
14. Eising, R., Policy learning in embedded negotiations: explaining EU electricity liberalization. International Organization, 56(1), pp. 85-120, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802753485142
15. Marius Lorentzen LS, Ertesvåg F. Rett til slaktebenken: Oslo kommune vil kjøpe tilbake og dele opp Hafslund. e24no. 2017 26.04.2017.
16. Mirakyan, A. & De Guio, R., Integrated energy planning in cities and territories: a review of methods and tools. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, pp. 289-297, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.033
17. Bagnoli, A., Beyond the standard interview: the use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qualitative Research, 9(5), pp. 547-570, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109343625
18. Crilly, N., Blackwell, A.F. & Clarkson, P.J., Graphic elicitation: using research diagrams as interview stimuli. Qualitative Research, 6(3), pp. 341-366, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106065007
19. Biernacki, P. & Waldorf, D., Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), pp. 141-163, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418101000205
20. Gabillet, P., Energy supply and urban planning projects: Analysing tensions around district heating provision in a French eco-district. Energy Policy, 78, pp. 189-197, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.006
21. Guy, S. & Marvin, S., Understanding sustainable cities: competing urban futures. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(3), pp. 268-275, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977649900600307