-
1
-
-
10644296780
-
-
Oxford: Oxford University Press
-
Endicott, T. (2000) Vagueness in Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
(2000)
Vagueness in Law
-
-
Endicott, T.1
-
2
-
-
78649930830
-
The value of vagueness
-
V. K. Bhatia, J. Engberg, M. Gotti and D. Heller, Bern: Peter Lang
-
Endicott, T. (2005) “The Value of Vagueness,” in V. K. Bhatia, J. Engberg, M. Gotti and D. Heller, eds., Vagueness in Normative Texts, Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 27–48.
-
(2005)
Vagueness in Normative Texts
, pp. 27-48
-
-
Endicott, T.1
-
3
-
-
33749555591
-
Shifting sands: An interest-relative theory of vagueness
-
Fara, D. G. (2000) “Shifting Sands: An Interest-Relative Theory of Vagueness,” Philosophical Topics 28: 48–81.
-
(2000)
Philosophical Topics
, vol.28
, pp. 48-81
-
-
Fara, D.G.1
-
4
-
-
34248938788
-
Vagueness, truth, and logic
-
Fine, K. (1975) “Vagueness, Truth, and Logic,” Synthese 30: 265–300.
-
(1975)
Synthese
, vol.30
, pp. 265-300
-
-
Fine, K.1
-
5
-
-
0000580092
-
Positivism and the separation of law and morals
-
Hart, H. L. A. (1958) “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,” Harvard Law Review 71: 593–629.
-
(1958)
Harvard Law Review
, vol.71
, pp. 593-629
-
-
Hart, H.L.A.1
-
7
-
-
4444351182
-
-
New York: Oxford University Press
-
Soames, S. (1999) Understanding Truth, New York: Oxford University Press.
-
(1999)
Understanding Truth
-
-
Soames, S.1
-
8
-
-
24644453241
-
Higher order vagueness for partially defined predicates
-
J. C. Beall, Oxford: Clarendon Press; reprinted in S. Soames (2009), Philosophical Essays, Princeton: Princeton University Press
-
Soames, S. (2003) “Higher Order Vagueness for Partially Defined Predicates,” in J. C. Beall, ed., Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox, Oxford: Clarendon Press; reprinted in S. Soames (2009) Philosophical Essays, Volume 2, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
(2003)
Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox
, vol.2
-
-
Soames, S.1
-
9
-
-
84859637886
-
Interpreting legal texts: What is, and what is not, special about the law
-
S. Soames, Princeton: Princeton University Press
-
Soames, S. (2009) “Interpreting Legal Texts: What Is, and What Is Not, Special about the Law,” in S. Soames, Philosophical Essays, Volume 1, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
(2009)
Philosophical Essays
, vol.1
-
-
Soames, S.1
-
10
-
-
84921555632
-
The possibility of partial definition
-
R. Dietz and S. Moruzzi, Oxford: Oxford University Press; reprinted in S. Soames (2009), Philosophical Essays, Princeton: Princeton University Press
-
Soames, S. (2010) “The Possibility of Partial Definition,” in R. Dietz and S. Moruzzi, eds., Cuts and Clouds: Vagueness, Its Nature and Its Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press; reprinted in S. Soames (2009) Philosophical Essays, Volume 2, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
(2010)
Cuts and Clouds: Vagueness, Its Nature and Its Logic
, vol.2
-
-
Soames, S.1
-
11
-
-
84919845058
-
What vagueness and inconsistency tell us about interpretation
-
A. Marmor and S. Soames, Oxford: Oxford University Press
-
Soames, S. (2011) “What Vagueness and Inconsistency Tell Us about Interpretation,” in A. Marmor and S. Soames, eds., The Philosophical Foundations of Language in the Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–57.
-
(2011)
The Philosophical Foundations of Language in the Law
, pp. 31-57
-
-
Soames, S.1
-
12
-
-
84924557523
-
Vagueness has no function in law
-
Sorenson, R. (2001) “Vagueness Has No Function in Law,” Legal Theory 7: 387–416.
-
(2001)
Legal Theory
, vol.7
, pp. 387-416
-
-
Sorenson, R.1
-
13
-
-
21244470539
-
The liar and sorites paradoxes: Toward a unified treatment
-
Tappendon, J. (1993) “The Liar and Sorites Paradoxes: Toward a Unified Treatment,” Journal of Philosophy 90: 551–77.
-
(1993)
Journal of Philosophy
, vol.90
, pp. 551-577
-
-
Tappendon, J.1
-
15
-
-
60949224990
-
Knowing and asserting
-
Williamson, T. (1996) “Knowing and Asserting,” Philosophical Review 105: 489–523.
-
(1996)
Philosophical Review
, vol.105
, pp. 489-523
-
-
Williamson, T.1
|