Subjectivity and intersubjectivity as aspects of epistemic stance marking

Studies in Pragmatics

Volumn 10, Issue , 2012, Pages 229-246

  Mortensen, Janus ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85057145145     PISSN: 1750368X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Adolphs, S. (2008). Definitely maybe: Modality clusters and politeness in spoken discourse. In P. Skandera (Ed.), Phraseology and culture in English (pp. 257-274). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2. Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Andersen, T. (1982). Modalpartikler og deres funktion i dansk. Danske Studier, 86-95.
4. Baumgarten, N., & House, J. (2007). Speaker stances in native and non-native English conversation: I+verb constructions. In J. D. ten Thije & L. Zeevaert (Eds.), Receptive multilingualism: Linguistic analyses, language policies and didactic concepts (pp. 195-214). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
5. Baumgarten, N., & House, J. (2010). I think and I don't know in English as lingua franca and native English discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1184-1200.
6. Benveniste, É. (1971). Subjectivity in language. In É. Benveniste (Ed.), Problems in general linguistics (pp. 223-230, M. E. Meek, Trans.). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press. (Original published 1966.).
7. Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1988). Adverbial stances types in English. Discourse Processes, 11 (1), 1.
9. Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9(1), 93-124.
10. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.
11. Boye, K. (2006). Epistemic meaning: A cross-linguistic study. PhD thesis. Copenhagen University, Copenhagen.
12. Carretero, M. (1992). The role of epistemic modality in English politeness strategies. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 13, 17-36.
13. Christensen, T. K. (2006). Hyperparadigmer: En undersøgelse af paradigmatiske samspil i danske modussystemer. PhD thesis, Roskilde University, Roskilde. Retrieved from http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/2993
14. Coates, J. (1987). Epistemic modality and spoken discourse. Transactions of the Philological Society, 85(1), 110-131.
15. Downing, A. (2001). Surely you knew! Surely as a marker of evidentiality and stance. Functions of Language, 8(2), 251-282.
16. Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139-182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. Edmondson, W. J. (1981). Spoken discourse: A model for analysis. London: Longman.
18. Fitzmaurice, S. (2000). Tentativeness and insistence in the expression of politeness in Margaret Cavendish's Sociable Letters. Language and Literature, 9(1), 7-24.
19. Gumperz, J. J. (1996). Introduction to part IV: The social matrix: Culture, praxis, and discourse. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 359-373). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Hansen, E., & Heltoft, L. (2011). Grammatik over det Danske sprog. København: Det Danske Sprog-og Litteraturselskab.
21. Harder, P. (1975). Prædikatstruktur og kommunikativ funktion. NyS, 8, 103-112.
22. Holmes, J. (1982). Expressing doubt and certainty in English. RELC Journal, 13(2), 9-28.
23. Holmes, J. (1984a). Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: Some evidence for hedges as support structures. Te Reo, 27, 47-62.
24. Holmes, J. (1984b). Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics, 8(3), 345-365.
25. Holmes, J. (1988). Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 21-44.
26. House, J., & Kasper, G. (1981). Politeness markers in English and German. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routine. Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech (pp. 157-185). The Hague: Mouton.
27. Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28. Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Text and Talk, 7(2), 173-192.
29. Jensen, E. S. (2002). On the development of Danish sentence adverbials. In H. Jansen, P. Polito, L. Schøsler & E. Strudsholm (Eds.), L'infinito & oltre. Omaggio a Gunver Skytte (pp. 463-480). Odense: Odense University Press.
30. Kronning, H. (2004). Kunskapens källa och kunskapens styrka: Epistemisk konditionalis i franskan som evidentiellt och modalt grammatisk uttryck. In K. Segerberg, (Ed.), Kungl. Humanistiska Vetenskaps-Samfundet i Uppsala. Årsbok 2002 (pp. 43-123). Uppsala: Swedish Science Press.
31. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Kärkkäinen, E. (1992). Modality as a strategy in interaction: Epistemic modality in the language of native and non-native speakers of English. In L. F. Bouton, Y. Kachru (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 3, pp. 197-216). Monograph Series. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
33. Kärkkäinen, E. (2003). Epistemic stance in English conversation. A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
34. Kärkkäinen, E. (2006). Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text&Talk, 26(6), 699-731.
35. Kärkkäinen, E., Keisanen, T., Rauniomaa, M., Niemelä, M., & Haddington, P. (2004). Not just old hat: Stance as an emergent, contingent and dialogic concept. In J.-O. Östman (Ed.), PIC Bulletin 7 (pp. 48-59). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
36. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Lyons, J. (1994). Subjecthood and subjectivity. In M. Yaguello (Ed.), Subjecthood and Subjectivity: The status of the subject in linguistic theory: Proceedings of the colloquium The Status of the Subject in Linguistic Theory, London, 19-20 March 1993 (pp. 9-17). Paris: Ophrys.
38. Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
39. Mortensen, J. (2006). Epistemic and evidential sentence adverbials in Danish and English: A comparative study. Cand. Mag. Thesis. Roskilde University, Roskilde. Retrieved from hdl.handle.net/1800/5032
40. Mortensen, J. (2010). Epistemic stance marking in the use of English as a lingua franca: A comparative study of the pragmatic functions of epistemic stance marking in problem-solving sequences at student project group meetings, with special emphasis on meetings where English is used as a lingua franca. PhD thesis. Roskilde University, Roskilde.
41. Mortensen, J. (2012). Epistemisk positionering i dansk talesprog. NyS, 42, 62-91.
42. Nikula, T. (1996). Pragmatic force modifiers: A study in interlanguage pragmatics. Jyväskylä: Scientific publishing.
43. Nuyts, J. (2001a). Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
44. Nuyts, J. (2001b). Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 383-400.
45. Ochs, E. (1996). Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 407-437). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Precht, K. (2003). Stance moods in spoken English: Evidentiality and affect in British and American conversation. Text, 23(2), 239-257.
48. Precht, K. (2008). Sex similarities and differences in stance in informal American conversation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(1), 89-112.
49. Preisler, B. (1986). Linguistic sex roles in conversation: Social variation in the expression of tentativeness in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
50. Schubiger, M. (1965). English intonation and German modal particles - A comparative study. Phonetica, 12, 65-84.
51. Therkelsen, R., and Andersen, N. M., & Nølke, H. (Eds.). (2009). Sproglig polyfoni: Tekster om Bachtin & ScaPoLine. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
52. White, P. R. R. (2000). Dialogue and inter-subjectivity: Reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging. In M. Coulthard, J. Cotterill & F. Rock (Eds.), Dialogue analysis VII: Working with dialogue (pp. 67-80). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
53. White, P. R. R. (2003). Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text, 23(2), 259-284.
54. Youmans, M. (2001). Cross-cultural differences in polite epistemic modal use in American English. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 22(1), 57-73.