The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: The Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI)

International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2019, Pages 36-43

  Munn, Zachary ^a   Aromataris, Edoardo ^a   Tufanaru, Catalin ^a   Stern, Cindy ^a   Porritt, Kylie ^a   Farrow, James ^b   Lockwood, Craig ^a   Stephenson, Matthew ^a   Moola, Sandeep ^a   Lizarondo, Lucylynn ^a   McArthur, Alexandra ^a   Peters, Micah ^a   Pearson, Alan ^a   Jordan, Zoe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b Farrow Norris   (Australia)

Author keywords

Joanna Briggs Institute; meta analysis; software; systematic review

Indexed keywords

SOFTWARE;

SOFTWARE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85056807412     PISSN: 17441595     EISSN: 17441609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000152     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J,. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: b2700.
2. Aromataris E, Pearson A,. The systematic review: an overview. Am J Nurs 2014; 114: 53-58.
3. Woolf S, Schünemann HJ, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Shekelle P,. Developing clinical practice guidelines: types of evidence and outcomes; values and economics, synthesis, grading, and presentation and deriving recommendations. Implement Sci 2012; 7: 61.
4. Munn Z, Porritt K, Lockwood C, Aromataris E, Pearson A,. Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14: 108.
5. Pearson A,. Balancing the evidence: incorporating the synthesis of qualitative data into systematic reviews. JBI Rep 2004; 2 (45-64)
6. Pearson A, Jordan Z, Munn Z,. Translational science and evidence-based healthcare: a clarification and reconceptualization of how knowledge is generated and used in healthcare. Nurs Res Pract 2012; 2012: 792519.
7. Steinberg E, Greenfield S, Mancher M, Wolman DM, Graham R,. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
8. Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Jordan Z,. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018; 18: 5.
9. Pearson A, Wiechula R, Court A, Lockwood C,. The JBI model of evidence-based healthcare. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2005; 3: 207-215.
10. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE,. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 924-926.
11. Aromataris E, Munn Z,. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual. Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute; 2017.
12. Ganann R, Ciliska D, Thomas H,. Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews. Implement Sci 2010; 5: 56.
13. Khangura S, Konnyu K, Cushman R, Grimshaw J, Moher D,. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev 2012; 1: 10.
14. Harker J, Kleijnen J,. What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2012; 10: 397-410.
15. Borah R, Brown AW, Capers PL, Kaiser KA,. Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e012545.
16. Marshall C, Brereton P,. Systematic review toolbox: a catalogue of tools to support systematic reviews. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. ACM; 2015. p. 23.
17. Dybå T, Dingsøyr T,. Empirical studies of agile software development: a systematic review. Inform Softw Technol 2008; 50 (9-10): 833-859.
18. Atlassian. Jira Software. 2018. https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira.
19. Viechtbauer W,. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 2010; 36: 1-48.
20. Clarivate Analytics. Endnote; 2017. https://endnote.com/.
21. Lockwood C, Munn Z, Porritt K,. Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015; 13: 179-187.
22. Stern C, Munn Z, Porritt K,. An international educational training course for conducting systematic reviews in healthcare: the Joanna Briggs Institute's Comprehensive Systematic Review Training Program. Worldviews Evid Based Nursing 2018. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12314. [Epub ahead of print].
23. Gates A, Vandermeer B, Hartling L,. Technology-assisted risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews: a prospective cross-sectional evaluation of the RobotReviewer machine learning tool. J Clin Epidemiol 2017.
24. Thomas J, Noel-Storr A, Marshall I,. Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort. J Clin Epidemiol 2017; 91: 31-37.
25. Beller E, Clark J, Tsafnat G,. Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR). Syst Rev 2018; 7: 77.