The systematic review: An overview

American Journal of Nursing

Volumn 114, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 53-58

  Aromataris, Edoardo ^a   Pearson, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; NURSING RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE CENTER; EXERCISE; MEDICINE; NURSE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ACADEMIES AND INSTITUTES; DATA COLLECTION; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HUMANS; NURSING RESEARCH; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84899139973     PISSN: 0002936X     EISSN: 15387488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Krainovich-Miller B. Literature review. In: LoBiondo-Wood G, Haber J, eds. Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2006.
2. Eger M, et al. Rationale, potentials, and promise of systematic reviews. In: Egger M, et al., eds. Systematic reviews in health care: Meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2001. p. 3-19.
3. Averis A, Pearson A. Filling the gaps: Identifying nursing research priorities through the analysis of completed systematic reviews. JBI Reports 2003;1(3):49-126.
4. Ubbink DT, et al. Framework of policy recommendations for implementation of evidence-based practice: A systematic scoping review. BMJ Open 2013;3(1).
5. Joanna Briggs Institute. An introduction to systematic reviews. Changing practice: evidence based practice information sheets for health professionals. 2001;5(Suppl 1): 1-6.
6. Pearson A, et al. The JBI model of evidence-based healthcare. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2005;3(8):207-15.
7. Tricco AC, et al. The art and science of knowledge synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(1):11-20.
8. Khan KS, et al. Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J R Soc Med 2003;96(3):118-21.
9. Green S, et al. Introduction. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester, West Sussex; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
10. Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151(4):264-9, W64.
11. Stone PW. Popping the (PICO) question in research and evidence-based practice. Appl Nurs Res 2002;15(3): 197-8.
12. Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual: 2011 edition. Adelaide, South Australia: University of Adelaide; 2011. http://joannabriggs.org/assets/docs/sumari/ReviewersManual-2011.pdf.
13. Mares MA, McNally S. The effectiveness of nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation programs following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A systematic review protocol. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. 2013;11(11):21-32.
14. Crowther M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis methodology. Blood 2010;116(17):3140-6.
15. Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs 2005;52(5):546-53.
16. Pawson R, et al. Realist review-a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;10 Suppl 1:21-34.