A Multi-criteria Framework for Decision Process in Retrofit Optioneering through Interactive Data Flow

Procedia Engineering

Volumn 180, Issue , 2017, Pages 859-869

  Cecconi, Fulvio Re ^a   Tagliabue, Lavinia C ^b   Maltese, Sebastiano ^a   Zuccaro, Martina ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

BEM; BIM; LCC; multi criteria decision making; Refurbishment

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; LIFE CYCLE; OFFICE BUILDINGS; RETROFITTING;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; BUILDING ENERGY MODELLING; BUILDING INFORMATION MODEL - BIM; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; EXISTING OFFICE BUILDINGS; MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; REFURBISHMENT; RETROFIT OF EXISTING BUILDINGS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 85020539911     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18777058     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.247     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Directive 2010/31/EU of The European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance in buildings (recast), Journal of the European Union L. 153/13, 18.6.2010.
2. Legge ordinaria del Parlamento no 373/76 "Norme per il contenimento del consumo energetico per usi termici negli edifici", pubblicata sulla Gazzetta Ufficiale Italiana no 148 del 07/06/1976.
3. Legge 9 gennaio 1991, n. 10, in materia di "Norme per l'attuazione del Piano energetico nazionale in materia di uso razionale dell'energia, di risparmio energetico e di sviluppo delle fonti rinnovabili di energia".
4. C.A. Balaras, and et al. Potential for energy conservation in apartment buildings Energy & Buildings 31 2 2000 143 154
5. Z. Ma, P. Cooper, D. Daly, and L. Ledo Existing building retrofits: method- ology and state-of-the-art Energy and Buildings 55 2012 889 902
6. ENEA, Caratterizzazione dei consumi energetici nazionali delle strutture ad uso ufficio, (2009), www.enea.it/enea-paese.
7. D.P.R. 26 agosto 1993, n. 412, Regolamento recante norme per la progettazione, l'installazione, l'esercizio e la manutenzione degli impianti termici degli edifici ai fini del contenimento dei consumi di energia, in attuazione dell'art. 4, comma 4, della L. 9 gennaio 1991, n. 10, Gazz. Uff. 14 ottobre 1993, n. 242, S.O.
8. ENEA, Rapporto energia e ambiente 2007. Analisi e scenari, Ente per le Nuove tecnologie, l'Energia e l'Ambiente, Roma, 2008.
9. ENEA, Valutazione dei consumi nell'edilizia esistente e benchmark mediante codici semplificati: analisi di edifici residenziali, Roma 2008.
10. P. de Wildea, M. van der Voordenb, Providing computational support for the selection of energy saving building components, Energy and Buildings, Volume 36, Issue 8, August 2004, Pages 749-758.
11. Y. Shao, P. Geyer, W. Lang, Integrating requirement analysis and multi-objective optimization for office building energy retrofit strategies, Energy and Buildings, Volume 82, October 2014, Pages 356-368.
12. C. L. Hwang, K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, 1981.
13. S. H. Zanakis, A. Solomon, N. Wishart, S. Dublish, Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods, European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 107, 1998, Pages 507-529.
14. S.J. Chen, C.L. Hwang, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, No. 375, Sringer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1992.
15. E. Triantaphyllou, B. Shu, S. Nieto Sanchez, and T. Ray, Multi-Criteria Decision Making: An Operations Research Approach, Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, (J.G. Webster, Ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, Vol. 15, pp. 175-186, 1998.
16. T. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
17. G. Zheng, Y. Jing, H. Huang, G. Shi, X. Zhang, Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchical process model for building energy conservation assessment, J. Renewable energy, Volume 35, 2010, Pages 78-87.
18. P. Lai, A. Potter, M. Beynon, A. Beresford, Evaluating the efficiency performance of airports using an integrated AHP/DEA-AR technique, J. Transport Policy, Volume 42, 2015, Pages 75-85.
19. F.R. Lima Junior, L. Osiro, L.C.R. Carpinetti, A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection, J. Applied Soft Computing, Volume 21, 2014, Pages 194-209.
20. S. Vinodh, M. Prasanna, N. Hari Prakash, Integrated Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS for selecting the best plastic recycling method: A case study, J. Applied Mathematical Modelling, Volume 38 Number 19-20, 2014, Pages 4662-4672.
21. A.C. Brent, D.E.C. Rogers, T.S.M. Ramabitsa-Siimane, M.B. Rohwer, Application of the analytical hierarchy process to establish health care waste management systems that minimize infection risks in developing countries, European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 181, 2007, Pages 403-424.
22. N. Bryson, and A. Mobolurin, An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 96, 1995, pp. 379-386.
23. J.K.W. Wong, H. Li, Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems, J. Building and Environment, Volume 43, 2008, Pages 108-125.
24. S. Hsueh, M. Yan, Enhancing Sustainable Community Developments A Multi-criteria Evaluation Model for Energy Efficient Project Selection, International Conference on Energy, Environment and Development - ICEED2010, Energy Procedia, Volume 5, 2011, Pages 135-144.
25. Y. Yang, B. Lia, R. Yao, A method of identifying and weighting indicators of energy efficiency assessment in Chinese residential buildings, Energy Policy, Volume 38, Issue 12, December 2010, Pages 7687-7697.
26. H. A. Linstone; M. Turoff, Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, 1975, Addison-Wesley Publishing.
27. S. Hsueh, A Fuzzy Utility-Based Multi-Criteria Model for Evaluating Households' Energy Conservation Performance: A Taiwanese Case Study, Energies 2012, Volume 5, Issue 8, 2818-2834.
28. L. Vidal, F. Marle, J. Bocquet, Using a Delphi process and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects, Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 38, Issue 5, May 2011, Pages 5388-5405.
29. S. H. Alyami, Y. Rezgui, Sustainable building assessment tool development approach, Sustainable Cities and Society, Volume 5, December 2012, Pages 52-62.
30. K. Liu, S. Hsueh, W. Wu, Y. Chen, A DFuzzy-DAHP Decision-Making Model for Evaluating Energy-Saving Design Strategies for Residential Buildings, Energies 2012, Volume 5 Issue 11, Pages 4462-4480.
31. N. Dalkey, O. Helmer, An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts, Management Science, 1963, Volume 9 Issue3, pp. 458-467.
32. J. Pill, The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Volume 5, Issue 1, February 1971, Pages 57-71.
33. N. Singhaputtangkul,S.P. Low,A.L. Teo,B.-G. Hwang, Knowledge-baseddecision support system quality function deployment (KBDSS-QFD) tool for assessment of building envelopes, Automation in Construction, 2013, Volume 35, Pages 314-328.
34. Z. Ma, P. Cooper, D. Daly, L. Ledo, Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art, Energy and Buildings, 2012, Volume 55, Pages 889-902.
35. E Asadia, M.G. da Silva, C.H. Antunesc, L. Diasc, L. Glicksman, Multi-objective optimization for building retrofit: A model using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network and an application, Energy and Buildings, 2014, Volume 81, Pages 444-456.
36. F. Flourentzou, and C.-A. Roulet Elaboration of retrofit scenarios Energy and Buildings 34 2002 185 192
37. D. Ilter, and E. Ergen BIM for building refurbishment and maintenance: current status and research directions Structural Survey 33 3 2015 228 256