Who owns this text?: Plagiarism, authorship, and disciplinary cultures

Who Owns This Text?: Plagiarism, Authorship, and Disciplinary Cultures

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-196

  Haviland, Carol Peterson ^a   Mullin, Joan A ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85056691462     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (114)

1. Atwood, Roger. 2005. A monumental feud. Archaeology 58: 18-25. http://web. ebscohost.com/ehost/ (accessed January 22, 2008).
2. Battiste, Marie, and James (Sákéj) Youngblood Henderson. 2000. Protecting indigenous knowledge and heritage: A global challenge. Saskatoon, SA: Purich Publishing.
3. Bazerman, Charles. 2005. Paying the rent: Languaging particularity and novelty. Plenary address, University of Michigan Sweetland Writing Center Conference, Ann Arbor, MI, September 23-25, 2005.
4. Bazerman, Charles. 2002. What is not institutionally visible does not count: The problem of making activity assessable, accountable and plannable. In Writing selves, writing societies: Research from activity perspectives, ed. Charles Bazerman and David Russell, 428-81. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Mind, Culture, and Activity. http://wac.colostate.edu/selves_societies, (accessed June 6, 2007).
5. Beaufort, Anne. 2007. College writing and beyond: A new framework for university writing instruction. Logan: Utah State University Press.
6. Benthall, Jonathan. 1999. The critique of intellectual property. Anthropology Today 15: 1-3. http://web.ebschohost.com (accessed January 22, 2008).
7. Bergmann, Linda. S. 2000. WAC and the ethos of engineering: Conflict and accommodation. Language and Learning across the Disciplines 4 (1): 4-15.
8. Berkenkotter, Carol, and Thomas N. Huckin. 1995. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Biagioli, Mario. 2003. Rights or rewards? Changing frameworks of scientific authorship. In Scientific authorship: Credit and intellectual property in science, ed. Mario Biagioli and Peter Galison, 253-79. New York: Routledge.
10. Biagioli, Mario, and Peter Galison, eds. 2003. Scientific authorship: Credit and intellectual property in science. New York: Routledge.
11. Birnbaum, Robert. 1988. How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. Birnholtz, Jeremy P. 2006. What does it mean to be an author? The intersection of credit, contribution, and collaboration in science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (13): 1758-70.
13. Blythman, Margo. 2006. E-mail to Plagiarism mailing list, July 8, 2006, plagiarism@ jiscmail.ac.uk.
14. Brent, Doug. 2005. Reinventing WAC (again): The first-year seminar and academic literacy. College Composition and Communication 57:253-76.
15. Buranen, Lise, and Alice. M. Roy, eds. 1999. Perspectives on plagiarism and intellectual property in a postmodern world. Albany: State University of New York Press.
16. Carey, N. H. 1982. From i to commercial products: The paths and pitfalls In From genetic experimentation to biotechnology-the critical transition, ed. W.J. Whelan and Sandra Black, 151-57. Chichester, Sussex: Wiley.
17. Carter, Michael. 2007. Ways of knowing, doing and writing in the disciplines. College Composition and Communication 58:385-418.
18. Choate, Pat. 2005. Hot property: The stealing of ideas in an age of globalization. New York: Knopf.
19. Cohen, Jodi. S. 2006. Words coming back to haunt SIU. Chicago Tribune. July 19, 2006.
20. Cooper, Marilyn M. 1989. Why are we talking about discourse communities? Or, foundationalism rears its ugly head once more. In Writing as social action, ed. Marilyn M. Cooper and Michael Holzman. Portsmouth NH: Boynton /Cook.
21. Couzin, Jennifer. 2006. Breakdown of the year: Scientific fraud. Science vol. 314, no. 5 407, (December 22, 2006 p. 1853. Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org.
22. Cronin, Blaise. 2005. The hand of science: Academic writing and its rewards. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press. Vol. 52 no. 7, May 2001, pp558-69.
23. Cronin, Blaise. 2001. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52 (May): 558-69.
24. Dalton, Rex. 2005. Obesity expert owns up to million-dollar crime. Nature 434 p. 424. Print published March 24, 2005, published online March 23, 2005.
25. Davis, Michael. 1991. Who can teach workplace ethics? Teaching Philosophy 13 (1): 21-38.
26. DeLong, James V. 2002. Defending intellectual property. In Copy fights: The future of intellectual property in the information age, ed. Adam Thierer and Clyde Wayne Crews, 17-36. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
27. Dolin, Kieran. 2007. Critical introduction to law and literature. Leiden: Cambridge University Press.
28. Ede, Lisa, and Andrea A. Lunsford. 1990. Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
29. Fisher, W. 2001. Theories of intellectual property. In New Essays in the legal and political theory of property, ed. S. Munzer. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/tfisher/iptheory.pdf (accessed June 7, 2007).
30. Fox, Catherine. 2006. Glass artists throw stones over ownership of ideas. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. http://www.accessatlanta.com/arts/content/ arts/stories/0714lvchihuly.html (accessed June 7, 2007).
31. Galison, Peter. 2003. The collective author. In Scientific authorship: Credit and intellectual property in science, ed. Mario Biagioli and Peter Galison, 325-55. New York: Routledge.
32. Gladwell, Malcolm. 2004. Something borrowed: Should a charge of plagiarism ruin your life? The New Yorker, November 22. http://www.newyorker.com/ archive/2004/11/22/041122fa_fact (accessed February 12, 2008).
33. Gottlieb, Alma. 1995. Beyond the lonely anthropologist: Collaboration in research and writing. American Anthropologist 97:21-26.
34. Graff, Gerald. 1992. Beyond the culture wars: How teaching the conflicts can revitalize American education. New York: Norton.
35. Greene, Mott. 2007. The demise of the lone author. Nature. 450 (December 20, 2007): 1165.
36. Gudeman, Stephen, and Alberto Rivera. 1995. From car to house (del coche a la casa). American Anthropologist vol. 97:2, June 1995, pp242-50 242-50.
37. Hagstrom, Warren O. 1965. The scientific community. New York: Basic Books.
38. Hall, Jonathan. 2005. Plagiarism across the curriculum: How academic communities can meet the challenge of the undocumented writer. Across the disciplines. http://wac.colostate/atd/articles/hall2005.cfm (accessed June 7, 2007).
39. Hamilikis, Yannis. 2004. Comment in response to Nicholas, George P., and Kelly P. Bannister. Copyrighting the past? Emerging intellectual property rights issues in archaeology. Current Anthropology 45:327-50.
40. Haviland, Carol Peterson, and Joan A. Mullin. 1999. Writing centers and intellectual property: Are faculty members and students differently entitled? In Perspectives on plagiarism and intellectual property in a postmodern world, ed. Lise Buranen and Alice M. Roy, 169-81. Albany: State University of New York Press.
41. Hesse, Monica. 2008. People are doing double-takes, and taking action, as web snapshots are nabbed for commercial use. The Washington Post, January 9, C1.
42. Hirsch, Eric. 2002. Malinowski's intellectual property. Anthropology Today 18:1-2.
43. Howard, Rebecca Moore. 1995. Plagiarism, authorship, and the academic death penalty. College English 57:788-805.
44. Howard, Rebecca Moore. 1999. Standing in the shadow of giants: Plagiarists, authors, collaborators. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
45. Howard, Rebecca Moore. 2001. Forget about policing plagiarism: Just teach. Chronicle of Higher Education, November 16, 48:B-24.
46. Howard, Rebecca Moore, and Amy E. Robillard, eds. Pluralizing plagiarism: identities, contexts, pedagogies. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 2008.
47. Hyland, Kenneth. 1999. Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics 20 (September): 341-67.
48. Hyland, Kenneth. 2005. Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies. 7 May 1, 2005 vol. 7 #2: 173-92.
49. Ilakovac, Vesna, Kristina Fister, Matko Marusic, and Ana Marusic. Reliability of disclosure forms of author's contributions. Canadian Medical Association Journal 176 (January 2007) vol. 176 #1: 41-46.
50. Jaszi, Peter, and Martha Woodmansee. 2003. Beyond authorship: Refiguring rights in traditional culture and bioknowledge. In Scientific authorship: Credit and intellectual property in science, ed. Mario Biagioli and Peter Galison, 195-223. New York: Routledge.
51. Johnson-Eilola, Johndan. August 15, 1998. Intellectual property: Questions and answers. E-mail to http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/3.1/binder2. html?coverweb/johndan.html. (accessed August 23, 2008).
52. Kaindl, Robert. 2007. Dale Chihuly, Chihuly Inc. and Portland Press vs. Robert Kaindl, Kaindl Art Glass Production, Brian Rubino: Lawsuits, Countersuits, Answers, Exhibits and Request for Admissions. http://www. robertkaindl. com/Lawsuit.htm (accessed January 4, 2007).
53. Kearns, Mary Ellen. February 15, 2007. Plagiarism. Posting to listserv EATAWCONF@ listserv.hum.ku.dk.
54. Kellehar, Susan, and Sheila Farr. 2006. Chihuly turns up the heat on competing glass artists. Seattle Times. http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/ archive/?date=20060808$slug=ch.huly08 (accessed June 7, 2008).
55. Kennedy, Elizabeth Lapovsky. 1995. In pursuit of connection: Reflections on collaborative work. American Anthropologist 97:21-26.
56. Kohl, Philip L., Aleksandr Formozov, Anthony E. Marks, A. Derevyanko, and Y. E. Demidenko. 1996. On proprietary rights in archaeology: Some unresolved issues. Current Anthropology 37:S113-27.
57. Kolln, Martha. 2007. Rhetorical grammar: Grammatical choices, rhetorical effects. 5th ed. New York: Pearson Education.
58. Lafollette, Marcel C. 1992. Stealing into print: Fraud, plagiarism, and misconduct in scientific publishing. Berkeley: University of California Press.
59. Lamb, Brian. 2007. Dr. Mashup, or, why educators should learn to stop worrying and love the remix. http://connect.educause.edu/hibrary/ EDUCAUSE+Review/DrMashuporWhyEducatorsSho/4459?tim e=121953351 (accessed February 23, 2008).
60. Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
61. Lessig, Lawrence. 2004. Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. New York: Penguin.
62. Lessig, Lawrence. 2005. Intellectual property: key issues. Address presented at the Conference on Composition and Communication, San Francisco, CA, March 16, 2005.
63. Lethem, Jonathan. 2007. The ecstasy of influence. Harper's Magazine, February, 59-71.
64. Lillis, Theresa M. 2001. Student writing: access, regulation, desire. New York: Routledge.
65. Liptak, Adam. 2006. Sports artist sued for mix of crimson and tide. The New York Times, November 12. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/12/us/12artist. html (accessed January 6, 2008).
66. Lunsford, Andrea A. 1996. Intellectual property in an age of information: What is at stake for composition studies? In Composition in the twenty-first century: Crisis and change, ed. Lynn Z. Bloom, Donald A. Daiker, and Edward M. White, 261-72. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
67. Mallon, Thomas. 1989. Stolen words: Forays into the origins and ravages of plagiarism. New York: Ticknor and Fields.
68. Martin, Brian. 1994. Plagiarism: A misplaced emphasis. Journal of Information Ethics 3:36-47.
69. A matter of trust. 2006. Nature Immunology 7 (10): 1005.
70. McCook, Alison. 2007. New details in Korean plagiarism case: Scientists continue to scuffle over blame and responsibility and are taking their grievances to court. The Scientist. http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/53061 (accessed October 10, 2007).
71. McLeod, Kembrew. 2005. Freedom of expression®: Overzealous copyright bozos and other enemies of creativity. New York: Doubleday.
72. McSherry, Corynne. 2001. Who owns academic work? Battling for control of intellectual property. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73. Merton, Robert K. 1973. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
74. Mervis, Jeffrey. 1989. Bitter suit over research work asks 'Who deserves the credit?' The Scientist 3 (April 17): 4-5. http://www.The-Scientist.com/article/ display/9273 (accessed August 23, 2008).
75. Moffatt, Barton, and Carl Elliott. 2007. Ghost marketing: Pharmaceutical companies and ghostwritten journal articles. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine vol. 50 (Winter): 18-31.
76. Nelkin, Dorothy. 1984. Science as intellectual property. New York: Macmillan.
77. Nicholas, George P., and Kelly P. Bannister. 2004. Copyrighting the past? Emerging intellectual property rights issues in archaeology. Current Anthropology 45:327-50.
78. Nicholas, George P., and Kelly P. Bannister. 2004. Reply to On intellectual property rights and archaeology. Current Anthropology 45:527-29.
79. Nicholas, George P., and Julie Hollowell. 2004. Intellectual property issues in archaeology? Anthropology News 45:345-50.
80. O'Rourke, Meghan. 2007. The copycat syndrome: Plagiarists at work. Slate, January 11. http://www.slate.com/id/2157435 (accessed June 7, 2007).
81. Orr, Susan, Margo Blythman, and Joan A. Mullin. 2005. Designing your writing/ writing your design: Art and design students talk about the process of writing and the process of design. Across the disciplines. December 3. http:// wac.colostate.edu/atd/visual/orr_blythman_mullin.cfm (accessed June 7, 2007).
82. Price, Margaret. 2002. Beyond 'gotcha!': Situating plagiarism policy and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication 54:88-115.
83. Prior, Paul, and Jody Shipka. 2003. Chronotopic lamination: Tracing the contours. In Writing selves/writing societies, ed. Charles Bazerman and David Russell,180-238. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Mind, Culture, and Activity. http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies (accessed June 7, 2007).
84. Randall, Marilyn. 1999. Imperial plagiarism. In Perspectives on plagiarism and intellectual property in a postmodern world, ed. Lise Buranen and Alice M. Roy, 129-40. Albany: State University of New York Press.
85. Rennie, Drummond, Veronica Yank, and Linda Emanuel. 1997. When authorship fails: A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA 278 (August 20, 1997): 579-85.
86. Roberts, Tim S. 2008. Student plagiarism in an online world: problems and solutions. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
87. Russell, David, and Arturo Yañez. 2003. 'Big picture people rarely become historians': Genre systems and the contradictions of general education. In Writing selves/writing societies: Research from activity perspectives, ed. Charles Bazerman and David Russell, 331-62. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Mind, Culture, and Activity. http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies (accessed June 6, 2007).
88. Schmaus, Warren. 1983. Fraud and the norms of science. Science, Technology, & Human Values vol. 8 (Autumn 1983): 12-22.
89. Shanks, Hershel. 1999. When scholars call in the lawyers. Biblical Archaeology Review 25:70-71.
90. Slaughter, Sheila, and Larry L. Leslie. 1997. Academic capitalism: Politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
91. Smith, Claire. 2004. On intellectual property rights and archaeology. Current Anthropology 45:527.
92. Suehle, Ruth. 2007. (Mis)understandings of the words 'intellectual property.' Red Hat Magazine, October 19. http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2007/10/19/ misunderstandings-of-the-words-%e2%80%9cintellectual-property% e2%80%9d/#more-514 (accessed January 6, 2008).
93. Swanson, Kara. 2007. Biotech in court: A legal lesson on the unity of science. Social Studies of Science 37 (June): 357-84.
94. Thaiss, Chris, and Terry Zawacki. 2006. Engaged writers, dynamic disciplines: Research on the academic writing life. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/ Heinemann.
95. Tolme, Paul. 2008. Move over, 'meerkat manor.' Newsweek, January 15. http:// www.newsweek.com/id/94543 (accessed February 23, 2008).
96. Ullman, Ellen. 1997. Getting close to the machine: Technophilia and its discontents. San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books.
97. Unger, Katherine, and Jennifer Couzin. 2006. Even retracted papers endure. Science 312 (April 7):40-41.
98. United States Copyright Office. 2007 Copyright registration for works of the visual arts, Circular 40.
99. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Glossary. http://www.uspto.gov (accessed October 10, 2007).
100. Vaidhyanathan, Siva. 2001. Copyrights and copywrongs: The rise of intellectual property and how it threatens creativity. New York: New York University Press.
101. Valentine, Karen. 2006. Plagiarism as literacy practice: Recognizing and rethinking ethical binaries. College Composition and Communication 58 (1): 89-109.
102. Vorsino, Mary. 2007. Hawaii artist prevails in lawsuit over photo. The Honolulu Advertiser, November 1, 2007. http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/ (accessed January 6, 2008).
103. Weathers,Winston. 1980. An alternate style: Options in composition. Rochelle Park, NJ: Heinneman.
104. Weiner, Joseph J. 2007. Historians in trouble: Plagiarism, fraud and politics in the ivory tower. New York: New Press.
105. Westbrook, Steve. 2007. Innovators or outlaws: Constructions of student identity in new media handbooks. Presentation at annual convention of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, New York.
106. Wilford, John Noble. 1991. Temple Mount in Jerusalem beset by new dispute over archaeology. The New York Times, September 3, 1991. http:// query.nytimes.com//.html?res=9D0CE7DD123BF930A3575AC0A9679582 60&n=Top%2FNews%2FScience%2FTopics%2FArchaeology%20and%20 Anthropology (accessed October 10, 2007).
107. Woodmansee, Martha. 1984. The genius and the copyright: Economic and legal conditions of the emergence of the 'author.' Eighteenth Century Studies 17:425.
108. Woodmansee, Martha. 1994. On the author effect: Recovering collectivity. In Construction of authorship: Textual appropriation in law and literature, ed. Martha Woodmansee and Peter Jaszi, 15-28. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
109. Woolf, Patricia. 1981. Fraud in science: How much, how serious?" The Hastings Center Report, Vol. 11, No. 5 (Oct., 1981), pp. 9-14, Garrison NY.
110. Wray, K. Brad. 2002. The Epistemic Significance of Collaborative Research. Philosophy of Science 69 (March): 150-68.
111. Wray, K. Brad. 2006. Scientific authorship in the age of collaborative research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37:505-14.
112. Youra, Steven. 2008. Who wrote this text: Plagiarism and shared authorship across disciplines. Ninth Annual Writing Across the Curriculum Conference, Austin, TX, May 29-31, 2008.
113. Zemer, Lior. 2007. The idea of authorship in copyright. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
114. Zuckerman, Harriet. 1968. Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: A study of social symbolism and its ambiguity." American Journal of Sociology 74:276-91.