Exploring physical wetland vulnerability of Atreyee river basin in India and Bangladesh using logistic regression and fuzzy logic approaches

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 98, Issue , 2019, Pages 251-265

  Saha, Tamal Kanti ^a   Pal, Swades ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOUR BANGA   (India)

Author keywords

Fuzzy logic; Logistic regression and hydraulic model; Physical wetland vulnerability

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; COMPUTER CIRCUITS; ECOSYSTEMS; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOODS; FUZZY LOGIC; HYDRAULIC MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RIVERS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

FUZZY LOGIC APPROACH; KAPPA COEFFICIENT; LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS; NORMALIZED DIFFERENCES; PHYSICAL WETLAND VULNERABILITY; RECEIVER OPERATING CURVES; SERVICE CAPABILITY; WETLAND ECOSYSTEM;

WETLANDS;

AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION; EXPLORATION; FLOODPLAIN; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RIVER BASIN; VULNERABILITY; WETLAND;

BANGLADESH; INDIA;

EID: 85056218205     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Abdu-Raheem, K.A., Exploring the role of agricultural extension in promoting biodiversity conservation in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Syst. 38:9 (2014), 1015–1032, 10.1080/21683 565.2014.89928 3.
2. Acreman, M., Harding, R., Sullivan, C., et al. Review of Hydrological Issues on Water Storage in International Development. 2009, Report to Centre for Ecology and Hydrology & British Geological Survey, Wallingford, UK.
3. Adekola, O., Mitchell, G., The Niger Delta wetlands: threats to ecosystem services, their importance to dependent communities and possible management measures. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci., Ecosyst. Serv. Manage. 7:1 (2011), 50–68, 10.1080/21513732.2011.603138.
4. Adel, M.M., Upstream water piracy, the strongest weapon of cornering a downstream nation. Environ. Ecol. Res. 1:3 (2013), 85–128 https://doi.org/10.13189/eer.2013.01030 1.
5. Anbalagan, R., Kumar, R., Lakshmanan, K., Parida, S., Neethu, S., Landslide hazard zonation mapping using frequency ratio and fuzzy logic approach, a case study of Lachung Valley, Sikkim. Geoenviron. Disasters, 2(1), 2015, 6.
6. Bai, J., Cui, B., Chen, B., Zhang, K., Deng, W., Gao, H., Xiao, R., Spatial distribution and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in surface sediments from a typical plateau lake wetland, China. Ecol. Modell. 222:2 (2011), 301–306, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.12.002.
7. Baldi, G., Guerschman, J.P., Paruelo, J.M., Characterizing fragmentation in temperate South America grasslands. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 116:3–4 (2006), 197–208.
8. Bassi, N., Kumar, M.D., Sharma, A., Pardha-Saradhi, P., Status of wetlands in India: a review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies. J. Hydrol.: Reg. Stud. 2 (2014), 1–19, 10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.07.001.
9. Basu, T., Pal, S., Exploring landslide susceptibility zones by analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for the Gish River basin, West Bengal, India. Spat. Inf. Res. 25 (2017), 665–675, 10.1007/s41324- 017-0134-2.
10. Bates, B., Kundzewicz, Z., Wu, S., Climate change and water. Intergovernmental Panel on. 2008, Climate Change Secretariat.
11. Bavaghar, M.P., Deforestation modelling using logistic regression and GIS. J. For. Sci 61 (2015), 193–199.
12. Borro, M., Morandeira, N., Salvia, M., Minotti, P., Perna, P., Kandus, P., Mapping shallow lakes in a large South American floodplain: a frequency approach on multitemporal Landsat TM/ETM data. J. Hydrol. 512 (2014), 39–52, 10.1016/j.jhydr ol.2014.02.057.
13. Bregt, A.K., Wopereis, M.C.S., Comparison of complexity measures for choropleth maps. The Cartographic J. 27:2 (1990), 85–91.
14. Champatiray, P.K., Dimri, S., Lakhera, R.C., Sati, S., Fuzzy-based method for landslide hazard assessment in active seismic zone of Himalaya. Landslides 4 (2007), 101–111.
15. Chau, K.W., A split-step particle swarm optimization algorithm in river stage forecasting. J. Hydrol. 346:3–4 (2007), 131–135, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.004.
16. Cheng, C.T., et al. Multiple criteria rainfall-runoff model calibration using a parallel genetic algorithm in a cluster of computer. Hydrol. Sci. J. 50:6 (2005), 1069–1087, 10.1623/hysj.2005.50.6.1069.
17. Cowardin, R.L., Laurer, G.J., International business machines corporation. Wand for reading optically encoded graphic symbols. U.S. Patent, 3, 1976 (pp. 983–389).
18. Das, R.T., Pal, S., Investigation of the principal vectors of wetland loss in Barind tract of West Bengal. Geo Journal, 2017, 10.1007/s1070 8-017-9821-8.
19. Das, R.T., Pal, S., Exploring geospatial changes of wetland in different hydrological paradigms using water presence frequency approach in Barind Tract of West Bengal. Spat. Inf. Res., 1–13, 2017, 10.1007/s41324-017-0114-6.
20. Day, J.W., Christian, R.R., Boesch, D.M., Yáñez-Arancibia, A., Morris, J., Twilley, R.R., Schaffner, L., Consequences of climate change on the ecogeomorphology of coastal wetlands. Estuaries Coasts 31:3 (2008), 477–491.
21. Debnath, A.C., Changing Course of Kameng River in the Lower Reaches. North Eastern Hill University. 2007, Department of Geography, India.
22. Ercanoglu, M., Gokceoglu, C., Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach. Environ. Geol. 41:6 (2002), 720–730.
23. Erwin, K.L., Wetlands and global climate change: the role of wetland restoration in a changing world. Wetlands Ecol. Manage., 17(1), 2009, 71, 10.1007/s11273-008-9119-1.
24. Finlayson, C.M., Davidson, N.C., 1999. Global review of wetland resources and priorities for wetland inventory. Preface iv Summary Report, 15.
25. Fotovatikhah, F.H., et al. Survey of Computational Intelligence as Basis to Big Flood Management: challenges, research directions and Future Work. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 12:1 (2018), 411–437, 10.1080/19942060.2018.1448896.
26. Gain, A.K., Giupponi, C., A dynamic assessment of water scarcity risk in the Lower Brahmaputra River Basin: an integrated approach. Ecol. Indic. 48 (2015), 120–131, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.034.
27. Hiestermann, J., Rivers-Moore, N., Predictive modelling of wetland occurrence in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 111:7–8 (2015), 1–10.
28. Hoque, M.A., Burgess, W.G., 14 C dating of deep groundwater in the Bengal Aquifer System, Bangladesh: implications for aquifer anisotropy, recharge sources and sustainability. J. Hydrol. 444 (2012), 209–220, 10.1016/j.jhydr ol.2012.04.022.
29. Hossain, M.A., Nahiduzzaman, M., Sayeed, M.A., Azim, M.E., Wahab, M.A., Olin, P.G., The Chalan beel in Bangladesh: habitat and biodiversity degradation, and implications for future management. Lakes Reservoirs Res. Manage. 14:1 (2009), 3–19.
30. Huang, C., Chen, Y., Wu, J., DEM-based modification of pixelswapping algorithm for enhancing floodplain inundation mapping. Int. J. Remote Sens. 35:1 (2014), 365–381, 10.1016/j.jhydrol. 2009.02.052.
31. Huising, E.J., Wetland monitoring in Uganda. Int. Archives Photogramm. Remote Sens. 34:6/W6 (2002), 127–135.
32. Jiang, W., Lv, J., Wang, C., et al. Marsh wetland degradation risk assessment and change analysis: a case study in the Zoige Plateau, China. Ecol. Indic. 82 (2017), 316–326, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.059.
33. Johnson, M., Reich, P., Mac Nally, R., Bird assemblages of a fragmented agricultural landscape and the relative importance of vegetation structure and landscape pattern. Wildl. Res. 34:3 (2007), 185–193.
34. Junk, W.J., Bayley, P.B., Sparks, R.E., The flood pulse concept in river flood plain systems. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquatic Sci. 106:1 (1989), 110–127.
35. Kadavi, P.R., Lee, C.W., Lee, S., Application of ensemble-based machine learning models to landslide susceptibility mapping. Remote Sens., 10, 2018, 1252, 10.3390/rs10081252.
36. Karim, F., Petheram, C., Marvanek, S., et al. Impact of climate change on floodplain inundation and hydrological connectivity between wetlands and rivers in tropical river catchment. Hydrol. Process. 30 (2016), 1574–1593, 10.1002/hyp.10714.
37. Khatun, S., Pal, S., Categorization of morphometric surface through morphometric diversity analysis in Kushkarani river basin of Eastern India. Asian J. PhysChemSci 2:1 (2017), 1–19, 10.9734/AJOPACS/2017/31098.
38. Knebl, M.R., Yang, Z.L., Hutchison, K., Maidment, D.R., Regional scale flood modeling using NEXRAD rainfall, GIS, and HEC-HMS/RAS: a case study for the San Antonio River Basin Summer 2002 storm event. J. Environ. Manage. 75:4 (2005), 325–336.
39. Kulkarni, A.T., Mohanty, J., Eldho, T.I., Rao, E.P., Mohan, B.K., A web GIS based integrated flood assessment modeling tool for coastal urban watersheds. Comput. Geosci. 64 (2014), 7–14.
40. Lee, S., Pradhan, B., Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides 4:1 (2007), 33–41.
41. Lee, S., Sambath, T., Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Environ. Geol. 50:6 (2006), 847–855.
42. Lehner, B., Döll, P., Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands. J. Hydrol. 296:1–4 (2004), 1–22.
43. Liu, J., Zhang, Q., Hu, Y., Regional differences of China's urban expansion from late 20th to early 21st century based on remote sensing information. Chin. Geog. Sci. 22:1 (2012), 1–14.
44. Malekmohammadi, B., Jahanishakib, F., Vulnerability assessment of wetland landscape ecosystem services using driver-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) model. Ecol. Indic. 82 (2017), 293–303, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.060.
45. McCarigal, K., Marks, B.J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351.
46. McFeeters, S.K., The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. Int. J. Remote Sens. 17:710.1080/01431169608948714 (1996), 1425–1432.
47. Melly, B.L., Schael, D.M., Rivers-Moore, N., Gama, P.T., Mapping ephemeral wetlands: manual digitisation and logistic regression modelling in Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality, South Africa. Wetlands Ecol. Manag. 25:3 (2017), 313–330.
48. Meten, M., Prakash Bhandary, N., Yatabe, R., Effect of landslide factor combinations on the prediction accuracy of landslide susceptibility maps in the blue Nile gorge of central Ethiopia. Geoenviron. Disasters 12 (2015), 1355–1372, 10.1186/s40677-015-0016-7.
49. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment., Living beyond our means: Natural assets and human wellbeing. 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
50. Miller, F., Osbahr, H., Boyd, E., Thomalla, F., Bharwani, S., Ziervogel, G., Hinkel, J., Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts?. Ecol. Soc., 15(3), 2010.
51. Mitsch, W.J., Gosselink, J.G., Wetlands. 2nd ed., 1993, Van NostrandReinhold, New York, NY, USA.
52. Mohanta, T., 2016. Studies on present status of fish availability in river atrai with special emphasis on Cirrhinusreba and Aspidopariamorar, and socio-economic status of fishermen in Balurghat (WB) (Doctoral dissertation, Kolkata).
53. Mondal, D., Pal, S., Monitoring dual-season hydrological dynamics of seasonally flooded wetlands in the lower reach of Mayurakshi River, Eastern India. Geocarto Int., 2016, 10.1080/10106049.2016.1240720.
54. Mondal, D., Pal, S., Evolution of wetlands in lower reaches of Bagmari-Bansloi-Pagla rivers: A study using multi dated images and maps. Current Science 112:11 (2017), 2263–2272, 10.18520/cs/v112/i11/2263-2272.
55. Mondal, S., Mandal, S., Application of frequency ratio (FR) model in spatial prediction of landslides in the Balason river basin, Darjeeling Himalaya. Spat Inf. Res. 25 (2017), 337–350, 10.1007/s41324-017-0101-y.
56. Murungweni, F.M., Effect of land use change on quality of urban wetlands: a case of monavale wetland in Harare. GeoinforGeostat: An Overview S1, 2013, 10.4172/2327-4581.s1-015.
57. Nindi, S.J., Maliti, H., Bakari, S., Kija, H., Machoke, M., 2014. Conflicts over land and water resources in the Kilombero Valley floodplain. Tanzania. https://doi.org/10.14989/189720.
58. Pal, S., Impact of Massanjore Dam on hydro-geomorphological modification of Mayurakshi River, Eastern India. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 18:3 (2015), 921–944, 10.1007/s10668-015-9679-1.
59. Pal, S., Impact of water diversion on hydrological regime of the Atreyee river of Indo-Bangladesh. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 14:4 (2016), 459–475, 10.1080/15715124.2016.1194282.
60. Pal, S., Impact of Tilpara barrage on backwater reach of Kushkarni River: a tributary of Mayurakshi River. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 2016, 1–28, 10.1007/s10668-016-9833-4.
61. Pal, S., Akoma, O.C., Water scarcity in wetland area within kandi block of West Bengal: a hydro-ecological assessment. Ethiopian J. Environ. Stud. Manag., 2009, 10.4314/ejesm.v2i3.48260.
62. Pal, S., Osoundu, C.A., Water scarcity in wetland area within Kandi block of West Bengal: a hydro-ecological assessment. Ethiop J Environ Stud Manage 2:3 (2009), 1–17, 10.4314/ejesm.v2i3.48260.
63. Pal, S., Saha, T.K., Identifying dam-induced wetland changes using an 4 inundation frequency approach: The case of the Atreyee river basin of Indo-Bangladesh. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 163 (2017), 1–16, 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2017.11.001.
64. Pal, S., Talukdar, S., Application of frequency ratio and logistic regression models for assessing physical wetland vulnerability in Punarbhaba river basin of Indo-Bangladesh. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess.: An Int. J., 2018, 1–21.
65. Poff, N.L., Brinson, M.M., Day, J.W., Aquatic ecosystems and global climate change. Pew Center on Global Clim. Change, Arlington, VA 44 (2002), 1–36.
66. Pradhan, B., Application of an advanced fuzzy logic model for landslide susceptibility analysis. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 3:3 (2010), 370–381.
67. Rashid, B., Islam, S.U., Islam, B., Drainage characteristics and evolution of the Barind tract, Bangladesh. Am. J. Earth Sci. 1:4 (2014), 86–98.
68. Rashid, M.B., Islam, M.B., Sultan-Ul-Islam, M., Causes of acute water scarcity in the Barind Tract, Bangladesh. Int. J. Econ. Environ. Geol., 2013, 5–14.
69. Rasyid, A.R., Bhandary, N.P., Yatabe, R., Performance of frequency ratio and logistic regression model in creating GIS based landslides susceptibility map at Lompobattang Mountain, Indonesia. Geoenviron. Disasters, 3, 2016, 19, 10.1186/s40677-016-0053-x.
70. Rowland, J.C., Dietrich, W.E., Day, G., Parker, G., Formation and maintenance of single-thread tie channels entering floodplain lakes: Observations from three diverse river systems. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf., 114(F2), 2009.
71. Saha, T.K., Pal, S., Emerging conflict between agriculture extension and physical existence of wetland in post-dam period in Atreyee River basin of Indo-Bangladesh. Environ. Dev. Sustain, 2018, 10.1007/s10668-018-0099-x.
72. Sami, M., Shiekhdavoodi, M.J., Pazhohanniya, M., et al. Environmental comprehensive assessment of agricultural systems at the farm level using fuzzy logic: A case study in cane farms in Iran. Environ. Model Software 58 (2014), 95–108, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.02.014.
73. Sarkar, S., Parihar, S.M., Dutta, A., Fuzzy risk assessment modelling of East Kolkata Wetland Area: a remote sensing and GIS based approach. Environ. Model Software 75 (2016), 105–118, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.003.
74. Sharma, B., Rasul, G., Chettri, N., The economic value of wetland ecosystem services: evidence from the Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve. Nepal. Ecosyst. Serv. 12 (2015), 84–93, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.007.
75. Solaimani, K., Mousavi, S.Z., Kavian, A., Landslide susceptibility mapping based on frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Arab. J. Geosci. 6 (2013), 2557–2569, 10.1007/s12517-012- 0526-5.
76. Sun, F., Sun, W., Chen, J., Gong, P., Comparison and improvement of methods for identifying water bodies in remotely sensed imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 33:21 (2012), 6854–6875, 10.1080/01431161.2012.692829.
77. Süzen, M.L., Doyuran, V., A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Environ. Geol. 45:5 (2004), 665–679.
78. Talukdar, S., Pal, S., Impact of dam on flow regime and flood plain modification in Punarbhaba river basin of Indo-Bangladesh barind tract. Water Conserv. Sci. Eng., 2017, 10.1007/s4110 1-017-0025-3.
79. Talukdar, S., Pal, S., Impact of dam on inundation regime of flood plain wetland of Punarbhaba river basin of barind tract of Indo-Bangladesh. Int. Soil and Water Conserv. Res. 5 (2017), 109–121, 10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.05.003.
80. Taormina, R., et al. Neural network river forecasting through baseflow separation and binary-coded swarm optimization. J. Hydrol. 529:3 (2015), 1788–1797, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.008.
81. Ten Brink, P., Badura, T., Farmer, A., Russi, D., The Economics of Ecosystem and Biodiversity for Water and Wetlands: A Briefing Note. 2012, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London, 9.
82. Thomas, R.F., Kingsford, R.T., Lu, Y., Cox, S.J., Sims, N.C., Hunter, S.J., Mapping inundation in the heterogeneous floodplain wetlands of the Macquarie Marshes, using Landsat Thematic Mapper. J. Hydrol. 524 (2015), 194–213, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.029.
83. Tockner, K., Pusch, M., Borchardt, D., Lorang, M.S., Multiple stressors in coupled river–floodplain ecosystems. Freshw. Biol. 55:s1 (2010), 135–151, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02371.x.
84. Townshend, J.R., Justice, C.O., Analysis of the dynamics of African vegetation using the normalized difference vegetation index. Int. J. Remote Sens. 7:11 (1986), 1435–1445, 10.1080/01431168608948946.
85. Turner, M.G., O'Neill, R.V., Gardner, R.H., Milne, B.T., Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol. 3:3–4 (1989), 153–162.
86. Turner, R.K., Van Den Bergh, J.C., Söderqvist, T., Barendregt, A., Van Der Straaten, J., Maltby, E., Van Ierland, E.C., Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecol. Econ. 35:1 (2000), 7–23.
87. Verhoeven, J.T., Beltman, B., Whigham, D.F., Bobbink, R., Wetland functioning in a changing world: implications for natural resources management. Wetlands and Natural Resource Management, 2006, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1–12, 10.1007/978-3-540-33187-2_1.
88. Wang, B., Chen, Z., 2010. A GIS-based fuzzy aggregation modeling approach for air pollution risk assessment. In Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), 2010 Seventh International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 957-961). IEEE.
89. Wang, M., Qi, S., Zhang, X., Wetland loss and degradation in the Yellow River Delta, Shandong Province of China. Environ. Earth Sci. 67:1 (2012), 185–188.
90. Wang, P., Li, Z., Gao, W., Rapid shrinking of glaciers in the Middle Qilian Mountain region of Northwest China during the last50 years. J. Earth Sci. 22:4 (2011), 539–548, 10.1007/s1258 3-011-0195-4.
91. Wang, W.C., et al. Assessment of river water quality based on theory of variable fuzzy sets and fuzzy binary comparison method. Water Resour. Manage. 28:12 (2014), 4183–4200, 10.1007/s11269-014-0738-4.
92. Woodruff, J.D., Martini, A.P., Elzidani, E.Z., Naughton, T.J., Kekacs, D.J., MacDonald, D.G., Off-river water bodies on tidal rivers: Human impact on rates of infilling and the accumulation of pollutants. Geomorphology 184 (2013), 38–50.
93. Wu, C.L., et al. Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural network coupled with singular spectrum analysis. J. Hydrol. 399:3–4 (2011), 394–409, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.017.
94. WWF., 2006. Conservation of High Altitude Wetlands in the Himalayas. Report of the Fourth Regional Workshop. Capacity building for high altitude wetlands conservation and management. New Delhi, India, 27-29 June 2006. http://www.ramsar.org/pd.
95. Yin, Y., Xu, Y., Chen, Y., Relationship between changes of river–lake networks and water levels in typical regions of Taihu Lake Basin, China. Chin. Geog. Sci., 2012, 10.1007/s1176 9-012-0570-9.
96. Zadeh, L.A., Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control, 8(3), 1965 338e353.
97. Zhang, R., Zhang, X., Yang, J., Yuan, H., Wetland ecosystem stability evaluation by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach in Yinchuan Plain, China. Math. Comput. Modell. 57:3–4 (2013), 366–374.
98. Ziaul, S., Pal, S., Estimating wetland insecurity index for Chatra wetland adjacent English Bazar Municipality of West Bengal. Spatial Inf. Res. 25:6 (2017), 813–823.