Exploring geospatial changes of wetland in different hydrological paradigms using water presence frequency approach in Barind Tract of West Bengal

Spatial Information Research

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 467-479

  Das, Rajib Tarani ^a   Pal, Swades ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOUR BANGA   (India)

Author keywords

Barind tract; Discharge regulations; Hydrological paradigms; NDWI; Seasonal wetlands; Water presence frequency; Wetland vulnerability

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC THERMODYNAMICS; DAMS; STREAM FLOW; WETLANDS;

BARIND TRACT; CONDITION; DISCHARGE REGULATION; FREQUENCY APPROACH; HYDROLOGICAL PARADIGM; NDWI; SEASONAL WETLAND; WATER PRESENCE FREQUENCY; WEST BENGAL; WETLAND VULNERABILITY;

RIVERS;

EID: 85041781042     PISSN: 23663286     EISSN: 23663294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s41324-017-0114-6     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Curie, F., Gaillard, S., Ducharne, A., & Bendjoudi, H. (2007). Geomorphological methods to characterise wetlands at the scale of the Seine watershed. Elsevier Science Direct, 375, 59–68.
2. Das, R. T., & Pal, S. (2016). Identification of water bodies from multispectral landsat imageries of Barind Tract of West Bengal. International Journal of Innovative Research and Review, 4(1), 26–37.
3. Sather, J. H. (1976). National wetland classification and inventory workshop, July 20–23, 1975, College Park, Md. University of Maryland. In Proceedings: Washington, D.C., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report, (p. 358).
4. Adam, P. (1992). Wetlands and wetland boundaries: Problems, expectations, perceptions and reality. Wetlands (Australia), 11, 60–67.
5. Cowardin, L. M., Carter, V., Golet, F. C., & LaRoe, E. T. (1979). Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report FWS/OBS-79/31 (p. 131).
6. Bassia, N., Kumar, M. D., Sharma, A., & Saradhi, P. (2014). Status of wetlands in India: A review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies. Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies, 2(1), 1–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.07.001
7. Zedler, J. B., & Kercher, S. (2005). Wetland resources: Status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annual Review Environment Resources, 30, 39–74. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144248
8. Pal, S. (2015). Impact of Massanjore Dam on hydro-geomorphological modification of Mayurakshi River, Eastern India. Environment Development and Sustainability, Springer Science, 17(3), 1573–2975.
9. Yang, W., Liu, Y., Ou, C., & Gabor, S. (2016). Examining water quality effects of riparian wetland loss and restoration scenarios in a southern Ontario watershed. Journal of Environmental Management Elsevier, 174, 26–34.
10. Ward, J. V., & Stanford, J. A. (1995). Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 11, 105–119. DOI: 10.1002/rrr.3450110109
11. Rees, C. B. V., & Reed, J. M. (2014). Wetland loss in Hawai’i since human settlement. Wetlands Springer, 34, 335–350. DOI: 10.1007/s13157-013-0501-2
12. Mondal, D., & Pal, S. (2016). Monitoring dual-season hydrological dynamics of seasonally flooded wetlands in the lower reach of Mayurakshi River, Eastern India. Geocarto International, 21(46), 1–16.
13. Lee, J., Ellis, C. D., Choi, Y. E., You, S., & Chon, J. (2015). An integrated approach to mitigation wetland site selection: A case study in Gwacheon, Korea. Sustainability, 7, 3386–3413. DOI: 10.3390/su7033386
14. Zhu, C., Luo, J., Shen, Z., & Huang, C. (2011). Wetland mapping in the Balqash Lake Basin using multi-source remote sensing data and topographic features synergic retrieval. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10, 2718–2724. DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2011.09.422
15. Shen, L., & Li, C. (2010). Water body extraction from landsat ETM + imagery using adaboost algorithm. In Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics (pp. 1–4), Beijing, China.
16. Rouse, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., & Deering, D. W. (1973). Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS (Earth resources technology satellite). In Proceedings of Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite Symposium (vol 351, pp. 309–317). Greenbelt. Canada.
17. Feyisaa, G. L., Meilbya, H., Fensholtb, R., & Proudb, S. R. (2014). Automated water extraction index: A new technique forsurface water mapping using landsat imagery. Remote Sensing Environment, 140, 25–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.029
18. McFeeters, S. K. (1996). The use of the normalized difference water index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17, 1425–1432. DOI: 10.1080/01431169608948714
19. Gao, B. C. (1996). NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Elsevier, 58, 257–266.
20. Xu, D., & Xulin, G. (2014). Compare NDVI extracted from landsat 8 imagery with that from Landsat 7 imagery. American Journal of Remote Sensing, 2(2), 10–14. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajrs.20140202.11
21. Wu, Q., & Lane, C. (2016). Wetlands delineation and quantification of wetland depressions in the Prairie Pothole region of North Dakota. Wetlands, 36(2), 215–227. DOI: 10.1007/s13157-015-0731-6
22. Serran, J. N., & Creed, I. F. (2015). New mapping techniques to estimate the preferential loss of small wetlands on prairie landscapes. Hydrology Processes, 30, 396–409. doi:10.1002/hyp.10582(wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10582
23. Tiner, W. (1993). The primary indicators method—a practical approach to wetland recognition and delineation in the United States. Wetlands, 13(1), 50–52. DOI: 10.1007/BF03160865
24. Tiner, R. W. (1990). Use a high-altitude aerial photography for inventorying forested Wetlands in the United States. Forest Ecology and Management, 3(34), 593–604. DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(90)90221-V
25. Mitra, S., Wassmann, R., & Vlek, P. L. G. (2005). An appraisal of global wetland area and its organic carbon stock. Current Science, 88(1), 25–35.
26. Dvorett, D., Davis, C., & Papes, M. (2016). Mapping and hydrologic attribution of temporary wetlands using recurrent landsat imagery. Wetlands, 36(3), 431–443. DOI: 10.1007/s13157-016-0752-9
27. Das, R. T., & Pal, S. (2016). Spatial association of wetlands over physical variants in Barind Tract of West Bengal, India. Journal of Wetlands Environmental Management, 4(2), 103–115.
28. Junk, W. J., Bayley, P. B., & Sparks, R. E. (1989). The flood-pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 106, 110–127.
29. Borro, M., Morandeira, N., Salvia, M., Minotti, P., Perna, P., & Kandus, P. (2014). Mapping shallow lakes in a large South American floodplain: A frequency approach on multitemporal landsat TM/ETM data. Journal of Hydrology, 512(1), 39–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.057
30. Kayastha, N., Thomas, V., Galbraith, J., & Banskota, A. (2012). Monitoring wetland change using inter-annual landsat time-series data. Wetlands, 32(6), 1149–1162. DOI: 10.1007/s13157-012-0345-1
31. Cuddy, J. D., & Della Valle, P. A. (1978). Measuring the instability of time series data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 40(1), 79–85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1978.mp40001006.x
32. Richter, D. B., Baumgartner, J. V., Powell, J., & Braun, D. P. (1996). A method for assessing hydrologic aiteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology, 10(4), 1163–1174. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10041163.x