Academic communities: The role of journals and open-access mega-journals in scholarly communication

Journal of Documentation

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2019, Pages 120-139

  Wakeling, Simon ^a   Spezi, Valerie ^b   Fry, Jenny ^b   Creaser, Claire ^b   Pinfield, Stephen ^a   Willett, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academic communities; Discourse communities; Open access; Open access mega journals; Qualitative methods; Scholarly communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055713814     PISSN: 00220418     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/JD-05-2018-0067     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abbott, A.D. (2001), Chaos of Disciplines, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
2. Adie, E. (2009), “Commenting on scientific articles (PLoS edition)”, Nascent, available at: http://blogs.nature.com/nascent/2009/02/commenting_on_scientific_artic.html (accessed 21 September 2017)
3. Anderson, K. (2010), “PLoS’ squandered opportunity – their problems with the path of least resistance [Web log post]”, Scholarly Kitchen Blog, available at: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/04/27/plos-squandered-opportunity-the-problem-with-pursuing-the-path-of-least-resistance/ (accessed 27 January 2016)
4. Anderson, K. (2016), “The new(ish) kids on the block – touring the megajournals [Web log post]”, The Scholarly Kitchen, available at: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2016/04/05/the-newish-kids-on-the-block-touring-the-megajournals/ (accessed 7 June 2016)
5. Becher, T. and Trowler, P. (2001), Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines, Open University Press, Buckingham
6. Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin, T.N. (1995), Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition, Culture, Power, L. Erlbaum Associates, Abingdon, available at: https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Genre_knowledge_in_disciplinary_communic.html?id=ggJtAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y (accessed 8 November 2017)
7. Björk, B.-C. (2015), “Have the ‘mega-journals’ reached the limits to growth?”, Peer J, Vol. 3, p. e981, available at: https://peerj.com/articles/981 (accessed 26 May 2017)
8. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 77-101, available at: www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa (accessed 7 November 2013)
9. Butler, D. (2013), “Investigating journals: the dark side of publishing”, Nature, Vol. 495 No. 7442, pp. 433-435, available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23538810 (accessed 4 December 2017)
10. Cohen, A.P. (1985), The Symbolic Construction of Community, Ellis Horwood and Tavistock Publications, London, available at: http://lasisummerschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Long-VErsion-of-Anthony-Cohen-PLease-only-read-selected-pages-in-Syllabus-1.pdf (accessed 26 June 2017)
11. Cope, B. and Phillips, A. (Eds) (2014), The Future of the Academic Journal, 2nd ed., Chandos Publishing, Oxford
12. Crane, D. (1972), Invisible Colleges; Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, available at: https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Invisible_Colleges_Diffusion_of_Knowledg.html?id=me9DOwAACAAJ&redir_esc=y (accessed 8 November 2017)
13. Fry, J., Probets, S., Creaser, C., Greenwood, H., Spezi, V. and White, S. (2009), “PEER behavioural research baseline: authors and users vis-à-vis journals and repositories”, available at: www.peerproject.eu/fileadmin/media/reports/Final_revision_-_behavioural_baseline_report_-_20_01_10.pdf (accessed 17 November 2017)
14. Fry, J., Oppenheim, C., Creaser, C., Johnson, W., Summers, M., White, S., Butters, G., Craven, J., Griffiths, J. and Hartley, D. (2009), “Communicating knowledge: how and why UK researchers publish and disseminate their findings”, Research Information Network (RIN), London, available at: www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/Communicating-knowledge-report.pdf (accessed 17 November 2017)
15. Garfield, E. (1979), Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities, Wiley, New York, NY
16. Harley, D., Acord, S.K., Earl-Novell, S., Lawrence, S. and King, C.J. (2010), “Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: an exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines”, Center for Studies in Higher Education, Berkeley, CA, available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/15x7385g#page-11 (accessed 12 September 2017)
17. Harrison, T. and Stephen, T.D. (1995), “The electronic journal as the heart of an online scholarly community”, Library Trends, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 592-608, available at: www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/7985/librarytrendsv43i4g_opt.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 8 November 2017)
18. Herron, T.L. and Hall, T.W. (2004), “Faculty perceptions of journals: quality and publishing feasibility”, Journal of Accounting Education, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 175-210, available at: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575104000375 (accessed 8 November 2017)
19. Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S. and Rafols, I. (2015), “Bibliometrics: the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics”, Nature, Vol. 520 No. 7548, pp. 429-431, available at: www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/520429a (accessed 11 September 2017)
20. Hjørland, B. and Albrechtsen, H. (1995), “Toward a new horizon in information science: domain-analysis”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 46 No. 6, pp. 400-425
21. Housewright, R., Schonfeld, R.C. and Wulfson, K. (2013), “UK survey of academics 2012”, available at: www.rluk.ac.uk/ (accessed 18 July 2017)
22. Kohl, D.F. and Davis, C.H. (1985), “Ratings of journals by ARL library directors and deans of library and information science schools”, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 40-47, available at: www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/40859/crl_46_01_40_opt.pdf?sequence=2 (accessed 8 November 2017)
23. McMillan, D.W. (1996), “Sense of community”, Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 315-325, available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/%28SICI%291520-6629%28199610%2924%3A4%3C315%3A%3AAID-JCOP2%3E3.0.CO%3B2-T (accessed 5 July 2017)
24. McMillan, D.W. and Chavis, D.M. (1986), “Sense of community: a definition and theory”, Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 6-23, available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/1520-6629%28198601%2914%3A1%3C6%3A%3AAID-JCOP2290140103%3E3.0.CO%3B2-I (accessed 8 November 2017)
25. Menachemi, N., Hogan, T.H. and DelliFraine, J.L. (2015), “Journal rankings by health management faculty members: are there differences by rank, leadership status, or area of expertise?”, Journal of Healthcare Management/American College of Healthcare Executives, Vol. 60 No. 1, pp. 17-28, available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26529989 (accessed 8 November 2017)
26. Müller, R. and de Rijcke, S. (2017), “Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences”, Research Evaluation, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 157-168, available at: https://academic.oup.com/rev/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/reseval/rvx023 (accessed 8 September 2017)
27. Neylon, C. and Wu, S. (2009), “Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact”, PLoS Biology, Vol. 7 No. 11, p. e1000242, available at: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000242 (accessed 25 May 2017)
28. Nicholas, D., Williams, P., Rowlands, I. and Jamali, H.R. (2010), “Researchers’ e-journal use and information seeking behaviour”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 494-516, available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0165551510371883 (accessed 11 September 2017)
29. Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Volentine, R., Allard, S., Levine, K., Tenopir, C. and Herman, E. (2014), “Trust and authority in scholarly communications in the light of the digital transition: setting the scene for a major study”, Learned Publishing, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 121-134, available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1087/20140206 (accessed 8 September 2017)
30. Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Rodrí-guez-Bravo, B., Xu, J., Abrizah, A., Świgoń, M. and Herman, E. (2017), “Early career researchers: scholarly behaviour and the prospect of change”, Learned Publishing, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 157-166, available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/leap.1098 (accessed 8 September 2017)
31. Patterson, M. (2009), “PLoS journals – measuring impact where it matters”, The Official PLOS Blog, available at: http://blogs.plos.org/plos/2009/07/plos-journals-measuring-impact-where-it-matters/ (accessed 20 April 2017)
32. Research Information Network (RIN) (2007), “Researchers’ use of academic libraries and their services”, Research Information Network (RIN), London
33. Rijcke, S.D., Wouters, P.F., Rushforth, A.D., Franssen, T.P. and Hammarfelt, B. (2016), “Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use–a literature review”, Research Evaluation, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 161-169, available at: https://academic.oup.com/rev/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/reseval/rvv038 (accessed 8 September 2017)
34. Saldaña, J. (2013), The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, SAGE Publications, London
35. Sands, R. (2014), “Comparing the results from two surveys of BMJ Open authors [Web log post]”, BMJ Blogs, available at: http://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2014/05/09/comparing-the-results-from-two-surveys-of-bmj-open-authors/ (accessed 12 December 2015)
36. Sivertsen, G. (2017), “Unique, but still best practice? The Research Excellence Framework (REF) from an international perspective”, Palgrave Communications, Vol. 3, p. e17078, available at: www.nature.com/articles/palcomms201778.pdf (accessed 12 January 2018)
37. Solomon, D.J. (2014), “A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals”, Peer J, Vol. 2, p. e365, available at: https://peerj.com/articles/365 (accessed 3 December 2015)
38. Spezi, V., Wakeling, S., Pinfield, S., Creaser, C., Fry, J. and Willett, P. (2017), “Open-access mega-journals: the future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 73 No. 2, pp. 263-283, available at: www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0082 (accessed 24 March 2017)
39. Swales, J.M. (1990), Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, available at: https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Genre_Analysis.html?id=shX_EV1r3-0C (accessed 8 November 2017)
40. Swales, J.M. (1998), Other Foors, Other Voices: A Textography of a Small University Building, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
41. Taylor, L. and Willett, P. (2017), “Comparison of US and UK rankings of LIS journals”, Aslib Journal of Information Management, Vol. 69 No. 3, pp. 354-367, available at: www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/AJIM-08-2016-0136 (accessed 8 November 2017)
42. Tenopir, C. (2016), “What motivates authors of scholarly articles? The importance of journal attributes and potential audience on publication choice”, Publications, Vol. 4 No. 3, p. 22, available at: www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/4/3/22/htm (accessed 22 August 2016)
43. Tönnies, F. (1957), Community and Society (Translated by C.P. Loomis), Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, available at: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=sKcITieRERYC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed 8 November 2017)
44. Trowler, P. (2014), “Academic tribes and territories: the theoretical trajectory”, Österreichische Zeitschrift Für Geschichtswissenschaften, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 17-26
45. Tucker, B.P. and Lowe, A.D. (2014), “Practitioners are from mars: academics are from Venus?”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 394-425, available at: www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2012-00932 (accessed 17 November 2017)
46. Wakeling, S. (2016), “Open-access mega-journals: a bibliometric profile”, PLOS ONE, Vol. 11 No. 11, p. e0165359, available at: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165359 (accessed 26 May 2017)
47. Wakeling, S., Spezi, V., Creaser, C., Fry, J., Pinfield, S. and Willett, P. (2017), Open access megajournals: the publisher perspective (part 2: operational realities), Learned Publishing, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 313-322
48. Wakeling, S., Spezi, V., Fry, J., Creaser, C., Pinfield, S. and Willett, P. (2017), “Open Access megajournals: the publisher perspective (Part 1: Motivations)”, Learned Publishing, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 301-311, available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/leap.1117 (accessed 18 October 2017)
49. Ware, M. and Mabe, M. (2015), The STM Report, International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, The Hague, available at: www.markwareconsulting.com/the-stm-report/ (accessed 12 June 2017)
50. Whitley, R. (2000), The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Oxford University Press, Oxford
51. Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Curry, S., Hill, S. and Johnson, B. (2015), Metric Tide – Higher Education Funding Council for England, Higher Education Funding Council for England, Bristol, available at: www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rereports/year/2015/metrictide/ (accessed 8 November 2017)