Impacts of institutional rules and spatial context on public management

International Journal of Public Administration

Volumn 26, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1377-1400

  Kirlin, John J ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collective actions; Governance capacity; Institutional; Spatial

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055301248     PISSN: 01900692     EISSN: 15324265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/PAD-120024402     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. North, D., 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Spruyt, H., 1994. Institutional selection in international relations: state anarchy as order. Int. Organ., 48 (4): 527–557.
3. 1997. World Development Report 1997 Washington, DC: World Bank. World Bank
4. Hall, R. E., and Jones, C. I., 1999. Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?. Q. J. Econ., 114 (1): 83–116. the page citations here are to the paper as included in Stanford University, Department of Economics, Working Papers, http://www.econ.stanford.edu/workp/index.html. 8.28.98
5. Moore, M. H., 1995. Creating Public Value: Strategies for Management in Government Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6. Barzelay, M., 1998. International Public Management Network Conference. June301998, Salem, OR. Dialoguing About Performance Management and NPM, http://www.willamette.org/ipmn/research/papers/salem/barzelay.doc 8.12.01
7. Kirlin, J. J., 1996. The big questions of public administration in a democracy. Public Admin. Rev., 56 (5): 416–423.
8. Kirlin, J. J., 2001a. Big questions of public administration. Public Admin. Rev., 61 (2): 140–143.
9. Radin, B. A., 2000. Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
10. Stone, C., Henig, J., and Jones, B., 2001. The Quest for Civic Capacity: The Politics of Urban School Reform Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
11. Putnam, R. D., 1993. Making Democracy Work Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. Putnam, R. D., 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community New York: Simon and Schuster.
13. Luke, J. S., 1998. Catalytic Leadership: Strategies for an Interconnected World San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. 2000. Environment.gov: Transforming Environmental Protection for the 21st Century Washington, DC: NAPA. National Academy of Public Administration
15. Clingermayer, J. E., and Feiock, R. C., 2001. Institutional Constraints and Policy Choice: An Exploration of Local Governance Albany, NY: The State University of New York Press.
16. Lowery, D., 2000. A transaction cost model of metropolitan government: allocation versus redistribution in urban America. J. Publ. Admin. Res. and Theor., 10 (1): 49–78.
17. Erie, S., Kirlin, J., and Rabinovitz, F., 1972. “ Can something be done? Propositions on the performance of metropolitan institutions ”. In Reform of Metropolitan Governments, Lowdon Wingo, Series Ed. 7–42. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future.
18. Scott, A. J., 2000. The Cultural Economy of Cities: Essays on the Geography of Issue Producing Industries London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
19. Rosenbloom, D. H., 2001. History lessons for reinventors. Public Admin. Rev., 61 (2): 161–165.
20. 1966. Modernizing Local Government New York: CED. Committee for Economic Development
21. 1979. Reshaping Government in Metropolitan Areas New York: CED. Committee for Economic Development
22. Savas, E. S., 1982. How to Shrink Government: Privatizing the Public Sector Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
23. Sonenblum, S., Kirlin, J. J., and Ries, J. C., 1977. How Cities Provide Services: The Effects of Alternative Structures Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Press.
24. Stone, C. N., 1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
25. Nivola, P., 2001. Tense Commandments: Federal Prescriptions and City Problems. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. August 29–September 32001, San Francisco.
26. Stansel, D., 1994. Policy Analysis. Taming Leviathan. Are Tax and Spending Limits the Answer? Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
27. Kirlin, J. J., 1982. The Political Economy of Fiscal Limits Lexington, MA: Lexington Books/D.C. Health and Company.
28. Kirlin, J. J., 1998. The impact of fiscal limits on governance. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 25: 195 ff
29. Kirlin, J. J., 2001b. Lessons from Adaptive, Entrepreneurial Cities. Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. 2001b, San Francisco. San Francisco
30. Chapman, J. I., 1998. Proposition 13: Some Unintended Consequences San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California. Occasional Papers
31. Sokolow, A. D., 1998. The changing property tax and state-local relations. Publius J Federalism, 28 (1): 165–187.
32. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 2000 United States Census Bureau
33. Burt, R. S., 1992. Structured Holes: The Social Structure of Competition Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
34. Provan, K. J., and Milward, H. B., 1995. A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: a comparison of four community mental health systems. Admin. Sci. Quart., 42 (March): 1–33.
35. Provan, K. J., and Milward, H. B., 2001. Do public sector networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Admin. Rev., 61 (4): 414–423.
36. Silvern, P., 2000. “ Limits to environmental protection innovation: can EPA accommodate California and other leading-edge states? In National Academy of Public Administration ”. In Environment.gov: Transforming Environmental Protection for the 21st Century Vol. III, 11–17. Washington, DC: NAPA. Research Papers
37. Tayler, J., 2001. Russia is finished: the unstoppable descent of a once great power into social catastrophe and strategic irrelevance. The Atlantic Monthly, 287 (5): 35–52.
38. Uzzi, B., 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci Quart., 42 (March): 35–67.
39. Evans, P., 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40. Haverman, H. A., 1992. Between a rock and a hard place: organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation. Admin. Sci. Quart., 37 (March): 48–75.
41. Pfeffer, J., and Salanick, G. R., 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependency Perspective New York: Harper and Row.
42. Sastry, M. A., 2001. Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart., 42 (June): 237–275.