Big questions for a significant public administration

Public Administration Review

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 140-143

  Kirlin, John J ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039886753     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0033-3352.00015     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Behn, Robert. 1995. The Big Questions of Public Management. Public Administration Review 55(4): 313-24.
2. Berry, Jeffrey M., Kent E. Portney, and Ken Thompson. 1993. The Rebirth of Urban Democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
3. David, Paul A. 2000. Path Dependence, Its Critics and the Quest for "Historical Economics." In Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas: Past and Present, edited by P. Garrouste and S. Ioannides. Cheltenham, UK: Edward, Elgar Publishing.
4. Frederickson, H. George. 1999. The Repositioning of American Public Administration - The John Gaus Lecture. PS: Political Science and Politics 32(4): 701-11.
5. Hall, Robert E., and Charles I. Jones. 1999. Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others? Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(1): 83-116.
6. Kettl, Donald F. 2000. Public Administration at the Millennium: The State of the Field. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(1): 7-34.
7. Kirlin, John J. 1996. The Big Questions of Public Administration in a Democracy. Public Administration Review 56(5): 416-23.
8. Light, Paul C. 2000. The True Size of Government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
9. Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs. 2000. The Government Performance Project. Available at http:// www.maxwell.syr.edu/gpp/project_header.htm. Accessed July 23, 2000.
10. McPherson, James M. 2000. For a Vast Future Also: Lincoln and the Millennium. Jefferson Lecture, National Endowment for the Humanities. Available at http://206.161.132.1/news/ mcpherson/speech.html/. Accessed March 28, 2000.
11. National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA). 2000. Report of the Priority Issues Task Force. Washington, DC: NAPA, January 10.
12. North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Ostrom, Elinor. 1998. A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action. American Political Science Review 92(1): 1-22.
14. Ottensmann, John R. 2000. The Economic Value of Selected Activities of the Catholic Diocese of Cleveland-Draft. Indianapolis: Center for Urban Policy and the Environment, School of Public and Environmental Affairs.
15. Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Stivers, Camilla. 2000. Special Report: "An Impossible Job": Report on the Building Bridges Tour. Public Administration Review 60(3): 194-9.
17. Tarrow, Sidney G. 1996. Making Social Science Work across Space and Time: A Critical Reflection on Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work. American Political Science Review 90(2): 389-98.
18. Weeks, Edward C. 2000. The Practice of Deliberative Democracy: Results from Four Large-Scale Trials. Public Administration Review 60(4): 360-72.
19. World Bank. World Development Report, 1997. Washington, DC: World Bank.