Implications of the propensity score matching paradox in pharmacoepidemiology

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 187, Issue 9, 2018, Pages 1951-1961

  Ripollone, John E ^a,b   Huybrechts, Krista F ^a,b   Rothman, Kenneth J ^a,c   Ferguson, Ryan E ^a,d   Franklin, Jessica M ^b  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^d VA BOSTON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Covariate balance; Mahalanobis distance matching; Propensity score; Propensity score matching

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; DATA SET; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PRUNING;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; DATA PROCESSING; ELDERLY CARE; INSURANCE; MEDICAID; PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY; PREVALENCE; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING PARADOX; UNITED STATES; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; PROCEDURES;

UNITED STATES;

ALGORITHMS; HUMANS; PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY; PROPENSITY SCORE;

EID: 85054988822     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwy078     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Hade EM, Lu B. Bias associated with using the estimated propensity score as a regression covariate. Stat Med. 2014; 33(1):74-87
2. Pearl J. The foundations of causal inference. Sociol Methodol. 2010;40(1):75-149
3. Wu S, Ding Y, Wu F, et al. Application of propensity-score matching in four leading medical journals. Epidemiology. 2015;26(2):e19-e20
4. D'Agostino RB Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17(19):2265-2281
5. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70(1):41-55
6. Desai RJ, Rothman KJ, Bateman BT, et al. A propensity-scorebased fine stratification approach for confounding adjustment when exposure is infrequent. Epidemiology. 2017;28(2): 249-257
7. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399-424
8. Rassen JA, Shelat AA, Myers J, et al. One-to-many propensity score matching in cohort studies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(suppl 2):69-80
9. King G, Nielsen R. Why propensity scores should not be used for matching. 2016. https://gking.harvard.edu/files/gking/files/ psnot.pdf?m=1481894836. Accessed November 27, 2017
10. Pan W, Bai H, eds. Propensity Score Analysis: Fundamentals and Developments. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2015
11. Iacus SM, King G, Porro G. Causal inference without balance checking: coarsened exactmatching. Polit Anal. 2012;20(1):1-24
12. Mielke PW Jr, Berry KJ. Permutation Methods: A Distance Function Approach. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2007
13. Greevy R, Lu B, Silber JH, et al. Optimal multivariate matching before randomization. Biostatistics. 2004;5(2): 263-275
14. Hill J. Discussion of research using propensity-score matching: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine. Stat Med. 2008;27(12): 2055-2061
15. Imai K, King G, Stuart EA. Misunderstandings between experimentalists and observationalists about causal inference. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2008;171(2):481-502
16. King G, Zeng L. When can history be our guide? The pitfalls of counterfactual inference. Int Stud Q. 2007;51(1):183-210
17. Imai K, King G, Nall C. The essential role of pair matching in cluster-randomized experiments, with application to the Mexican Universal Health Insurance evaluation. Stat Sci. 2009;24(1):29-53
18. Petri H, Urquhart J. Channeling bias in the interpretation of drug effects. Stat Med. 1991;10(4):577-581
19. Patorno E, Grotta A, Bellocco R, et al. Propensity sore methodology for confounding control in health care utilization databases. Epidemiol Biostat Public Health. 2013;10(3): e8940-1-e8940-16
20. Patorno E, Glynn RJ, Hernandez-Diaz S, et al. Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments. Epidemiology. 2014;25(2): 268-278
21. Brookhart MA, Wang PS, Solomon DH, et al. Evaluating short-term drug effects using a physician-specific prescribing preference as an instrumental variable. Epidemiology. 2006; 17(3):268-275
22. Schneeweiss S, Solomon DH, Wang PS, et al. Simultaneous assessment of short-term gastrointestinal benefits and cardiovascular risks of selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors and nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: an instrumental variable analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(11): 3390-3398
23. Bateman BT, Hernandez-Diaz S, Fischer MA, et al. Statins and congenital malformations: cohort study. BMJ. 2015;350
24. Huybrechts KF, Palmsten K, Avorn J, et al. Antidepressant use in pregnancy and the risk of cardiac defects. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(25):2397-2407
25. Schneeweiss S, Rassen JA, Glynn RJ, et al. High-dimensional propensity score adjustment in studies of treatment effects using health care claims data. Epidemiology. 2009;20(4): 512-522
26. King G, Nielsen R, Coberley C, et al. Comparative effectiveness of matching methods for causal inference. 2011. https://gking.harvard.edu/files/gking/files/psparadox.pdf?m= 1360040664. Accessed November 27, 2017
27. Ho DE, Imai K, King G, et al. Matchit: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw. 2011;42(8):1-28
28. Ho DE, Imai K, King G, et al. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parameteric causal inference. Polit Anal. 2007;15(3):199-236
29. Franklin JM, Rassen JA, Ackermann D, et al. Metrics for covariate balance in cohort studies of causal effects. Stat Med. 2014;33(10):1685-1699
30. Gu XS, Rosenbaum PR. Comparison of multivariate matching methods: structures, distances, and algorithms. J Comput Graph Stat. 1993;2(4):405-420
31. Harrell FE Jr, Califf RM, Pryor DB, et al. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA. 1982;247(18):2543-2546
32. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Califf RM, et al. Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction. Stat Med. 1984; 3(2):143-152
33. Oakes JM, Kaufman JS, eds. Methods in Social Epidemiology. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2017
34. Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensityscore matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28(25):3083-3107
35. Rubin DB. Using multivariate matched sampling and regression adjustment to control bias in observational studies. J Am Stat Assoc. 1979;74(366):318-328
36. Stuart EA. Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Stat Sci. 2010;25(1):1-21
37. Zhao Z. Using matching to estimate treatment effects: data requirements, matching metrics, and Monte Carlo evidence. Rev Econ Stat. 2004;86(1):91-107
38. King G, Lucas C, Nielsen RA. The balance-sample size frontier in matching methods for causal inference. Am J Polit Sci. 2017;61(2):473-489