An analysis of retractions of dental publications

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 79, Issue , 2018, Pages 19-23

  Faggion, Clovis Mariano ^a   Ware, Robert S ^b   Bakas, Nikolaos ^c   Wasiak, Jason ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c NEAPOLIS UNIVERSITY PAFOS   (Cyprus)

^d OLIVIA NEWTON JOHN CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Conflict of interest; Ethics; Retracted publication; Retraction of publication

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DENTAL RESEARCH; DENTISTRY; EDITOR; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; MEDLINE; NARRATIVE; PUBLISHING; RETRACTION NOTICE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SCIENTIST; SEARCH ENGINE; TRUST; WEB OF SCIENCE; WRITING; METHODOLOGY;

JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; PLAGIARISM; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH DESIGN; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 85054589396     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). 2009 [Accessed 14 May 2018] https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines.
2. Pupovac, V., Fanelli, D., Scientists admitting to plagiarism: a meta-analysis of surveys. Sci. Eng. Ethics 21 (2015), 1331–1352.
3. Miller, D.R., Publication fraud: implications to the individual and to the specialty. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 24 (2011), 154–159.
4. Fanelli, D., How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS. One, 4, 2009, e5738.
5. George, S.L., Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 21 (2016), 15–21.
6. Hosseini, M., Hilhorst, M., de Beaufort, I., Fanelli, D., Doing the right thing: a qualitative investigation of retractions due to unintentional error. Sci. Eng. Ethics 24 (2018), 189–206.
7. Nogueira, T.E., Gonçalves, A.S., Leles, C.R., Batista, A.C., Costa, L.R., A survey of retracted articles in dentistry. BMC Res. Notes, 10, 2017, 253.
8. Shamim, T., Data regarding articles retracted from PubMed indexed dental journals from India. Data Brief 18 (2018), 1069–1072.
9. Bozzo, A., Bali, K., Evaniew, N., Ghert, M., Retractions in cancer research: a systematic Survey. Res. Integr. Peer Rev., 2, 2017, 5.
10. Fang, F.C., Steen, R.G., Casadevall, A., Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 (2012), 17028–17033.
11. Wager, E., Williams, P., Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008. J. Med. Ethics 37 (2011), 567–570.
12. Yan, J., MacDonald, A., Baisi, L.P., Evaniew, N., Bhandari, M., Ghert, M., Retractions in orthopaedic research: a systematic review. Bone Joint Res. 5 (2016), 263–268.
13. Wang, J., Ku, J.C., Alotaibi, N.M., Rutka, J.T., Retraction of neurosurgical publications: a systematic review. World Neurosurg. 103 (2017), 809–814.
14. Wasiak, J., Hamilton, D., Farshad, F., Faggion, C.M. Jr., Surveying retracted studies and notices within the field of radiation oncology. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2018, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.028.
15. Higgins, J.P.T., Green, S., (eds.) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [Updated March 2011], 2011, The Cochrane Collaboration Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org.
16. Samp, J.C., Schumock, G.T., Pickard, A.S., Retracted publications in the drug literature. Pharmacotherapy 32 (2012), 586–595.
17. World Bank Country Classification. 2017 [Accessed 14 May 2018] https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519.
18. Saha, S., Saint, S., Christakis, D.A., Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 91 (2003), 42–46.
19. Rai, R., Sabharwal, S., Retracted publications in orthopaedics: prevalence, characteristics, and trends. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 99, 2017, e44.
20. Amos, K.A., The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 102 (2014), 87–91.
21. Bilbrey, E., O'Dell, N., Creamer, J., A novel rubric for rating the quality of retraction notices. Publications 2 (2014), 14–26.
22. Hesselmann, F., Graf, V., Schmidt, M., Reinhart, M., The visibility of scientific misconduct: a review of the literature on retracted journal articles. Curr. Sociol. 65 (2017), 814–845.
23. Moylan, E.C., Kowalczuk, M.K., Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central. BMJ Open, 6, 2016, e012047.
24. Irwin, A.N., Rackham, D., Comparison of the time-to-indexing in PubMed between biomedical journals according to impact factor, discipline, and focus. Res. Social Adm. Pharm. 13 (2017), 389–393.
25. Almeida, R.M., de Albuquerque Rocha, K., Catelani, F., Fontes-Pereira, A.J., Vasconcelos, S.M., Plagiarism allegations account for most retractions in major latin American/Caribbean databases. Sci. Eng. Ethics 22 (2016), 1447–1456.
26. Stretton, S., Bramich, N.J., Keys, J.R., Monk, J.A., Ely, J.A., Haley, C., Woolley, M.J., Woolley, K.L., Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 28 (2012), 1575–1583.
27. Budd, J.M., Sievert, M., Schultz, T.R., Scoville, C., Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc. 87 (1999), 437–443.
28. Neale, A.V., Dailey, R.K., Abrams, J., Analysis of citations to biomedical articles affected by scientific misconduct. Sci. Eng. Ethics 16 (2010), 251–261.
29. Long, T.C., Errami, M., George, A.C., Sun, Z., Garner, H.R., Scientific integrity. Responding to possible plagiarism. Science 323 (2009), 1293–1294.
30. Vickers, A.J., Sharing raw data from clinical trials: what progress since we first asked, Whose data set is it anyway?. Trials, 17, 2016, 227.